Skip to main contentSkip to content
Income-tax Rules, 2026 · Appendix III

Form 55: Application by a resident assessee to invoke the mutual agreement procedure

Source checked 21 October 2026 · Original author: Finin2min Editorial Desk

Purpose, person and period

Application by a resident assessee to invoke the mutual agreement procedure.

A resident assessee invokes the applicable treaty MAP through Form 55 and its order, reasons and remedy evidence. A MAP request is separate from a domestic appeal and does not itself grant relief.

Period gate: This numbered form belongs to the Income-tax Rules, 2026, effective 1 April 2026. The predecessor 34F is a concordance, not permission to change an earlier-year filing into a new-law form. For earlier periods, use the applicable 1961 Act form and saved procedure.

Official transition guidance

Controlling rule and source pages

Rule 121; . Physical PDF pp 471-472; printed Gazette pp 2003-2004.

Rule 121 — connected rule text

121. Application seeking to give effect to term s of any agreement under section 533(2)(p) and procedure for giving effect to decision under agreement. — (1) Where an assessee, who is a resident of India, is aggrieved by any action of the tax authorities of any country or specified territory outside Indi a which, according to him, is not in accordance with the terms of agreement with such other country or specified territory, he may make an application to the competent authority of India seeking to invoke the mutual agreement procedure, if provided in such agreement, in Form No. 55. (2) Where a reference has been received from the competent authority of any country or specified territory outside India under any agreement with that country or specified territory with regard to any action taken by any income -tax authority in India or by the tax authorities of such country or specified territory, the competent authority of India shall communicate its acceptance or non -acceptance for taking up the reference under mutual agreement procedure to the competent authority of the other country or specified territory. (3) The competent authority of India shall, on issues contained in Form No. 55 or in the reference from the competent authority of a country or specified territory outside India, –– (a) call for the relevant records and additional document from the income -tax authorities or the assessee or his authorised representative in India; or (b) have a discussion with such authorities or assessee or representative, to understand the actions t aken by the income -tax authorities in India or outside that are not in accordance with the terms of the agreements between India and the other country or specified territory. (4) The competent authority of India shall endeavour to arrive at a mutually agr eeable resolution of the tax disputes, arising from such actions of the income -tax authorities, in accordance with the agreement between India and the other country or specified territory within an average time period of twenty-four months. (5) In case th e mutual agreement procedure is invoked on account of action taken by any income -tax authority in India, the resolution arrived at under sub -rule (4) in a tax year shall not result in decreasing the income or increasing the loss, as the case may be, of the assessee in India, as declared by him in the return of income of the said year. (6) If a resolution is arrived at under sub -rule (4) between the competent authority of India and that of the other country or specified territory, the same shall be communicated in writing to the assessee. (7) The assessee shall communicate his acceptance or non -acceptance of the resolution in writing to the competent authority of India within one month from the end of the month in which communication has been received under sub- rule (6). (8) The acceptance of the resolution by the assessee shall be accompanied by proof of withdrawal of appeal, if any, pending on the issues that were the subject matter of the resolution arrived at under sub -rule (4). (9) On receipt of accep tance under sub -rule (7), the competent authority of India shall communicate the resolution arrived at under sub -rule (4) and the acceptance by the assessee along with proof of withdrawal of appeal, if any, submitted by the assessee under sub -rule (8), to the Principal Chief Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner, as the case may be, who in turn shall forward it to the Assessing Officer. (10) On receipt of communication under sub -rule (9), the Assessing Officer shall give effect to the resolution arrived at under sub -rule (4), by an order in writing, within one month from the end of the month in which the communication was received by him and intimate the assessee about the tax payable determined by him, if any. [PDF PAGE 96] 1628 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)] (11) The assessee shall pay the tax as determined under sub-rule (10) within the time allowed by the Assessing Officer and shall submit the proof of payment of taxes to the Assessing Officer, who shall then proceed to withdraw the pending appeal, if any, pertaining to subject matter of the resolutio n under sub -rule (4), which was filed by the Assessing Officer or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or any other income -tax authority. (12) A copy of the order under sub-rule (10), shall be sent to the competent authority of India and to the asse ssee. (13) The amount of tax, interest or penalty already determined shall be adjusted in accordance with the resolution arrived at under sub-rule (4) and in the manner provided under the Act or the rules made thereunder to the extent that such manner is not contrary to the resolution arrived at. (14) For the purposes of this rule, the ―competent authority of India‖ means an officer authorised by the Central Government for the purposes of discharging the functions as provided under this rule.

Completed field illustration

Fictional data, not for filing. A hypothetical Indian resident company asks the competent authority to consider a foreign transfer-pricing adjustment under MAP.

Form field / blockCompleted fictional entry
Part A: applicant / PAN / contactExample Software India Ltd / synthetic ZZZCE0000Z / 10 Model Road, Pune / tax@example.invalid, +91 0000000000
Row 6: status / row 7: TYResident company / 2026-27
Row 8: jurisdiction / row 9: treaty-partner authorityModel Indian jurisdiction / United States Internal Revenue Service, authority role only
Row 10: notice/order date1 September 2028 - hypothetical foreign adjustment notice
Row 11: treaty-inconsistent action allegedYes, an alleged double charge on the same Rs 5,00,000 service profit; allegation only, not an established treaty breach
A-1: notice/orderModel foreign adjustment F-55, no real order
A-2/A-3: reasons and detailed allegationSame service transaction recognised in Indian taxable profit; assumed foreign adjustment is disputed. Actual treaty article, limitation and evidence must be addressed in a real request
A-4/A-5: foreign remedy / evidenceForeign administrative review assumed requested; model review letter only
A-6 / verificationTransaction invoices and Indian computation model / NOT SIGNED

This illustrates the named fields, not every possible schedule. Use the complete official extract for additional applicable fields, annexures and verification. “Not signed” means no professional certification or authority action has occurred.

Reconcile the example

MAP access, presentation time limits and interaction with domestic remedies depend on the applicable treaty and facts. This field model makes no conclusion about admissibility or a competent-authority agreement.

Prepare, furnish and retain

  1. Use the form identity and period above, then determine the person who prepares, issues or verifies it from Rule 121. An authority-issued order is not an applicant filing.
  2. Collect the records that support the actual fields in the example; keep any mandatory schedules and annexures specified in the complete source form.
  3. Reconcile dates, amounts, units and identifiers to the underlying records. Preserve the applicable rule version and any later correcting notification.
  4. Where the rule prescribes electronic furnishing, use the current official utility/schema and authorised verification. A local PDF does not produce a portal acknowledgement.
  5. Retain the submitted version, supporting schedules and actual acknowledgement or issued certificate/order, as applicable. This fictional model supplies none of those evidential outcomes.

Download the correct documents

Official Form 55 source extract Filled sample — fictional field illustration

The official extract preserves source pages; later amendments are supplied with affected forms. Read the April corrigendum where its printed-page corrections apply. The filled field illustration is an educational model and cannot be filed.

Primary sources

Questions readers ask

Does this sample prove approval, filing or a professional conclusion?

No. It completes the named fields using synthetic facts. It has no real signature, DSC, approval or acknowledgement.

Can I use the legacy form number for a current tax-year obligation?

Establish the governing period first. A predecessor number is a cross-reference; earlier-year procedures and current-year forms must be kept distinct.