Skip to contentSkip to content
Labour litigation issue map

ESI coverage, employment injury and remedy bars

Start with insured-person status, notification, employment nexus and section 53.

Decision path

1
Fix the legal period and forum.
Identify the Act/Code, transition, appropriate Government and territorial jurisdiction.
2
Freeze the evidence.
Preserve appointment, payroll, notices, orders, portal acknowledgements and witness material.
3
Read the controlling cases.
Extract the ratio, paragraph locator, relief, later treatment and factual limits.

Source-closed Supreme Court records

Bangalore Turf Club Limited v Regional Director, ESIC
The Court applied a functional and beneficial interpretation to the establishment’s organised commercial activities and upheld coverage.
Board of Control for Cricket in India v Regional Director, ESIC
The Court treated the activity as systematic and commercial for the relevant notification and upheld the coverage conclusion.
Western India Plywood Ltd v P. Ashokan
The Court applied the statutory bar against recovering compensation or damages under another law for the same employment injury covered by the ESI Act.
Daivshala v Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
The Court held that commuting accidents can qualify where the required nexus between circumstances, time, place and employment is established; it treated section 51E as clarificatory for the interpretive issue examined.

Finin2min checklist

Official starting points: Supreme Court of India · India Code · CGIT-cum-Labour Courts