Applied example
An association that filed FC-3C before expiry documents that its July 2025 receipt fell within the extension. Another association that filed only after expiry cannot assume the same relief.
The notices temporarily extended specified certificates where a renewal application had been filed before expiry and remained pending. The protection was date-bound and ended on the stated date or earlier disposal; it did not cure a late renewal application.
| Control | What to establish |
|---|---|
| Trigger | a receipt or utilisation occurred while an otherwise expiring certificate was covered by a 2025 transition notice |
| Evidence pack | certificate, original expiry, FC-3C filing date, acknowledgement, applicable notice, disposal date and transaction chronology |
| Timing | apply the precise notice window, including the earlier-of disposal condition |
| Legal result | The notices temporarily extended specified certificates where a renewal application had been filed before expiry and remained pending. The protection was date-bound and ended on the stated date or earlier disposal; it did not cure a late renewal application. |
An association that filed FC-3C before expiry documents that its July 2025 receipt fell within the extension. Another association that filed only after expiry cannot assume the same relief.
A trust has a facially complete document but one fact conflicts with MHA public notice dated 7 April 2025 and related 2025 validity notices.
Summary: The notices temporarily extended specified certificates where a renewal application had been filed before expiry and remained pending.
certificate, original expiry, FC-3C filing date, acknowledgement, applicable notice, disposal date and transaction chronology, together with the legal conclusion, filing or payment proof and follow-up action.
Page-specific official source | FCRA Act, 2010 | FCRA portal
An extension notice may apply to a defined group of registration certificates; it does not automatically convert every pending renewal into a valid certificate. FCRA validity decisions require both the individual certificate and the exact wording of any later notice.
The MHA Public Notice of 28 March 2025 extended covered registration certificates through 30 June 2025, or earlier disposal of a pending renewal, for specified cohorts. Its notice of 24 June 2025 extended eligible pending cases and certificates expiring in July–September through 30 September 2025, or earlier decision. The 30 September 2025 renewal clarification emphasised timely Form FC-3C filing and that late submission can leave the certificate expired pending a decision. These were period-specific notices: none can be described as extending a certificate automatically through 2026.
For each association, maintain a validity chronology: certificate date, expiry, FC-3C submission and fee confirmation, query reply, decision, statutory notice and donor instalment schedule. Attach the exact official notice to that chronology. If a public website says a validity extension is in force, verify the actual covered period against the MHA instrument rather than applying it mechanically to a future calendar year.
An NGO whose certificate expired in August 2025 cites the 24 June notice to support receiving a grant in December. That instrument refers to a September 2025 cut-off, not an unlimited renewal. The finance team must check the later renewal decision and any new valid notice before a December receipt or utilisation is treated as permitted.