An investigation-readiness protocol for summons, search authorisation, document custody, employee interviews, statements, digital access and legal review.
The correct response to a summons or search is neither panic nor obstruction. It is authorised cooperation with disciplined evidence control and professional support.
Section 70 empowers a duly authorised officer to summon a person to give evidence or produce documents in an inquiry.
Proceedings under summons carry statutory seriousness, and false or casual statements can create wider consequences.
CBIC guidelines state that summons should be used judiciously and senior management should not routinely be summoned first merely because of designation where responsible officers can provide evidence.
Search and seizure under section 67 require the statutory authorisation and reasons-to-believe framework.
| Check | What to examine |
|---|---|
| Document | Summons, authorisation, DIN, date and officer. |
| Person | Who has knowledge and authority. |
| Scope | Periods, entities, issues and documents requested. |
| Custody | Originals, copies, devices and access logs. |
| Statement | Question, factual basis, corrections and signature. |
A CFO is summoned for vendor transactions handled by procurement. The company should not ignore the summons, but it can organise the procurement custodian, transaction file and legal support and make a reasoned request about the appropriate knowledgeable person where justified.
Create an investigation team with one coordinator. Preserve the original state of data, suspend routine destruction and maintain a document-production log.
Employees should answer truthfully from personal knowledge, distinguish fact from assumption and request correction of transcription errors before signing. They should not memorise a management narrative.
Identify the GSTIN, tax period, transaction, document and exact statutory question. Review document, person and scope together. Freeze the source data so that later ERP edits do not destroy the evidence used for the decision.
Start with the contract or commercial event. Move through the invoice, receipt or movement evidence, e-invoice or e-way bill, accounting entry, return and electronic ledger. Classify each difference as timing, error, ineligible amount, statutory exception, disputed position or completed correction. Avoid a plug entry whose only purpose is to make two reports equal.
Prepare a concise position note with facts, authority, amount, alternative view and approval. Preserve the filing acknowledgement and update the responsible master data, vendor rule, invoice workflow or monthly checklist. The objective is not only to survive one review but to prevent the same issue in the next period.
GST positions are strongest when the transaction, legal provision, invoice, physical or service evidence, books, return and electronic ledger agree. A portal match without commercial evidence is not a complete control.
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.