Central authority register · source checked 20 August 2026

OSHWC Central notifications and authority appointments

Reviewed by Finin2min Editorial Desk · Last reviewed 20 August 2026

Direct Gazette links for key current authority appointments, plus the Ministry register for the wider Central-sphere notification set.

Direct-source rule

Where Finin2min states the name/jurisdiction of an appointed authority below, the entry links to the official instrument rather than only to a generic Ministry gateway.

Scope

State appointments and State-rule jurisdictions remain separate. Always confirm the appropriate Government and later superseding notifications.

Verified authority notifications

S.O. 2484(E) — Chief Inspector-cum-Facilitator of Mines ↗13 May 2026 · Section 34(5) · Director General of Mines Safety, DGMS, Dhanbad; all territories to which the Code extends.S.O. 2515(E) — Inspectors-cum-Facilitators of Mines ↗13 May 2026 · Section 34(1) · DGMS officers with detailed national/zonal/regional jurisdictions.S.O. 2491(E) — dock-work appellate authority ↗13 May 2026 · Section 111(3) · Director (Safety), Dock Safety Division, DGFASLI, Mumbai; all major ports.

Linked Code provisions

Section 34 — Inspector-cum-Facilitators Section 111 — offences / appellate appointment context Central Rules 2026 State overlays

Wider current notification register

Additional Central appointments include registration and Central Labour Commissioner sphere authorities. Use the Ministry Labour Codes library ↗ to retrieve the current official file before relying on the exact officer, territorial limit or class of establishment.

Evidence and verification checklist

Confirm the current, in-force text governing OSHWC Central notifications and authority appointments on the official source linked above - the summary on this page is an implementation aid, not a substitute for it.
Record the exact event/transaction date, since the applicable version of the law, form or threshold can change between the date of the underlying event and today.
Preserve the primary documents (notices, applications, orders, acknowledgements) that would let a reviewer reconstruct how the facts were classified and what was actually done.
Check for a State-specific rule, later amendment or binding judicial decision that may modify how this applies on your facts.

Before relying on this page

This page is a structured implementation summary, not the operative legal text. Portal or process acceptance of a filing does not by itself establish legal compliance - the underlying classification, authority, evidence and timeline still have to be independently correct. Where the facts are contested, high-value, or time-barred if delayed, verify the current position with the official source and, where appropriate, a qualified professional before acting.