Director's Remuneration: Salary, Sitting Fees and Professional Fees - How Each Is Taxed
Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 17 June 2026
Whether a director is paid through salary, sitting fees, or a professional fee arrangement changes which TDS section applies, which ITR head the income falls under, and even whether GST registration becomes relevant. The classification depends on the nature of the role, not just the label used in the resolution.
Why Classification Matters
A company can compensate its directors in several different ways: as salary to a whole-time director or managing director who is effectively an employee, as sitting fees paid to non-executive or independent directors for attending board meetings, or as professional/consultancy fees to a director who provides services in a non-employee capacity. Each of these is taxed differently, has a different TDS section, and is reported under a different head of income in the director's ITR.
Whole-Time Directors and Managing Directors: Taxed as Salary
Where a director (typically a whole-time director, managing director, or executive director) is under an employer-employee relationship with the company, governed by an employment contract, the remuneration paid is salary income. TDS is deducted under Section 192, the same provision that applies to any employee, based on the director's estimated total income and applicable slab rates (or the chosen tax regime). This income is reported under the head Salaries in the director's ITR, and the director is generally eligible for the standard deduction available to salaried taxpayers.
Non-Executive and Independent Directors: Fees Taxed Under Section 194J
Why the No-Threshold Rule for Director Fees Matters
For most payments under Section 194J, TDS applies only once payments in a year cross a specified threshold. However, for fees and remuneration paid to a director who is not an employee, under Section 194J(1)(ba), TDS at the prescribed rate applies from the very first rupee, regardless of the amount. This means even a modest sitting fee of a few thousand rupees for a single board meeting attracts TDS.
Worked Example
GST Implications for Independent Directors
Fees paid to non-executive/independent directors for services rendered to the company have, under GST law, been treated as a supply of service attracting GST under the reverse charge mechanism, where the company (recipient) is liable to pay GST on such fees, rather than the director charging GST. This is a separate compliance dimension from income tax TDS, and companies need to account for both.
Commission Linked to Profits
Where a director (executive or non-executive) receives a commission calculated as a percentage of the company's profits, in addition to salary or fees, this commission also falls within the scope of remuneration covered by the relevant TDS provisions (Section 192 if part of an employment package taxed as salary, or Section 194J(1)(ba) if paid to a non-employee director), and the company's Articles of Association and Companies Act provisions on managerial remuneration limits become relevant from a corporate law perspective, separate from the tax treatment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Source and review trail
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.
- Primary category
- Income Tax
- Official starting point
- www.incometax.gov.in
Page source links
The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added when available.
Primary sources & related provisions
Statutory provisions referenced in this guide: