HC/SC Judgments · Batch 34
By topic: GST (3) · Customs, Excise & Service Tax (5) · PMLA & Enforcement (9) · Insolvency & IBC (22) · Competition & Consumer Law (1) · Employment & Social Security (1) · State VAT & Excise (4) · Income Tax (1) · Arbitration & Commercial Disputes (1) · Securities Law (1) · Banking, SARFAESI & Debt Recovery (1) · Stamp Duty, Property & RERA (1) · Judgment hub · Search judgments
50 court rulings, each linked to its complete public judgment copy. Decisions dated 2026-03-23 to 2026-06-03. Also see: Batch 31 (50) · Batch 32 (50) · Batch 33 (50).
- Dev Trading Company v. Union Of India And 2 Others
Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-21 · WRIT TAX No. - 2664 of 2026 · a wrong rubber stamp below the signature does not invalidate a show-cause notice; the petitioner may file a further reply. - M/s Alupro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-II
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-27 · Civil Appeal No. 8030 of 2010 · excisability disputes go to the Supreme Court under section 35L, not the High Court; cutting and grooving aluminium panels is not manufacture. - SMT. JAYAMMA v. THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Karnataka High Court · 2026-06-02 · WRIT PETITION NO. 28108 OF 2025 · the ED's attachment of MUDA sites based on a bare repetition of the statute was set aside, as section 5(1) needs recorded reasons to believe. - HINDUSTAN MEDICAL INSTITUTION v. BIRLA CORPORATION LTD AND ORS
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-26 · SLP (C) NO. 1182 OF 2023 · in the dispute over Birla Corporation shares held by three societies, the Board of Trustees, not the Managing Committee, holds authority. - SAINIK INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD v. INDIAN SUGAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED
Delhi High Court · 2026-06-01 · CS(COMM) 474/2019 · an operational creditor that took its payout under an approved IBC plan and withdrew its suit gets a full court-fee refund under section 16. - COSMIC CRF LIMITED v. MYOTIC TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-14 · Civil Appeal Nos.4266-4267/2026 · Cosmic CRF Limited was held eligible under section 29A of the IBC to bid for Amzen Transportation Industries, as no overdue NPA dues existed. - DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE (HQS) & ORS. v. GAMESKRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-27 · Civil Appeal Nos. 8241-8244 of 2026 with Civil Appeal No. 8240 of 2026, Criminal Appeal No. 2933 of 2026 and connected writ petitions and transferred cases · GST on online gaming, fantasy sports and casinos is valid as a levy on actionable claims from staking on uncertain outcomes, skill or chance. - KSD ZONNE ENERGIE LLP v. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court · 2026-05-14 · W.P.(C) 13482/2025 · an informant has no right to notice before the CCI closes a complaint under section 26(2); the writ was dismissed with liberty to appeal. - CG Tollway Ltd v Union of India & Ors.
Rajasthan High Court · 2026-05-22 · D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15048/2025 · CG Tollway, a BOT concessionaire, owed GST on construction services supplied to NHAI in barter for toll rights; the toll exemption did not apply. - N Sridhar v. State of Telangana and Anr.
Telangana High Court · 2026-05-01 · Criminal Petition No. 11796 of 2024 · an EPF default prosecution against a managing director was quashed, as his designation alone, without proof of day-to-day charge, is not enough. - DINESH GUPTA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Delhi High Court · 2026-05-30 · BAIL APPLN. 4709/2025 · Dinesh Gupta, ex-MD of Best Foods, accused of laundering a Rs. 1,740.30 crore loan fraud, got bail after ten months as the trial was far off. - SANJAY DAVE v. ANDHRA BANK LTD. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-27 · CIVIL APPEAL NOS.12264-12266 OF 2024 · a resolution applicant whose plan creditors approved could not treat letters of intent as conditional; forfeiture of his Rs. 1 crore stood. - ADITYA ARORA v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & Ors
Karnataka High Court · 2026-04-30 · WRIT PETITION NO. 3143 OF 2026 · a guarantor declared bankrupt may travel abroad only on official duty for an employer, on a short-validity passport and with the NCLT's NOC. - Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited and Ors v. Directorate of Enforcement
Kerala High Court · 2026-05-26 · WP(C) No. 15757 of 2024 · Cochin Minerals and Rutile and four officers failed to quash an ED ECIR and section 50 summons, as a summons is not a cause of action. - Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, Gujarat v. M/s Reliance Industries Limited
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-25 · CIVIL APPEAL NO. 569 OF 2012 · imported n-Hexane is classifiable under Chapter 29 as a chemically defined organic compound and not as motor spirit under Chapter 27. - SHIVA SHAKTI SECURITY SERVICES v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
Calcutta High Court · 2026-05-11 · APOT/316/2023 WITH CP/49/2016 · a pending winding-up petition goes to the NCLT unless something irreversible has occurred; unpaid security contractor bills are not such a stage. - Louis Dreyfus Company India Private Limited v/s. Enforcement Directorate, Government of India
Calcutta High Court · 2026-05-22 · CRR 1145 of 2024 · the ED's money-laundering case against Louis Dreyfus Company India was quashed, since the CBI had cleared the same letters of credit. - Tannia Rikhy & Ors. v. Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court · 2026-05-21 · RFA 32/2023 · landlords who deducted Rs. 5.53 lakh of service tax from a tenant's deposit, after it was time-barred and not owed under the lease, must refund it. - Rishu Shree v. The Union of India and Ors
Patna High Court · 2026-05-18 · Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2942 of 2025 · a second ECIR under the PMLA on different scheduled offences was not quashed as evergreening, and section 50 statements and summons stood. - N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd Throu. Its Rohit K Bhamburdekar and Ors v. The Regional Director (Wr) Ministry Of Corporate Affair And Anr.
