Employer correction
Correct master data, contribution/return or evidence through the authorised route while retaining the original record and reason.
Regulation 94: Authority which may issue certificate
Regulation-wise current-law crosswalk, implementation controls, evidence, remedies and transition treatment.
Current legal status and scope
Regulation 94 addresses ESIC governance or delegated decision-making: Authority which may issue certificate.
Transition control: The ESI Act, 1948 has been repealed. Code section 164(2)(b) keeps ESI rules, regulations and schemes in force for one year from commencement, only to the extent not inconsistent with the Code; section 164(2)(a) separately preserves prior actions subject to its conditions. The Corporation approved framing of 2026 General Regulations on 30 June 2026; this page does not treat that approval as a final Gazette replacement. Consolidated regulation text.
Regulation-specific legal and control map
Control 1: Confirm the competent body/officer and valid delegation before relying on a decision.
Confirm the competent body/officer and valid delegation before relying on a decision.
Implementation test: fix the event date, responsible person, evidence source, current Code/Rule owner and any later ESIC instruction before concluding compliance.
Control 2: Check quorum, voting, agenda, minutes and conflict disclosures where the provision concerns meetings.
Check quorum, voting, agenda, minutes and conflict disclosures where the provision concerns meetings.
Implementation test: fix the event date, responsible person, evidence source, current Code/Rule owner and any later ESIC instruction before concluding compliance.
Control 3: Preserve the resolution/order and the statutory source of authority.
Preserve the resolution/order and the statutory source of authority.
Implementation test: fix the event date, responsible person, evidence source, current Code/Rule owner and any later ESIC instruction before concluding compliance.
Control 4: A relaxation or delegated decision must remain within the enabling Code and cannot override a mandatory provision.
A relaxation or delegated decision must remain within the enabling Code and cannot override a mandatory provision.
Implementation test: fix the event date, responsible person, evidence source, current Code/Rule owner and any later ESIC instruction before concluding compliance.
Responsible parties
Corporation, Standing Committee, Medical Benefit Council, Regional Board/local committee or authorised officer
Trigger
A governance decision, delegation, meeting, relaxation or benefit determination is required.
Current-law crosswalk
Primary Code sections: 32, 39, 41. Central Rules: 22, 25.
Do not duplicate: the full Code and Central Rule analysis remains under the L3 Social Security corpus. This page owns only the saved regulation and its operational transition.
Evidence and audit trail
- agenda and notice
- attendance/quorum
- resolution/minutes
- delegation order
- reasoned decision
Quality controls
- Event date and legal-version lock.
- Employee/insured-person identifier reconciliation.
- Maker-checker review and exception log.
- Current portal acknowledgement or reasoned authority decision.
- Privacy-controlled retention of medical and dependant records.
Non-compliance, remedy and escalation
A decision by the wrong authority or without required procedure is vulnerable to challenge.
Insured person or claimant
Use the appropriate claim, grievance, Medical Board, review, ESI Court or High Court route according to the disputed issue.
Authority control
Keep assessment, benefit, interest, damages, recovery and penalty decisions separately reasoned and quantified.
Worked implementation scenario
A transaction arises under Regulation 94 — Authority which may issue certificate. The compliance owner records the event date and identifies whether the issue concerns coverage, contribution, medical evidence or benefit. The current Code section and 2026 Central Rule are checked first; the saved regulation is then used only for the surviving operational detail. The maker prepares the portal filing, claim or decision pack, while a reviewer verifies identity, wage/contribution or medical evidence, limitation and later ESIC directions. The acknowledgement, calculation and correspondence are preserved together.
Failure pattern: copying the paper-era process without checking whether the Code, final Central Rules or ESIC digital workflow has displaced it.
Practical Q&A
Is Regulation 94 automatically current because it appears in a consolidated text?
No. It survives only through the Code’s savings framework and only to the extent it is not inconsistent with the Code, final Central Rules or a later valid replacement.
Can portal acceptance cure an incorrect legal classification?
No. Portal processing does not conclusively determine coverage, contribution wage, medical entitlement, dependant status or limitation.
Should the proposed 2026 General Regulations be used now?
Not as final law unless and until a valid Gazette notification brings the replacement instrument into force. Track the official status page.
Related provisions and tools
Code section 32Current Code provisionCode section 39Current Code provisionCode section 41Current Code provisionCentral Rule 22Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026Central Rule 25Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026ESI concordanceCode–Rule–Regulation map2026 Regulations statusDraft/replacement watch