Inventory Valuation Methods: FIFO vs Weighted Average Under Ind AS 2
Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 16 June 2026
Two finance teams can buy and sell the exact same inventory, in the exact same quantities, at the exact same prices — and still report different gross profit. The reason: how they assume inventory "flows" through the warehouse for costing purposes.
The Two Permitted Methods Under Ind AS 2
| Method | Assumption | Effect During Rising Prices |
|---|---|---|
| FIFO (First-In-First-Out) | The oldest stock (bought first) is sold first; closing inventory consists of the most recently purchased units | Lower COGS, higher gross profit, higher closing inventory value (at recent, higher costs) |
| Weighted Average Cost | All units in inventory are costed at a single blended average cost, recalculated as new purchases are made | COGS and closing inventory both reflect a blend of old and new costs — smoother, less extreme than FIFO |
Worked Example
A trading company has the following purchase and sale activity for a single product in a month:
| Transaction | Units | Cost per Unit | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening inventory | 100 | ₹200 | ₹20,000 |
| Purchase (Week 2) | 150 | ₹220 | ₹33,000 |
| Purchase (Week 4) | 100 | ₹240 | ₹24,000 |
| Total available | 350 | ₹77,000 | |
| Units sold during month | 250 | — | — |
| Closing inventory (units) | 100 | — | — |
Under FIFO
| Calculation | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| COGS (250 units) | 100 units @ ₹200 + 150 units @ ₹220 | ₹20,000 + ₹33,000 = ₹53,000 |
| Closing inventory (100 units) | 100 units @ ₹240 (most recent purchase) | ₹24,000 |
Under Weighted Average
| Calculation | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average cost per unit | ₹77,000 ÷ 350 units | ₹220.00 |
| COGS (250 units) | 250 × ₹220.00 | ₹55,000 |
| Closing inventory (100 units) | 100 × ₹220.00 | ₹22,000 |
The Impact on Reported Profit
| Metric | FIFO | Weighted Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of goods sold | ₹53,000 | ₹55,000 | ₹2,000 lower under FIFO |
| Closing inventory value | ₹24,000 | ₹22,000 | ₹2,000 higher under FIFO |
| Gross profit (if sales = ₹1,00,000) | ₹47,000 | ₹45,000 | ₹2,000 higher under FIFO |
The same purchases, the same sales, the same selling price — but ₹2,000 of difference in reported gross profit purely from the costing method. In prices that rise consistently over time, FIFO will generally show higher profit and higher inventory values than weighted average; in falling-price environments, the relationship reverses.
Consistency Requirement
Ind AS 2 requires the same cost formula to be applied to all inventories having a similar nature and use to the entity. A company can use FIFO for one product category and weighted average for a genuinely different category (e.g., raw materials vs finished goods, if their nature and use differ), but it cannot switch methods opportunistically between periods to manage reported profit — any change in accounting policy must meet the criteria in Ind AS 8 and be disclosed.
Lower of Cost and Net Realisable Value
Whichever costing method is used, the resulting cost figure is only the starting point — Ind AS 2 requires inventory to be carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value (NRV). NRV is the estimated selling price less estimated costs to complete and sell. If a product becomes slow-moving, damaged, or its selling price falls below cost, it must be written down to NRV with the write-down expensed immediately — this is a common audit focus area, especially for inventory nearing year-end.
Why This Matters Beyond the Balance Sheet
Inventory valuation directly affects working capital metrics discussed in the working capital playbook — inventory days, gross margin trends, and the cash conversion cycle are all sensitive to the costing method chosen. It also interacts with balance sheet analysis, since inventory is often one of the largest current asset line items for trading and manufacturing businesses.
2026 Accuracy & Decision Check
Apply the applicable Ind AS through recognition → measurement → presentation → disclosure
A strong accounting conclusion is not just a journal entry. Identify the unit of account/transaction, recognition trigger, measurement basis, subsequent measurement or reassessment, P&L/OCI/balance-sheet presentation and the disclosures/estimates that explain the judgement. Tax and Companies Act consequences should be analysed separately unless the standard explicitly drives them.
Decision / evidence controls
- Document the fact pattern and accounting policy before calculating the number.
- Separate recognition from measurement and subsequent remeasurement.
- Record significant estimates/judgements and sensitivity where material.
- Tie note disclosures and cash-flow/presentation classification back to the ledger.
Primary-source checks
Frequently Asked Questions
Source and review trail
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.
- Primary category
- Accounting, Audit & Ind AS
- Official starting point
- www.icai.org
Page source links
The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added when available.