Skip to main contentSkip to content
GST Law Hub
CGST Act Section 14: Change in rate of tax in respect of supply of goods or services | Finin2min

Section 14 - Change in rate of tax in respect of supply of goods or services

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta and Kajri Singh · Last reviewed 30 August 2026

Chapter IV - Time and Value of Supply
ACTIVE
Official source: The controlling wording and amendment notes are maintained by India Code and CBIC. Open consolidated Act PDF.

Finin2min Summary - Section in 2 Minutes

Overrides sections 12 and 13 when the tax rate changes and aligns supply, invoice and payment around the change date. Classify whether supply occurred before or after the rate change. Then apply the six statutory invoice/ payment combinations. Bank-credit date overrides books date where credit is more than four working days after the rate change.

Provision position
Present in current consolidated Act
CGST chapter
Chapter IV — Time and Value of Supply
Legal source control
India Code + CBIC official repositories
Law checked
27 July 2026
How to use this page: Application remains transaction-date sensitive: check commencement, amendment history, Rules, notifications and State/UT overlay before reliance. The official consolidated Act controls the statutory wording; the Finin2min layers explain how to apply and evidence it.

Why Section 14 matters

Section 14 (Change in rate of tax in respect of supply of goods or services) is the section-level control point within Chapter IV — Time and Value of Supply. Time and value decide when GST becomes payable and on what amount. These provisions become especially important when invoice, payment, supply or rate-change dates do not align.

Current-law and amendment control

validation 1 — controlling consolidated Act

India Code — Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Used for the current chapter/section inventory and consolidated provision status.

validation 2 — independent official cross-check

CBIC Tax Information Portal. Use the Act HTML/PDF and amendment history together with current notifications/circulars.

Transaction-date rule: Never treat today’s consolidated wording, a portal screen or an enacted-but-uncommenced amendment as proof of the law that applied on another date. Fix the relevant tax period first.

Official statutory text

The authoritative provision, footnotes and amendment notes are maintained in the official consolidated Act. This analytical page does not re-typeset amendment markers into the running statutory sentence.

Official-source reference reviewed on 2026-07-28. Apply the version and commencement position relevant to the transaction period.

Clause-by-clause / paragraph-wise decode

Overrides sections 12 and 13 when the tax rate changes and aligns supply, invoice and payment around the change date. Classify whether supply occurred before or after the rate change. Then apply the six statutory invoice/ payment combinations. Bank-credit date overrides books date where credit is more than four working days after the rate change.

Section–Rule–Form–Notification–Circular bridge

No direct Rule certified in Repository module. Check notifications, circulars, forms and corresponding State law.

The mapping is a legal concordance, not a round-robin related-link list. It is limited to instruments listed in this repository.

Practical example

Service completed before a rate increase; invoice issued before change but payment received after change. Time of supply is the invoice date, so the old rate applies. PROFESSIONAL ALERT Use documentary evidence for actual supply completion; invoice timing alone does not establish supply date.

Professional alert

Confirm the transaction-date amendment and commencement position before reliance.

Finin2min decision path

  1. Fix the supply date, invoice date and payment date.
  2. Apply the correct goods/services time-of-supply rule.
  3. If the rate changed, test the statutory rate-change rule using the exact dates.
  4. Determine taxable value and prescribed adjustments.
  5. Reconcile the result to invoice and return reporting.

Practical case studies

Case 1 — Section-specific application — A taxpayer encounters an issue involving change in rate of tax in respect of supply of goods or services. The working paper should identify the exact subsection/proviso, linked Rule/Form/instrument, tax period and evidence before recording the conclusion.
Case 2 — Invoice, payment and supply fall on opposite sides of a rate change. Use the statutory time/rate-change sequence rather than the date most convenient to the ERP.
Case 3 — Related entities transact at a value that needs a prescribed valuation test. Document the relationship, consideration and applicable valuation rule.

Accounting, ERP & portal touchpoints

ERP design should retain supply, invoice, payment and rate-effective dates separately; one posting date is not enough for GST timing analysis.

Control: keep the legal conclusion separate from system configuration; document every tax-code/master change and its effective date.

Notice, litigation & evidence risk

Wrong tax point or value can create interest, recipient ITC mismatch and rate disputes. Preserve price terms, payment evidence and rate-notification versions.

Evidence hierarchy: source transaction → books/ERP → statutory return/form → portal acknowledgement → legal working → correspondence/order.

Judicial position — how to read precedent

Start with binding Supreme Court authority, then the jurisdictional High Court, other High Courts and GSTAT where applicable. AAR/AAAR rulings are fact- and jurisdiction-sensitive and should not be presented as universal law. Always check whether a decision has been stayed, reviewed, distinguished or overtaken by amendment.

Open the Finin2min provision citator · Open the connected GST case-law module

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Using invoice date as the universal time of supply.
  • Applying today’s rate to a past transaction.
  • Ignoring non-monetary or related-party valuation rules.
  • Changing ERP tax codes without preserving the effective-date trail.

Questions professionals actually ask

Which GST rate applies when the rate changes between invoice and payment?
Fix the transaction date first, then follow the applicable rate/exemption notification chain. GST rates are effective-date driven, not timeless slabs.
When does GST become payable on this transaction?
Apply section 14 to the exact facts and period, then verify the linked delegated law and official implementation material before concluding.
What amount should be treated as taxable value?
Apply section 14 to the exact facts and period, then verify the linked delegated law and official implementation material before concluding.
Does an advance change the GST tax period?
Apply section 14 to the exact facts and period, then verify the linked delegated law and official implementation material before concluding.

Related law and practical resources

Finin2min takeaway: Section 14 should never be applied alone. Read the exact provision, the connected Rules/forms/instruments, the transaction date, the State/UT overlay and the binding judicial position together.

Implementation checklist

  1. Fix the transaction, taxable period and jurisdiction.
  2. Read every subsection, proviso, explanation and omission marker.
  3. Open the mapped Rule, form, notification and circular.
  4. Test State/UT variation and portal version.
  5. Preserve evidence, approvals, working papers and acknowledgements.
  6. Record the conclusion, assumptions, source date and reviewer.

Evidence and retention checklist

Practical Q&A

What does section 14 regulate?
It regulates change in rate of tax in respect of supply of goods or services. Read the exact text, conditions, exceptions and transaction date together.
Which subordinate law should be checked?
No direct CGST Rule has been listed in this repository. Notifications, circulars, forms and the corresponding SGST/UTGST layer may also apply.
What evidence should be retained?
Preserve the contract or transaction record, invoice or form, portal acknowledgement, payment/ledger evidence, correspondence, legal working and the official source version used.
Can portal behaviour override the statute?
No. Portal functionality is operational evidence; legal entitlement and liability remain controlled by the Act, Rules, notifications and binding decisions.

Source and decision checkpoint

Primary-source starting points already associated with this page