HC/SC Judgments · Batch 37
By topic: State VAT & Excise (7) · Customs, Excise & Service Tax (5) · GST (2) · Local taxes (3) · Insolvency & IBC (6) · PMLA & Enforcement (1) · Arbitration & Commercial Disputes (10) · Banking, SARFAESI & Debt Recovery (1) · Income Tax (2) · Stamp Duty, Property & RERA (2) · Employment & Social Security (1) · Securities Law (1) · Judgment hub · Search judgments
41 court rulings, each linked to its complete public judgment copy. Decisions dated 2026-02-04 to 2026-10-15. Also see: Batch 34 (50) · Batch 35 (50) · Batch 36 (50).
- Axis Bank Limited v. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka High Court · 2026-07-29 · SALES TAX REVISION PETITION NO.215 OF 2018 · monthly rentals Axis Bank charged merchants for card-swiping machines were a deemed sale by transfer of the right to use goods under the KVAT Act. - Audi Automobiles & Ors. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Indore
Supreme Court of India · 2026-08-13 · Civil Appeal Nos. 10504-10506 of 2017 · the extended period under section 11A could not be used against vehicle body-builders, as the Department knew the chassis cost basis. - KANWAL CHAUDHARY v. INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OFINDIA & ORS.
Delhi High Court · 2026-08-13 · W.P.(C) 9410/2021 · an advocate's fees as an insolvency professional fall under service code 998241, not legal services, so GST is payable on forward charge. - Ruchira Papers Ltd. v. HPSEBL & Another
Himachal Pradesh High Court · 2026-08-07 · CWP No. 9360 of 2025 · the Electricity Duty Act, 2009 does not charge duty on energy a consumer generates on its own diesel sets for its own use. - COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI v. M/S DIEBOLD SYSTEMS (P) LTD.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-08-06 · CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4708-4711 OF 2008 · service tax could not be levied on a notional 33% of the price of turnkey ATM supply and installation contracts before 1 June 2007. - Srinivasa Reddy Velagala v. Sravanthi Infratech Pvt Ltd
Supreme Court of India · 2026-08-12 · Civil Appeal No. 876 of 2021 · an operational creditor's section 9 application on an EPC contract suspended since 2011 was time-barred, as default occurs once. - Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Gujarat High Court · 2026-10-14 · R/Special Civil Application No. 7085 of 2025 · an IGST demand of Rs. 43,43,12,441 on a federation's head-office expenses not cross-charged to branches was quashed. - UNION OF INDIA v. SHRI LAXMAN T. ADVANI
Delhi High Court · 2026-10-14 · MISC. APPEAL (FEMA) 9/2026 · the ED's FERA penalty against a trader failed for want of proof of any foreign-exchange dealing; the reverse burden arises only after proof. - Manoj Punamchand Oswal v. Vijay Omkarmal Gandhi & Anr.
Bombay High Court · 2026-09-30 · Criminal Revision Application No. 11 of 2010 · a Rs.8.5 lakh cash loan enforced through a dishonoured cheque held good despite Income Tax Act cash-transaction limits; conviction upheld. - M/S. SHRI LAKSHMI VENKATARAMANA YAJAMANA INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-30 · WRIT APPEAL NO.935 OF 2026 · cashew processors who lost before the DRT and DRAT for want of pre-deposit could not use a writ to attack their loans' NPA classification. - Zydus Healthcare Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Sikkim High Court · 2026-10-14 · W.P.(C) 39/2022, 13/2024 and 50/2025 · a reassessment notice issued after three years solely on a revenue audit objection is without jurisdiction and barred under section 149(1)(b). - M/s Super Power Steels v. The Himachal Pradesh Tax Tribunal & Anr.
Himachal Pradesh High Court · 2026-10-12 · Cr. Revision No. 82 of 2026 · no revision under section 48 of the HP VAT Act lies against the Tribunal's refusal to rectify an order under section 47(1). - Sandeep Chandrasenan and Anr v. Usha Krishnakumar and Ors
Kerala High Court · 2026-10-15 · WP(C) No. 15055 of 2026 · alleged share transferees named on the company's own transfer forms should have been impleaded in the NCLT mismanagement petition. - Loknath Prasad Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.
