Income Tax

Dividend Stripping & Bonus Stripping: Tax Rules Under Section 94(7) and 94(8)

Finin2min Tax Desk·June 2026·7 min readIncome Tax

Buying a stock or mutual fund unit just before a dividend or bonus issue, then selling soon after at a lower price, used to be a popular way to manufacture an artificial tax loss. Sections 94(7) and 94(8) were introduced specifically to shut this down, and they still trip up unwary investors today.

What Is Dividend Stripping?

Dividend stripping refers to the practice of buying shares or mutual fund units shortly before the record date for a dividend, receiving the dividend, and then selling the units shortly after the record date once the unit price drops (as it typically does, roughly by the dividend amount, since the fund's NAV falls after the payout). The investor receives a tax-free or low-tax dividend while booking a capital loss on the sale, which can then be set off against other capital gains, effectively converting taxable gains into a smaller net liability.

Section 94(7): The Anti-Dividend-Stripping Rule

Section 94(7) disallows the capital loss arising from such a transaction if all three of the following conditions are met:

If all conditions are satisfied, the loss is disallowed only to the extent of the dividend or income received. This disallowed loss is added back to the cost of acquisition for future computation, so it is not permanently lost, but it cannot be used to offset gains in the current year.

Worked Example: Dividend Stripping

Anjali and a dividend mutual fundAnjali buys units of a dividend-paying debt mutual fund for Rs 10,00,000 two months before the record date. She receives a dividend (IDCW payout) of Rs 50,000. Six months later (within the 9-month window for mutual funds), she sells the units for Rs 9,40,000, booking a capital loss of Rs 60,000. Because all three conditions of Section 94(7) are met, the loss is disallowed to the extent of the dividend received, i.e. Rs 50,000. Only the remaining Rs 10,000 loss can be claimed as a genuine capital loss; the Rs 50,000 gets added back to her cost base for future reference.

Section 94(8): The Anti-Bonus-Stripping Rule

A related but distinct strategy is bonus stripping. Here, an investor buys units shortly before a company or fund issues bonus shares or units (additional units issued free of cost to existing holders, which dilutes the per-unit value), and then sells the original units at a loss after the bonus issue, while retaining the bonus units to be sold later at a profit (often after holding long enough to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment).

Section 94(8) addresses this for bonus units of mutual funds (and, by similar logic, bonus shares) where:

In this case, Section 94(8) does not allow you to deduct the loss on the original units at all. Instead, the loss is treated as not having arisen, and is added to the cost of acquisition of the bonus units received. This means the loss effectively gets deferred and rolled into the cost basis of the bonus units, reducing the gain (or increasing the loss) when those bonus units are eventually sold.

Worked Example: Bonus Stripping

Vikram and bonus unitsVikram buys 1,000 units of a mutual fund for Rs 10,00,000 (Rs 1,000 per unit) one month before a bonus record date where the fund issues a 1:1 bonus, giving him 1,000 additional units at zero cost. After the bonus, NAV drops to roughly Rs 500 per unit. He sells his original 1,000 units for Rs 5,00,000, booking an apparent loss of Rs 5,00,000. Under Section 94(8), this entire loss is disallowed and instead added to the cost of the 1,000 bonus units, which originally had zero cost. So the bonus units now carry a notional cost of Rs 5,00,000 (Rs 500 per unit), and any future gain on selling them will be computed using this adjusted cost rather than zero.

Why These Rules Matter for Everyday Investors

Many retail investors unknowingly trigger Section 94(7) or 94(8) simply through routine SIP or lump-sum investments timed close to dividend or bonus record dates, without any intent to avoid tax. The provisions apply automatically based on the timing conditions, regardless of intent, so it is worth checking record date calendars before making large purchases in dividend-paying or bonus-prone instruments if you plan to sell within the lookback windows.

📈
Tracking capital gains across multiple trades?Use our capital gains calculator to model the impact of disallowed losses on your overall tax position.
Calculate Capital Gains

Frequently Asked Questions

Do Section 94(7) and 94(8) apply to equity shares as well as mutual fund units?
Section 94(7) explicitly covers both securities (including shares) and units of mutual funds or UTI, with a 3-month lookback and a 3-month (shares) or 9-month (units) lookforward for the sale. Section 94(8) is specifically worded around units of mutual funds and UTI in the context of bonus units, though the underlying anti-avoidance principle is conceptually similar for bonus shares.
Is the disallowed loss permanently lost, or can it be used later?
Under Section 94(7), the disallowed loss is added to the cost of acquisition of the same securities or units, so it effectively reduces a future gain (or increases a future loss) when those units are eventually sold. Under Section 94(8), the disallowed loss on the original units is added to the cost of the bonus units received. In both cases the tax benefit is deferred and reshaped, not entirely eliminated, but it cannot be claimed in the year of the original sale.
How do I know the record date for dividends or bonus issues on my mutual fund units?
Asset Management Companies (AMCs) announce record dates for IDCW (dividend) payouts and bonus unit allotments through notices on their websites and to stock exchanges. If you are planning a purchase or sale close to such dates, checking the AMC's notice board or your fund's factsheet for upcoming record dates can help you avoid inadvertently triggering Section 94(7) or 94(8).