Section 135 - Presumption of culpable mental state
Chapter XIX - Offences and Penalties
ACTIVEOFFICIAL_TEXT_CAPTUREDindex,follow
Source control: The text/status on this page is tied to the official source gateway and the Phase 1 legal-review register. Open official source.
Finin2min Summary - Section in 2 Minutes
In prosecution requiring a culpable mental state, the court may presume it, but the accused may rebut the presumption to the statutory standard.
Exact operative text
135. Presumption of culpable mental state.-In any prosecution for an offence under this Act
which requires a culpable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of
such mental state but it shall be a defence for the accused to prove the fact that he had no such mental
state with respect to the act charged as an offence in that prosecution.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,-
(i) the expression "culpable mental state" includes intention, motive, knowledge of a fact, and
belief in, or reason to believe, a fact;
(ii) a fact is said to be proved only when the court believes it to exist beyond reasonable doubt
and not merely when its existence is established by a preponderance of probability.
Paragraph-wise decode
In prosecution requiring a culpable mental state, the court may presume it, but the accused may rebut the presumption to the statutory standard.
Section-Rule-Form-Notification bridge
No direct Rule certified in Phase 1. Check notifications, circulars, forms and corresponding State law.
The mapping is a legal concordance, not a round-robin related-link list. It is limited to instruments certified in this phase.
Practical example
The accused produces controls, emails and delegation records showing absence of knowledge. These materials are used to rebut the statutory presumption.
Professional alert
Read the provision with its linked Rules, Gazette commencement, delegation, State GST counterpart and binding judicial interpretation before applying it to a live case.
Implementation checklist
- Fix the transaction, taxable period and jurisdiction.
- Read every subsection, proviso, explanation and omission marker.
- Open the mapped Rule, form, notification and circular.
- Test State/UT variation and portal version.
- Preserve evidence, approvals, working papers and acknowledgements.
- Record the conclusion, assumptions, source date and reviewer.
Evidence and retention checklist
- Contract, purchase order, invoice or underlying transaction document.
- Registration, return, ledger, challan and portal acknowledgement.
- Official Act/Rule/notification version used and effective date.
- Internal tax position paper, computation and management approval.
- Correspondence, notices, replies, orders and appeal papers where applicable.
Practical Q&A
- What does section 135 regulate?
- It regulates presumption of culpable mental state. Read the exact text, conditions, exceptions and transaction date together.
- Which subordinate law should be checked?
- No direct CGST Rule has been certified in this phase. Notifications, circulars, forms and the corresponding SGST/UTGST layer may also apply.
- What evidence should be retained?
- Preserve the contract or transaction record, invoice or form, portal acknowledgement, payment/ledger evidence, correspondence, legal working and the official source version used.
- Can portal behaviour override the statute?
- No. Portal functionality is operational evidence; legal entitlement and liability remain controlled by the Act, Rules, notifications and binding decisions.