A lender may levy disclosed penal charges for material non-compliance, but the charge should not become a hidden interest-rate enhancer.
The right question is not merely “was I late?” but “which contractual breach, amount base and disclosed charge produced this figure?”
RBI’s fair-lending framework requires penalties for non-compliance with material loan terms to be treated as penal charges rather than penal interest added to the interest rate. The quantum and reason must be disclosed transparently in the loan agreement, Key Fact Statement where applicable, and the lender’s policy.
Penal charges must not be capitalised, meaning the lender should not calculate further interest on those charges. Normal interest can continue on the outstanding principal under the loan contract. For repayment default, RBI’s FAQ clarifies that the penal charge should be based on the amount under default rather than automatically on the entire outstanding balance.
Not every amount labelled as a “charge” is the same. Cheque-bounce fees, mandate-failure fees, legal expenses, overdue interest and penal charges can have different bases. Ask for a line-by-line ledger instead of arguing from the total figure.
| Ledger item | What to check | Borrower question |
|---|---|---|
| Contractual interest | Rate and principal base | Does it match the sanction and reset communication? |
| Penal charge | Material breach and amount base | Which clause and default amount were used? |
| Bounce or mandate fee | Per-instance disclosure | How many failed presentations occurred? |
| Legal or recovery expense | Actual basis and contract | Is supporting documentation available? |
| Tax | Applicable tax treatment | Was tax applied only where legally due? |
A borrower misses one EMI of ₹25,000 on a much larger outstanding loan. The lender should be able to explain the penal-charge policy and the default amount used. The borrower should not assume the charge must be zero, but can challenge an unexplained calculation on the entire loan balance.
Ask the lender’s grievance officer for the contractual provision, policy and calculation. If an RBI-regulated entity does not resolve an eligible complaint through its internal process, consider RBI CMS. Court or arbitration advice may be required for contractual disputes outside the Ombudsman’s scope.
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.