Bombay High Court · 2026-04-27 · WRIT PETITION NO. 10782 OF 2024 · section 39(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 is not a fixed-penalty provision, so the Adjudicating Officer must apply the factors in rule 3(12). - BGR Energy Systems Ltd v. Sanghvi Movers Limited
Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2026-05-07 · ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO: 8/2015 · a claimed dispute over Rs. 30 lakh demobilisation charges was not bona fide, and solvency alone did not stop admission of the winding-up petition. - STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. v. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-15 · Civil Appeal No. 3910 of 2016 with Civil Appeal Nos. 3913, 3914 and 3915 of 2016 · Uttar Pradesh could not levy VAT on Reliance gas sold at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh and piped to its buyers; the sale was inter-State. - JAIDEEP ISPAT AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD. v. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Madhya Pradesh High Court · 2026-04-27 · MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 46274 of 2024 · time awaiting the Ministry's instructions did not extend limitation, so a Registrar of Companies' complaint under section 186(13) was quashed. - Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Goods and Services Tax, Bhavnagar v. Officer of Deputy Conservator of Forests
Gujarat High Court · 2026-04-23 · R/Tax Appeal No. 505 of 2025 with R/Tax Appeal No. 506 of 2025 · a Deputy Conservator of Forests collecting entry and permit fees for Gir Forest performs a sovereign function and owes no service tax. - Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 6 & Ors.
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-12 · Civil Appeal No. 9107 of 2012 with Civil Appeal No. 744 of 2013 and Civil Appeal No. 19487 of 2017 · a company's 35% share of gross sale proceeds of an AOP project is taxable as its own revenue, and reassessment on survey documents was valid. - T.H.D.C. India Ltd through its CMD v. State of Uttarakhand & Others
Uttarakhand High Court · 2026-04-27 · SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 149 OF 2021 · the Uttarakhand Water Tax on Electricity Generation Act, 2012 is in substance a tax on generation that a State cannot levy. - Voizzit Technology Pvt Ltd and Anr v. The Director and Ors
Kerala High Court · 2026-06-03 · WP(Crl) No. 74 of 2026 · a petition seeking CBI, ED and NIA probes into Think and Learn Private Limited's insolvency was dismissed for suppressing an earlier PIL. - SRP MINERALS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Telangana High Court · 2026-05-05 · WRIT PETITION No.11193 OF 2024 · a buyer that agreed to the arbitral tribunal cannot challenge an MSME Facilitation Council reference by calling the contract a works contract. - DILIP KUMAR AGRAWAL v. MS BHARAT COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Madhya Pradesh High Court · 2026-04-23 · COMPANY APPEAL No. 12 of 2026 · a liquidation sale where a higher offer came after the auction was sent back to the Company Judge to decide afresh, with the sale deed held back. - NARESH AGGARWAL & ORS v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Delhi High Court · 2026-05-14 · CRL.M.C. 7536/2025 & CRL.M.A. 31546/202 · a PMLA cognizance order passed without notice to the proposed accused, contrary to section 223 BNSS, was set aside by consent. - Angelwoods Apartment Allottees Association versus M Lalitha and another
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-12 · Civil Appeal Nos. 14439-14440 of 2025 · an IBC appeal filed without a certified copy of the order, and without seeking exemption, was incurably defective and should have been rejected. - JONES LANG LASALLE PROPERTY CONSULTANTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED -VERSUS- M. A. LEASING AND CONSRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
Calcutta High Court · 2026-05-06 · C.S. (COM) 171/2025 · time spent on an operational creditor's IBC petition dismissed for a pre-existing dispute can be excluded under section 14(1) of the Limitation Act. - Ocean Deity Investment Holdings v. Sarang Wadhawan & Ors
Bombay High Court · 2026-05-04 · INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2505 OF 2020 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 128 OF 2021 · a Mauritius investor's suit to cancel a 2009 sale of office floors was prima facie an internal management dispute; no receiver or injunction. - Rajkumar Mohansing Bajaj v. Milestone Interactive Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay High Court · 2026-05-04 · COMPANY PETITION NO. 525 OF 2015 · a buyer of a company's Andheri office in 2016, before public notice of the winding-up petition and unaware of it, got the sale validated. - Anil Sugar Candy Works v. State of Rajasthan & Ors
