Skip to main contentSkip to content
Labour HubIndustrial Relations CodeSections › Section 75
Industrial Relations Code, 2020 · CHAPTER IX — LAY-OFF, RETRENCHMENT AND CLOSURE

Section 75: Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings

Reviewed by Finin2min Editorial Desk · Last reviewed 30 August 2026

Section 75 — Governs compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings and the rights, duties, powers or procedure expressly stated in this section. Key operative text: (1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the…

Full official textSource checked: 20 August 20260 direct Central Rule link(s)
Current-law status

All provisions were brought into force from 21 November 2025 under S.O. 5320(E); use the current India Code consolidation because the Code also reflects the 2026 amendment/transition framework.

Primary sources

Provision / India Code ↗ · Official Act PDF ↗ · 2026 Central Rules ↗

Finin2min analysis — what the section actually does

Operative clauses

  • (1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70, as if the worker had been retrenched:
  • Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
  • Explanation.—An industrial establishment which is closed down by reason merely of— (i) financial difficulties (including financial losses); or (ii) accumulation of un-disposed stocks; or (iii) the expiry of the period of the lease or license granted to it; or (iv) in case where the undertaking is engaged in mining operations, exhaustion of the minerals in the area in which operations are carried on, shall not be…
  • (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an undertaking engaged in mining operations is closed down by reason merely of exhaustion of the minerals in the area in which such operations are carried on, no worker referred to in that sub-section shall be entitled to any notice or compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70, if— (a) the employer provides the worker, at the…
  • (b) the service of the worker has not been interrupted by such alternative employment; and (c) the employer is, under the terms of such alternative employment or otherwise, legally liable to pay to the worker, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by such alternative employment.

Provisos, explanations & qualifications

  • Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
  • Explanation.—An industrial establishment which is closed down by reason merely of— (i) financial difficulties (including financial losses); or (ii) accumulation of un-disposed stocks; or (iii) the expiry of the period of the lease or license granted to it; or (iv) in case where the undertaking is engaged in mining operations, exhaustion of the minerals…

Thresholds and timelines in the text

  • Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings.—(1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in…
  • Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
  • (4) Where any undertaking set up for the construction of buildings, bridges, roads, canals, dams or other construction work is closed down on account of the completion of the work within two years from the date on which the undertaking had been set up, no worker employed therein shall be entitled to any compensation under clause (b) of section 70, but if…

Actors expressly appearing in the text

Employer, Worker

Full statutory text — Section 75

Official English text transcribed from the current India Code consolidation; page headers/line breaks are normalised for web reading. The Gazette/India Code PDF remains authoritative for typography, amendment footnotes and schedules.
75. Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings.—(1) Where an
establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous
service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to
the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the
provisions of section 70, as if the worker had been retrenched:
   Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances
beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of
section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
   Explanation.—An industrial establishment which is closed down by reason merely of—
      (i) financial difficulties (including financial losses); or
      (ii) accumulation of un-disposed stocks; or
      (iii) the expiry of the period of the lease or license granted to it; or
      (iv) in case where the undertaking is engaged in mining operations, exhaustion of the minerals in
   the area in which operations are carried on,
shall not be deemed to be closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of
the employer within the meaning of the proviso to this sub-section.
   (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an undertaking engaged in mining
operations is closed down by reason merely of exhaustion of the minerals in the area in which such
operations are carried on, no worker referred to in that sub-section shall be entitled to any notice or
compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70, if—
       (a) the employer provides the worker, at the place located within a radius of twenty kilometres
   from such undertaking engaged in mining operation is closed down, with alternative employment
   with effect from the date of closure at the same remuneration as he was entitled to receive, and on
   the same terms and conditions of service as were applicable to him, immediately before the closure;
       (b) the service of the worker has not been interrupted by such alternative employment; and (c)
   the employer is, under the terms of such alternative employment or otherwise, legally liable to pay
   to the worker, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been
   continuous and has not been interrupted by such alternative employment.
   (3) For the purposes of sub-sections (1) and (2), the expressions “minerals” and “mining operations”
shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in clauses (a) and (d) of section 3 of the Mines
and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (67 of 1957).

