Section 117 - Appeal to High Court
Chapter XVIII - Appeals and Revision
ACTIVEOFFICIAL_TEXT_CAPTUREDindex,follow
Source control: The text/status on this page is tied to the official source gateway and the Phase 1 legal-review register.
Open official source.
Finin2min Summary - Section in 2 Minutes
Allows appeal to High Court from State Bench orders involving a substantial question of law, subject to
limitation and certification.
High Court formulates substantial question(s) of law.
Appeal period and condonation ceiling are statutory.
Place-of-supply/Principal Bench route differs.
Exact operative text
117. Appeal to High Court.-(1) Any person aggrieved by any order passed by the State Benches of the
Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court and the High Court may admit such appeal, if it is
satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law.
(2) An appeal under sub-section
(1) shall be filed within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date on which the order appealed
against is received by the aggrieved person and it shall be in such form, verified in such manner as may be
prescribed:
Provided that the High Court may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period if it is satisfied that
there was sufficient cause for not filing it within such period.
(3) Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall
formulate that question and the appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated, and the
respondents shall, at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such
question:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the court to
hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it, if it
is satisfied that the case involves such question.
(4) The High Court shall decide the question of law so formulated and deliver such judgment thereon
containing the grounds on which such decision is founded and may award such cost as it deems fit.
(5) The High Court may determine any issue which-
(a) has not been determined by the State Benches; or
(b) has been wrongly determined by the State Benches, by reason of a decision on such question of law as
herein referred to in sub-section
(3).
(6) Where an appeal has been filed before the High Court, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two
Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the
majority, if any, of such Judges.
(7) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the
case shall, then, be heard upon that point only, by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court and
such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case
including those who first heard it.
(8) Where the High Court delivers a judgment in an appeal filed before it under this section, effect shall be
given to such judgment by either side on the basis of a certified copy of the judgment.
(9) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908),
relating to appeals to the High Court shall, as far as may be, apply in the case of appeals under this section.
Paragraph-wise decode
Allows appeal to High Court from State Bench orders involving a substantial question of law, subject to limitation and certification. High Court formulates substantial question(s) of law. Appeal period and condonation ceiling are statutory. Place-of-supply/Principal Bench route differs.
Section-Rule-Form-Notification bridge
The mapping is a legal concordance, not a round-robin related-link list. It is limited to instruments certified in this phase.
Practical example
A State Bench order turns on interpretation of an exemption notification; counsel frames substantial questions of law.
Professional alert
High Court is not a routine re-appreciation forum for every factual dispute.
Implementation checklist
- Fix the transaction, taxable period and jurisdiction.
- Read every subsection, proviso, explanation and omission marker.
- Open the mapped Rule, form, notification and circular.
- Test State/UT variation and portal version.
- Preserve evidence, approvals, working papers and acknowledgements.
- Record the conclusion, assumptions, source date and reviewer.
Evidence and retention checklist
- Contract, purchase order, invoice or underlying transaction document.
- Registration, return, ledger, challan and portal acknowledgement.
- Official Act/Rule/notification version used and effective date.
- Internal tax position paper, computation and management approval.
- Correspondence, notices, replies, orders and appeal papers where applicable.
Practical Q&A
- What does section 117 regulate?
- It regulates appeal to high court. Read the exact text, conditions, exceptions and transaction date together.
- Which subordinate law should be checked?
- Rule 117, Rule 118, Rule 119, Rule 120, Rule 120A, Rule 121. Notifications, circulars, forms and the corresponding SGST/UTGST layer may also apply.
- What evidence should be retained?
- Preserve the contract or transaction record, invoice or form, portal acknowledgement, payment/ledger evidence, correspondence, legal working and the official source version used.
- Can portal behaviour override the statute?
- No. Portal functionality is operational evidence; legal entitlement and liability remain controlled by the Act, Rules, notifications and binding decisions.