Skip to contentSkip to content
Supreme Court labour-law citator

Apparel Export Promotion Council v A.K. Chopra

(1999) 1 SCC 759 · 20 January 1999

POSHdisciplinary inquiryunwelcome conduct
Decision in 2 minutes

The Court upheld the disciplinary approach and emphasised that sexual harassment must be assessed through dignity, unwelcome conduct and workplace impact rather than an artificially narrow physical-contact test.

Governing lawService discipline and workplace sexual harassment
Provision focusVishaka principles; constitutional equality and dignity
Judgment date20 January 1999
Source statusOfficial Supreme Court judgment linked

Question before the Court

Whether disciplinary action could be sustained where unwelcome sexual conduct was established without requiring completed physical assault.

Holding and ratio control

The Court upheld the disciplinary approach and emphasised that sexual harassment must be assessed through dignity, unwelcome conduct and workplace impact rather than an artificially narrow physical-contact test.

Pinpoint locator

Official judgment: analysis and conclusion section, pp. 12–19 of the linked PDF.

Open the official Supreme Court judgment ↗

Employer implementation

  • Identify the exact legal period, worker category and governing instrument.
  • Preserve contemporaneous records rather than reconstructing the file after a dispute.
  • Record the reasoned application of the judgment to the actual facts.
  • Check whether a statutory amendment or later decision changes the rule.

Employee and representative lens

  • Preserve appointment, wage, attendance, communication and proceeding records.
  • Identify the correct forum, relief and limitation trigger.
  • Distinguish the binding ratio from fact-specific observations.
  • Obtain the signed order and complete appellate history.

Practical consequence

Inquiry teams should assess the whole course of conduct, power imbalance, credibility and workplace consequences while preserving procedural fairness.

Later-treatment status

Continues to inform POSH and service-law analysis, subject to the statutory definitions and procedure now governing complaints.

Finin2min Q&A

Can this decision be applied without reading the full judgment?

No. Confirm the material facts, governing provision, ratio, relief, bench strength and later treatment in the official signed judgment.

Does a Supreme Court principle automatically decide every employment dispute?

No. The rule is binding within its legal scope, but classification, jurisdiction, commencement and evidence remain matter-specific.

Legal caution: This record is a structured research aid, not a substitute for pleadings, evidence review or professional advice.