SEBI & Securities Law

Insider Trading Rules Under SEBI PIT Regulations: What Counts as UPSI

Insider Trading Rules Under SEBI PIT Regulations: What Counts as UPSI
CA Nikhil Gupta·July 2026· SEBI (PIT) Regulations, 2015 SEBI COMPLIANCE

Insider trading law doesn't just prohibit trading on secret information — it defines a specific category of information (UPSI) and a specific category of people (insiders and designated persons) with obligations that kick in well before any actual trade happens.

What is Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI)

UPSI is defined as any information, directly or indirectly relating to a company or its securities, that is not generally available and which, upon becoming generally available, is likely to materially affect the price of the company's securities. The regulations specifically list categories that are ordinarily treated as UPSI, including:

Who counts as an "insider"

The regulations distinguish between two overlapping categories:

⚠ Possession, not motive, is the trigger: The core prohibition is on trading while in possession of UPSI — the regulations do not require proving the trade was actually motivated by the UPSI. This is a materially lower bar for a violation than requiring proof of intent, which is why companies build structured compliance processes (trading window closures, pre-clearance) around the mere fact of UPSI access, not around monitoring individual trading motives.

The Structured Digital Database (SDD) requirement

Listed companies are required to maintain a Structured Digital Database recording the details of persons with whom UPSI is shared, along with the nature of the UPSI and the date it was shared — creating an internal audit trail of who had access to specific pieces of UPSI and when, which becomes critical evidence in any subsequent SEBI investigation into suspicious trading.

Trading window closure — the practical, everyday mechanism

Rather than tracking UPSI possession trade-by-trade in real time, companies operationally manage this risk by closing the trading window for designated persons during periods when UPSI is likely to exist (from the end of a quarter until a defined period, typically 48 hours, after results are publicly announced, and during other specific UPSI events) — designated persons are simply barred from trading company securities during these closed periods, regardless of whether they individually possess the specific UPSI in question.

Consequences of a violation

SEBI can impose monetary penalties (which can run into multiples of the profit made or loss avoided through insider trading), disgorgement of gains, and in serious cases, criminal prosecution under the SEBI Act — insider trading is treated as one of the more seriously enforced categories of securities market violations in India.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a company employee automatically an "insider" just by working there?
Not automatically for every employee — "connected person" status depends on having (or being reasonably expected to have) access to UPSI through the association with the company. However, companies typically designate a broader list of "designated persons" (which can include many employees with even occasional UPSI access) who are subject to the more specific trading-window and pre-clearance rules regardless of their exact connected-person status.
Can a designated person trade during a closed trading window if they genuinely don’t possess any UPSI at that time?
The trading window closure is applied as a blanket restriction for the designated category during the closed period, precisely because verifying an individual’s actual state of knowledge in real time is impractical — companies generally do not make individual exceptions during a closed window even where a specific person claims no UPSI access.
Does sharing UPSI with a professional advisor (like a lawyer or auditor) count as a violation?
Sharing UPSI with someone who needs it for legitimate purposes (a "legitimate purpose" exception exists under the regulations) is permitted, but must be recorded in the Structured Digital Database, and the recipient themselves then becomes subject to insider-trading restrictions with respect to that information — sharing is not itself a violation if done for a legitimate business reason and properly documented.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Primary category
SEBI & Securities Law
Official starting point
www.sebi.gov.in
Editorial review date
2026-07-19
Content status
Finin2min explanation; official source controls where facts, law, rates, forms or procedures can change.

Page source links

The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added during the next substantive editorial review.

Home / Insights / Corporate & Company Law
More on Corporate & Company Law
Browse all Corporate & Company Law articles →
Related Articles
SEBI Related Party Transaction Disclosure: When Shareholder Approval Is Required Delisting of Shares Under SEBI Regulations: Voluntary vs Compulsory Route SEBI Whistle-Blower Mechanism: What Listed Companies Are Required to Maintain Buyback of Shares Under SEBI Regulations: Tender Offer vs Open Market Route SEBI Takeover Code: When an Open Offer Is Triggered