   (4) Where any undertaking set up for the construction of buildings, bridges, roads, canals, dams or
other construction work is closed down on account of the completion of the work within two years from
the date on which the undertaking had been set up, no worker employed therein shall be entitled to any
compensation under clause (b) of section 70, but if the construction work is not so completed within
two years, he shall be entitled to notice and compensation under that section for every completed year
of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months.

How to apply this provision

  1. Primary statutory test — (1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70, as if the worker had been retrenched:
  2. Additional operative limb — Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
  3. Qualification / exception to test — Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.
  4. Numerical or timing control — Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings.—(1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in…
  5. Evidence file — retain facts and records proving the role/status of: Employer, Worker.
Why this is section-specific: the operative-clause, exception, threshold and cross-reference panels above are extracted from Section 75 itself rather than a generic “trigger/control/evidence” template.

Rules, forms and cross-references

Direct 2026 Central Rule mapping

Forms mapped

No prescribed form is directly mapped in the current concordance.

Other sections cited in this text

A direct concordance is not exhaustive. Central/State jurisdiction, schemes, authority appointments, saved instruments and later notifications may change the practical route without changing the section wording.

Worked example

Suppose an industrial establishment reaches a step governed by compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings. HR/IR should create a dated file showing coverage, the competent authority/union status, required notice or application, service proof and the result. One operative text point to test is: “Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings.—(1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to t” Also test the express qualification/proviso before concluding the result.

Illustration only; it is not statutory text or a substitute for applying the actual facts, jurisdiction, current rule/scheme and official instrument.

Q&A — Section 75

What does Section 75 of the Industrial Relations Code cover?

Section 75 — Governs compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings and the rights, duties, powers or procedure expressly stated in this section. Key operative text: (1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the…

What is the main legal requirement or power in Section 75?

The first operative clause identified from the official text is: “(1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70, as if the worker had been retrenched:” Read it with the remaining subsections and any proviso below.

Does Section 75 contain a proviso or explanation?

Yes. A qualification extracted from the official text is: “Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer, the compensation to be paid to the worker under clause (b) of section 70, shall not exceed his average pay for three months.”

What time limit, percentage or amount appears in Section 75?

The provision contains this numerical/time expression: “Compensation to workers in case of closing down of undertakings.—(1) Where an establishment is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in…” Apply it only in the clause and context in which it appears.

Which 2026 Central Rules are linked to Section 75?

No direct Central Rule is recorded in the current concordance. That does not exclude a relevant scheme, notification, State rule or enabling provision.

Is Section 75 currently operative?

All provisions were brought into force from 21 November 2025 under S.O. 5320(E); use the current India Code consolidation because the Code also reflects the 2026 amendment/transition framework.

Source & verification trail

Act: Industrial Relations Code, 2020 — official India Code PDF ↗

Central Rules: Industrial Relations (Central) Rules, 2026 — G.S.R. 342(E), 8 May 2026 ↗

Official library: Ministry of Labour & Employment — Labour Codes ↗

Source check: 20 August 2026. Individual professional interpretation should be re-reviewed when the section, rules, notification, scheme, State overlay or controlling judgment changes.

← PreviousNext →
Reliance note: This page is an educational legal-reference layer. Verify the current official text, the applicable Central/State rules, notifications, schemes and judicial decisions before acting on a live matter.
Finin2min · Finance & Law Explained in 2 Minutes
Editorial owner: CA Nikhil Gupta · Official-source set checked 20 August 2026; provision-level professional review remains matter-specific
Educational purposes only. Exact notified law, rules, schemes, regulator instruments, judicial decisions, state overlays, portal behaviour and facts must be checked before reliance. Verify with a qualified professional.