Calcutta High Court · 2026-10-13 · WPA 4002 of 2026 · a transfer of an assessee's income tax case from Kolkata to Delhi under section 127, based on one temporary advance, was quashed as arbitrary. - Kumar Housing Corporation Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-08-20 · Writ Petition No. 13655 of 2017 · a deficit stamp duty demand of Rs. 2,60,49,475 on a 2012 conveyance was quashed, as linked agreements formed a single transaction. - M/s. 3F Industries Ltd. v. M/s. Mahalakshmi Trading Corporation
Madras High Court · 2026-08-19 · CRP No. 6542 of 2025 and CMP No. 32321 of 2025 · an MSME Facilitation Council award for a commission claim was set aside, as no arbitration was begun after conciliation failed. - D. Chandran v. S. Anilkumar and Anr
Kerala High Court · 2026-08-07 · Crl. A No. 932 of 2021 · a cheque written in different inks is not invalid, and the accused's admission of borrowing and signed cheques led to conviction and a fine. - T. Unnikrishnan v. Ratheek K and Anr
Kerala High Court · 2026-08-05 · Crl.M.C No. 4003 of 2026 · a cheque complaint filed by a society's secretary is not defective merely because his name appears before the society's name in the cause title. - PROTIMA DUTTA KALITA v. SMTI RINA BORGOHAIN
Gauhati High Court · 2026-08-05 · Crl.Rev.P./412/2025 · a cheque-dishonour notice that only advises payment satisfies section 138; the word demand is not mandatory. - MS PHARMACEUTICALS v. NITYAM PHARMA
Delhi High Court · 2026-07-10 · CRL.M.C. 1676/2025 · a cheque-bounce complaint was revived after the Sessions Court quashed the summons because the demand notice asked less than the cheques' total. - George P.O v. M Nissamudheen and Anr
Kerala High Court · 2026-07-08 · Crl A No. 1077 of 2018 · a cheque notice is not invalid because the signature on the postal acknowledgment differs from the cheque; the acquittal was reversed. - Francis T Chacko v. T.K Sajeevan
Kerala High Court · 2026-07-30 · RFA No. 13 of 2016 · the dismissal of a Rs.16 lakh cheque-based money suit rested on assumptions about blank cheques; the decree was set aside and the suit remanded. - Dr. Sagar Raghunath Phatkare v. Smt. Nandini Ashok Rao and Anr
Bombay High Court · 2026-06-29 · Criminal Writ Petition No. 4384 of 2016 · three cheque-bounce complaints filed by a widow on cheques issued to her late husband were quashed, as she was not payee or holder in due course. - M/s. Vestige Marketing Private Limited v. The Union Territory of Puducherry
Madras High Court · 2026-07-24 · T.C.(R). No.48 of 2016 · herbal capsules and oils sold as food supplements could not be taxed at 5% as Ayurvedic medicines; the 14.5% residuary rate stood. - Ajay Gupta and another v. Can Bank Factors Limited
Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-20 · CRM-M-45498-2019 (O&M) · a cheque-dishonour complaint against directors survives the company's insolvency moratorium and liquidation, as held in P. Mohanraj. - Hawkins Cookers Ltd. v. The State of Assam and Ors.
Gauhati High Court · 2026-07-17 · Revn.Pet./1/2025 · Hawkins Cookers must pay 12.5% VAT on the original sale price and cannot cut the price to treat the 4% it collected as tax-inclusive. - Sri C. Girish, M/s Jai Gurudev Road Carriers v. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Zone-II), Bengaluru
Karnataka High Court · 2026-07-15 · STA No. 7 of 2018 · surrender of a transit pass does not stop a section 53(12) KVAT penalty where goods, documents and conduct suggest attempted evasion. - Kanda Wine v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. connected with Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Himachal Pradesh High Court · 2026-07-06 · CWP No. 9721 of 2023 with CWP No. 115 of 2024 · a liquor licensee that ran its vends and then defaulted on licence fee could not use a writ to challenge cancellation under the Excise Act. - M/s India Heritage Foundation v. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka High Court · 2026-07-08 · SALES TAX REVISION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2023 · a builder could not obtain a 4% VAT rate on iron and steel in works contracts when it had declared 12.5% and filed no revised return. - Commissioner of Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Vikaram Cement
Supreme Court of India · 2026-02-05 · Civil Appeal No(s). 710/2012 · the 2024 CBIC monetary limit of ₹2 crore for Government appeals also applies to appeals already pending; the State's appeal was dismissed. - South East U.P. Power Transmission Company Limited v. Prescribed Authority and 4 others
Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-24 · 1 WRIC No. - 19391 of 2023 · pre-insolvency electricity dues not claimed in the CIRP or part of the approved plan stand extinguished under sections 31 and 238 of the IBC. - M/s Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Kerala High Court · 2026-03-05 · WP(C)NO.20484 OF 2020 · the State could not make acceptance of Harrisons Malayalam's land tax conditional on its title suits, though payment of tax confers no title. - Anil Kumar Gilra v. State of Odisha and Anr
Orissa High Court · 2026-03-13 · Crl MC No. 4645 of 2024 · a former director's plea to quash a criminal breach of trust case over late provident fund deposits was refused though dues were later paid. - BHARTIYA MAZDOOR SANGH, U.P. & ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Supreme Court of India · 2026-04-15 · WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 392 OF 2015 · Gannon Dunkerley could not use Article 142 or legitimate expectation to legitimise its dealings with Jaipur Udyog's assets; workmen's dues first. - Komtech Plastic Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Zrii Technologies Inc.
Karnataka High Court · 2026-04-07 · COMAP No. 502 of 2025 · a Rs.1.22 crore refund claim assigned from a Canadian company was time-barred, and the shares cannot be registered without offer to members. - Satinder Singh Bhasin v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
Supreme Court of India · 2026-04-02 · Miscellaneous Application No. 239 of 2024 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 242 of 2019 · the Grand Venice promoter's bail was cancelled and his Rs. 50 crores deposit forfeited, as he did not settle with homebuyers within time. - Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi, South Commissionerate v. M/S Bureau Of Energy Efficiency
Delhi High Court · 2026-02-26 · SERTA 3/2026 · a Revenue appeal on whether service tax is leviable on statutory fees lies to the Supreme Court, not the High Court. - Principal Commissioner Of CGST v. M/S Pro-Interactive Services India Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court · 2026-02-27 · SERTA 12/2026 · the CESTAT's limited remand to verify embassy certificates for a service-tax exemption on guarding services raises no question of law. - Subrata Bhattacharya v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Ors
Supreme Court of India · 2026-02-19 · Civil Appeal No. 13301 of 2015 · 106 sets of applications against Judge R.S. Virk's recommendations in the PACL investor-refund case go to SEBI Recovery Officers on documents. - Commissioner of Central Excise & ST CGST, Daman, Vapi v. KEC International Ltd.
Bombay High Court · 2026-02-04 · Central Excise Appeal No 9 of 2025 · no substantial question arose from the CESTAT's finding that KEC International substantially complied with exemption conditions. - Schaeffler India Ltd. v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & Ors
Bombay High Court · 2026-02-18 · WRIT PETITION NO. 7496 OF 2023 · stamp duty on an NCLT Mumbai order sanctioning a composite merger is charged on that one order, subject to the Rs.25 crore cap.