Banking, RBI & Payments

Co-Lending Model Under RBI Guidelines: How Banks and NBFCs Share Risk

Co-Lending Model Under RBI Guidelines: How Banks and NBFCs Share Risk
CA Nikhil Gupta·July 2026· RBI Co-Lending Guidelines RBI REGULATION

Banks have the low-cost capital but often lack last-mile reach into underserved borrower segments; NBFCs have the reach and underwriting agility but a higher cost of funds. RBI's co-lending framework exists specifically to let the two combine forces on the same loan.

The basic structure

Under the co-lending model, a bank and an NBFC jointly extend a loan to a borrower, with each participant funding a portion of the loan and sharing in the risk and returns proportionately. The NBFC — typically closer to the borrower given its distribution reach, particularly in underserved and semi-urban/rural markets — generally handles origination, initial due diligence, and ongoing customer-facing servicing, while the bank provides the larger share of funding.

Why this structure exists — the priority sector lending driver

⚠ Priority Sector Lending (PSL) targets are a major driver of co-lending volume: Banks in India are required to meet specified Priority Sector Lending targets (covering agriculture, MSME, and other specified categories) as a percentage of their adjusted net bank credit. Co-lending arrangements with NBFCs that specialise in these underserved segments let banks meet PSL obligations more efficiently by leveraging the NBFC's existing origination capability and borrower relationships, rather than building that last-mile reach independently.

How the funding split typically works

Earlier co-lending guidance commonly referenced an 80:20 structure — the bank funding roughly 80% of the loan, the NBFC retaining roughly 20% on its own books — giving the NBFC meaningful "skin in the game" in each loan it originates (addressing a moral-hazard concern where an originator with no retained exposure might under-diligence borrowers). Subsequent regulatory guidance has allowed more flexible funding-split structures between the bank and NBFC partners, so the specific ratio in a given arrangement should be confirmed against the current applicable framework rather than assumed to always be 80:20.

Interest rate and borrower experience

The borrower typically deals with a single blended interest rate and a single point of contact (usually the NBFC, given its customer-facing role) despite the loan being jointly funded — the co-lending arrangement is meant to be largely invisible to the end borrower, who experiences it as a single loan from a single visible lender rather than a split obligation to two separate entities.

Risk-sharing and default handling

Both the bank and NBFC share credit risk proportionate to their respective funding share in the underlying loan — a default is not simply passed entirely to one party; each co-lender bears loss proportionate to their share, which is the core risk-sharing design (as opposed to a pure origination-and-sell-down model where the originator retains no ongoing risk).

Why NBFCs value this arrangement

Co-lending gives NBFCs access to bank-scale, lower-cost capital to fund a larger loan book than their own balance sheet and cost of funds would otherwise support — letting a well-run NBFC with strong underwriting/origination capability scale lending volume without needing to raise equivalent additional equity or expensive wholesale debt to fund the full loan amount independently.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the borrower know their loan is a co-lending arrangement, or does it appear as a single lender product?
Regulatory guidance requires appropriate disclosure to the borrower about the co-lending arrangement and the identity of both lenders, even though the practical borrower experience (single rate, single point of contact) is designed to be seamless — full transparency about the arrangement structure is still a compliance requirement, not something hidden from the borrower.
Can two NBFCs co-lend together, or does it require a bank and an NBFC specifically?
RBI's co-lending guidelines were specifically framed around bank-NBFC co-lending arrangements, particularly with the priority sector lending objective in mind — a bank's participation is generally central to this specific regulatory framework rather than co-lending being an open structure available to any two lenders.
Who handles loan recovery if a co-lent loan goes bad?
Recovery responsibilities are typically defined in the co-lending agreement between the bank and NBFC, often with the NBFC (given its customer relationship and origination role) taking the lead on recovery efforts, while both parties bear the credit loss proportionate to their funding share regardless of which entity handles the recovery process itself.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Primary category
Banking, RBI & Payments
Official starting point
www.rbi.org.in
Editorial review date
2026-07-19
Content status
Finin2min explanation; official source controls where facts, law, rates, forms or procedures can change.

Page source links

The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added during the next substantive editorial review.

Home / Insights / Banking, Credit & RBI
More on Banking, Credit & RBI
Browse all Banking, Credit & RBI articles →
Related Articles
RBI Master Direction on KYC: Periodic Updation Requirements for Bank Accounts RBI's Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets: What Replaced the Old Circular NBFC Registration With RBI: Which Entities Actually Need It PMLA Explained: What Triggers a Money Laundering Investigation in India Suspicious Transaction Reports (STR): What Banks and NBFCs Must Report to FIU-IND