Rajasthan High Court · 2026-05-05 · D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12887/2012 · the Commercial Taxes Department's 2012 search of three Bikaner food firms was upheld, as section 75 of the Rajasthan VAT Act allows it. - Sidharth Harshadbhai Padaliya v. State of Gujarat
Gujarat High Court · 2026-04-29 · Crl Misc Application No. 4324 of 2025 · courts cannot take cognizance of SCRA offences on a police report, only on a complaint by the Government, SEBI or an exchange. - Omkaram Venkata Ramana v. The Union of India & Ors
Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2026-04-23 · WRIT PETITION NO: 8420 of 2026 · a promoter's writ to undo Bank of India's NPA classification was misconceived, as it sought to bypass SARFAESI and IBC proceedings. - Manjeet Singh son of Ujagar Singh v. The Chief Controller Revenue Authority & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-04-29 · WRIT PETITION NO. 13113 OF 2022 · stamp duty of Rs. 3,00,100 paid on a wrong e-stamp scheme code could not be forfeited because the refund application was two months late. - Digambar Kamat, Churchill Alemao v. Directorate of Enforcement
Bombay High Court · 2026-05-04 · CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.22/2024 · the PMLA Special Court's cognizance of the ED's complaint could not stand without prior sanction under section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. - DR. BAIS SURGICAL AND MEDICAL INSTITUTE PVT. LTD. & ORS. v. DHANANJAY PANDE
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-04 · CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8973 OF 2010 · an investor whose money was used as share capital, but was never entered in the register, could sue for oppression under sections 397 and 398. - Alpha Corp Development Private Limited versus Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) and others
Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-05 · CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1526 OF 2023 · in Earth Infrastructures' insolvency the Court lifted the corporate veil, restored the Roma and Alpha plans and disallowed GNIDA's penal interest. - Prakash Chandra Yadav v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court · 2026-04-30 · MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 19/2024 · receiving Rs. 30 lakh in rupees by cheque from an NRE account was not dealing in foreign exchange under FERA; the Rs. 5 lakh penalty fell. - My Ideal Transport and another v. Transport Commissioner Maharashtra and others
Bombay High Court · 2026-04-22 · WRIT PETITION NO.3237 OF 2026 · RTOs cannot demand pre-liquidation motor vehicle tax from IBC auction purchasers as a condition for transferring vehicles. - Kaizen Power Limited v. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Corporation Limited
Telangana High Court · 2026-04-15 · Commercial Court Appeal No 3/2026 · the IBC moratorium did not stop a corporate debtor's arbitration; the order vacating its interim protection over an APIIC lease was set aside. - Tushar Sahu & Ors v. Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Chhattisgarh High Court · 2026-04-22 · MA No. 21 of 2026 with connected appeals (lead appeal MA No. 26 of 2026) · properties bought by a former Collector's family before the alleged offence are not immune from PMLA attachment, which can reach equal value. - GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. GUJARAT HYDROCARBONS AND POWER SEZ LIMITED & ORS.
Gujarat High Court · 2026-04-29 · R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 55 of 2026 · GIDC could not terminate an SEZ land lease or order eviction against a corporate debtor during the IBC moratorium, even for breach of covenants. - Debanjan Hazra v. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office & Ors.
Calcutta High Court · 2026-04-30 · MAT 474 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 · a Look Out Circular issued at the SFIO's request against a former Elder Pharmaceuticals employee in China was quashed, the probe being over. - Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Limited v. The State of Jharkhand, through Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department (now State Tax Department), Jharkhand, Ranchi
Jharkhand High Court · 2026-04-20 · W.P. (T) No. 2396 of 2025 · a ₹6.71 crore VAT refund pending since 2017 must be paid with 6% interest by 5 May 2026 or the Commissioner pays interest personally. - Holoflex Ltd & Anr v. UoI
Delhi High Court · 2026-03-23 · LPA 314/2019 · the Union's review of the ruling that a hologram maker's supply to a unit in the Nokia SEZ was a deemed export for EPCG purposes failed. - Mrs Radha Satish Timblo and Ors v. The Union of India and Ors
Bombay High Court · 2026-04-27 · Criminal Writ Petition No. 6 of 2024 · a Registrar's prosecution of directors under section 217(5) over an auditor's remark that internal audit 'needs to be strengthened' was quashed.