Skip to content
LabourOSHWC CodeCentral Rules › Rule 78
OSHWC Central Rules · Chapter IX

Rule 78 — Powers and duties of Inspector-cum-Facilitator

Rule-by-rule operational analysis with Code, Form, evidence, authority and State-jurisdiction controls.

Rule status: Final Central Rule notified by G.S.R. 345(E), 8 May 2026; Gazette ID CG-DL-E-09052026-272379 and effective on publication. Apply only within the Central Government’s jurisdiction and subject to later orders.

Rule identity

Chapter

IX — Inspector-cum-Facilitator and other authority

Part/sector

General

Control family

Regulatory authority and inspection control

Linked Code sections

Section 34, Section 35, Section 36, Section 37, Section 38, Section 39, Section 40, Section 41, Section 42

Forms

No direct Annexure VII form identified

Source review

2026-07-17

Rule-level operational analysis

The exact Gazette wording controls. The following map converts Rule 78 into an implementation sequence and highlights the records needed to demonstrate compliance.

  1. Requirement 1. Verify the officer’s jurisdiction, appointment and the statutory purpose of the visit, sample, survey or inquiry.
  2. Requirement 2. Nominate an authorised site contact while preserving worker access and non-retaliation rights.
  3. Requirement 3. Provide accurate documents and facilities; record items taken, samples sealed and statements made.
  4. Requirement 4. Assess improvement, prohibition or inquiry directions immediately and diarise appeal or compliance periods.
  5. Requirement 5. Close findings with evidence and preserve legal privilege over separate advice where appropriate.

Sub-rule review protocol

Who acts

Identify the employer, occupier, manager, contractor, worker, medical officer, Inspector-cum-Facilitator or other authority named in each sub-rule.

When

Record the triggering event and calculate every hour/day/month period from documentary evidence.

How

Use the portal, prescribed Form, written notice, examination, committee or technical control stated in the Rule.

Exception/proviso

Do not generalise an exception. Record why its facts and jurisdiction are satisfied.

Decision evidence

Keep the maker, reviewer, competent authority, date, acknowledgement and corrected version.

Later instrument

Check general/special orders, authority notifications, standards and State rules before reliance.

Code and Form concordance

Evidence and audit file

Failure consequence and cure

Obstruction, concealment or non-compliance with a lawful direction can create separate penal exposure.

Where the Rule uses a portal, form or notified authority, a locally created substitute is not automatically equivalent. Cure should preserve the original due date and explain any late correction.

Worked implementation scenario

A covered establishment converts “Powers and duties of Inspector-cum-Facilitator” into a control with a named owner, trigger, deadline, prescribed evidence, reviewer and escalation path. A sample transaction is tested before the policy is treated as operational.

Rule-specific QA questions

Has the exact Gazette text been checked?

Yes for source structure and title; users must still read the complete Rule and sub-rules before applying it to facts.

Is this a State-rule page?

No. It covers the 2026 Central Rules. State-specific implementation belongs in a separately sourced State overlay.

Can another existing Finin2min article own this rule?

No. This URL is the canonical legal repository for Rule 78. Articles and hubs should link here without reproducing the full rule analysis.

Official source