SEBI & Securities Law

SEBI Related Party Transaction Disclosure: When Shareholder Approval Is Required

SEBI Related Party Transaction Disclosure: When Shareholder Approval Is Required
CA Nikhil Gupta·July 2026· Regulation 23, SEBI (LODR) Regulations SEBI COMPLIANCE

Not every related party transaction needs shareholders to weigh in — but once a transaction crosses a specific materiality threshold, approval isn't optional, and the related parties themselves are barred from voting on their own deal.

The baseline: audit committee approval for all RPTs

Every related party transaction — regardless of size — requires prior approval of the audit committee. For repetitive, similar-nature transactions expected to recur, the audit committee can grant an omnibus approval for a defined category and value range, rather than approving each individual instance separately, provided the omnibus approval itself meets specified conditions (valid for a limited period, subject to value ceilings, etc.).

When it escalates to shareholder approval: the materiality threshold

A related party transaction is treated as "material" — and therefore requires prior shareholder approval via ordinary resolution, in addition to audit committee approval — where the transaction value exceeds a specified threshold tied to the company's turnover/net worth, subject to an absolute rupee ceiling. The exact numerical threshold has been revised by SEBI over time, so the current figure should be confirmed against the applicable regulation rather than assumed to be static.

⚠ Related shareholders must abstain from voting: Where shareholder approval is required for a material RPT, related parties to the transaction are not permitted to vote on the resolution, regardless of their shareholding — this is a deliberate design feature to ensure the approval genuinely reflects the view of unrelated (minority) shareholders, not simply the controlling/related shareholder rubber-stamping their own transaction.

Why this rule exists

Related party transactions are a well-documented channel through which controlling shareholders can extract value from a listed company at the expense of minority shareholders — overpriced asset sales to promoter-linked entities, underpriced sales of company assets to promoters, disproportionate management contracts, and similar structures. The materiality threshold plus mandatory minority-shareholder approval (with related parties excluded from voting) is specifically designed to give minority shareholders a genuine check on transactions above a size where the risk of value extraction becomes significant.

What counts as a "related party" in the first place

The definition draws on both the Companies Act's related party definition and SEBI's own, generally broader definition under LODR — covering promoters, promoter group entities, directors, KMP, their relatives, and entities in which these persons hold significant influence or control, among other categories. SEBI's definition has been progressively widened over successive amendments to capture indirect and less obvious related-party structures.

Disclosure to shareholders ahead of the vote

Where shareholder approval is sought, the notice must include specific disclosures about the transaction — the related party's identity and nature of relationship, the transaction's material terms, the rationale, and (depending on the nature of the transaction) supporting valuation or fairness opinion details — so that unrelated shareholders have a genuine informational basis to assess the transaction before voting, not just a bare resolution to approve or reject.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a related party transaction below the materiality threshold need any shareholder involvement at all?
Below the materiality threshold, audit committee approval (or an applicable omnibus approval) is sufficient under the LODR framework — shareholder approval is specifically triggered by crossing the materiality threshold, not required for every related party transaction regardless of size.
Can a wholly-owned subsidiary transaction with its holding company trigger the same shareholder approval requirement?
Transactions between a listed holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiary have historically had certain relaxations under the RPT framework, on the reasoning that there is no minority-shareholder conflict risk within a wholly-owned structure — but the specific carve-out conditions should be checked against the current regulation rather than assumed to apply automatically to every subsidiary transaction.
Who determines whether a transaction is "material" — the company itself, or an external party?
Materiality is assessed against the numerical threshold defined in the regulation (tied to turnover/net worth with an absolute cap) — this is a largely objective, formula-based determination the company itself applies, rather than a discretionary judgment call, though classification disputes in edge cases can still arise.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Primary category
SEBI & Securities Law
Official starting point
www.sebi.gov.in
Editorial review date
2026-07-19
Content status
Finin2min explanation; official source controls where facts, law, rates, forms or procedures can change.

Page source links

The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added during the next substantive editorial review.

Home / Insights / Corporate & Company Law
More on Corporate & Company Law
Browse all Corporate & Company Law articles →
Related Articles
Delisting of Shares Under SEBI Regulations: Voluntary vs Compulsory Route SEBI Whistle-Blower Mechanism: What Listed Companies Are Required to Maintain Buyback of Shares Under SEBI Regulations: Tender Offer vs Open Market Route SEBI Takeover Code: When an Open Offer Is Triggered Trading Window Closure Under SEBI Rules: What Designated Persons Must Know