Skip to content
Finin2min
Knowledge Hubs
Indian LawsCivil Procedure, Evidence and EnforcementThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 › Section 25
Provision-wise corpusSection 25Source-gated

Section 25
Place Of Suing, Transfer And Institution

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: paragraph-wise legal and operational analysis with subordinate-instrument bridge, example, Q&A, evidence and remedy controls.

ActThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
ProvisionSection 25
Themeplace of suing, transfer and institution
AuthorityCivil Courts / High Courts / Ministry of Law and Justice

Dedicated Finin2min Summary - Section in 2 Minutes

Section 25 belongs to the place of suing, transfer and institution part of the statute. The professional control is to identify the legally relevant person, event, document, amount and date; connect the provision to the current subordinate instrument; and preserve a source-dated decision file before acting.

Current statutory text and controlled source map

Primary gateway: official India Code / Government source for The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

This publication identifies Section 25 and supplies the professional interpretation layer. Exact statutory words, inserted or omitted provisions, provisos, explanations, schedules and commencement are controlled by the signed official source. The legal-review register records the final text-reconciliation gate.

Paragraph-wise interpretation framework

Reading stepSection 25 implementation questionRequired evidence
Opening words and scopeWho and what transaction falls within place of suing, transfer and institution?Entity/person status, transaction note and event date.
Operative requirementWhat must be done, prohibited, disclosed, proved or decided?Approval, filing, notice, register, calculation or order.
Conditions and thresholdsWhich cumulative conditions, monetary limits or time periods apply?Independent computation and maker-checker approval.
Proviso, exception and savingDoes an exception alter the main rule for this fact pattern?Exception memorandum with source and reasons.
Consequence and remedyWhat follows from compliance, breach, delay or invalid action?Risk, remedy, forum and limitation working.

Rules, notifications, circulars and forms bridge

Primary related instrument

First Schedule: Orders I-LI and Rules

Confirm enabling section, current version, applicability, form, fee, portal and supersession history.

Instrument hierarchy

Act → amendment/commencement → Rules/Regulations → notification/direction → form/portal → binding judicial interpretation.

Practical example and calculation/control

Scenario 25: A Regulated Entity faces a matter governed by Section 25. The owner classifies the transaction, but the first working paper does not capture the current instrument or event date.

Required correction: prepare a one-page section memo showing facts, statutory trigger, Rule/notification, calculation or timeline, approval, evidence and fallback remedy. The primary failure risk is wrong legal classification.

Practical transaction application

  1. Freeze the facts, parties, asset/right, event date and desired outcome.
  2. Capture Section 25, connected definitions, provisos and schedules from the official source.
  3. Map First Schedule: Orders I-LI and Rules and any State, sector or authority-specific instrument.
  4. Compute amount, deadline, value, period or eligibility where applicable.
  5. Obtain authority, file/pay/serve, preserve acknowledgement and monitor appeal or cure rights.

Authority, consent and execution controls

Stamp duty, registration and filing alerts

Section 25 does not by itself displace applicable stamp, registration, court-fee, filing-fee or State property rules. Test the underlying instrument and forum separately, especially for assignments, licences, settlements, wills, deeds, securities, land and court filings.

Evidence and document-retention checklist

Performance, delivery and payment controls

Performance gate

Map each statutory and contractual milestone to an owner, due date, evidence and escalation.

Financial gate

Reconcile consideration, fee, duty, tax, interest, compensation, penalty and recovery separately.

Breach, loss, mitigation and remedy framework

Classify the breach; determine causation and proof; quantify direct loss, statutory amount, interest and cost; document mitigation; and test cure, appeal, review, rectification, injunction, compensation, confiscation, restitution or prosecution exposure as the statute permits.

Limitation and forum controls

Record accrual, knowledge, service, order, certified-copy, exclusion and filing dates. Confirm subject-matter, territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction, statutory bar, appeal route and whether condonation is legally available.

Arbitration, mediation and settlement interface

Separate non-arbitrable statutory powers and public-law remedies from private disputes. A settlement cannot validate prohibited conduct or defeat mandatory approvals, confiscation, prosecution, environmental restoration, probate or public-right requirements.

Company, LLP, partnership, GST and tax overlays

Practical Q&A

What is the first question under Section 25?

Identify the statutory person, event, asset/right and event date before selecting a form or portal.

Can a contract or internal approval override Section 25?

No. Private arrangements operate only within mandatory statutory limits and valid authority.

What evidence should be retained for Section 25?

The official source snapshot, classification memo, applicable instrument, authority, calculation, filing/service proof and closure or remedy record.

What is the most common failure?

Wrong legal classification, particularly when a professional relies on a portal, old template or commercial label without rechecking current law.

Section-specific decision flow

Facts and event date
Section 25 scope
Instrument and authority
Evidence / calculation
Action, remedy and review
← PreviousNext →