Skip to main content
Income-tax Act, 2025 | Section 119

Section 119 - Carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases

Section 119 prevents trafficking or automatic transfer of losses in specified ownership changes. It covers partner exit or death, business succession otherwise than inheritance, and 51% voting-power continuity for closely held companies. It then provides narrowly drafted exceptions, including an eligible-start-up shareholder test and specified reorganisations, insolvency plans, Tribunal-approved plans, fund relocation and strategic disinvestment.

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Updated 9 October 2026

Section 119: operativeEffective 1 April 2026Tax Year 2026-27 onwardLegally reviewed 8 October 2026

Current-law control

This page uses the consolidated Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. The Act and Income-tax Rules, 2026 operate from 1 April 2026. Earlier years and saved proceedings remain subject to the repeal-and-savings framework.

Primary statute: Income Tax Department consolidated Act   |   Rules: Notified Income-tax Rules, 2026

2-minute decode

Section 119 prevents trafficking or automatic transfer of losses in specified ownership changes. It covers partner exit or death, business succession otherwise than inheritance, and 51% voting-power continuity for closely held companies. It then provides narrowly drafted exceptions, including an eligible-start-up shareholder test and specified reorganisations, insolvency plans, Tribunal-approved plans, fund relocation and strategic disinvestment.

Who should use this section

Businesses and successors involved in amalgamation, demerger, restructuring, ownership change, search/requisition or other special loss situations This applicability note is specific to section 119.

Old-law bridge

1961 Act sections 78 and 79

The bridge is navigational only. A 1961 Act case or rule is carried forward only after checking wording, transition provisions and the current 2025 Act text.

Professional alert

Exception / professional alert Test beneficial voting power, not only the registered shareholder list. Build a year-by-year cap-table bridge for each loss vintage.

Connected Income-tax Rules, 2026 and Forms

No provision-specific Rule/Form is independently mapped in this tranche. General return, procedure and evidence rules can still apply.

Worked application

A closely held company has ₹60 lakh carried loss. Only 49% of voting power remains beneficially held by the persons who held voting power when the loss arose. Unless an exception applies, the continuity test is not met. An eligible start-up may instead use the original-shareholder continuity route within the statutory ten-year window.

Evidence / compliance checklist

  • Build a section 119 loss ledger showing source, head, tax year of origin, amount used and balance carried forward.
  • Preserve the timely return and assessment/intimation that determines the loss where the statute makes filing a condition (section 119: Carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases).
  • For reorganisations, retain scheme orders, ownership continuity, asset/business continuity and predecessor-successor tax records (section 119: Carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases).
  • Prevent double use by reconciling the carry-forward schedule to each later return before set-off (section 119: Carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases).

Common mistake

Using a single “loss carried forward” figure for section 119 without preserving head/source restrictions, filing conditions and the remaining statutory period.

Recommended approach

For section 119, fix the governing tax year, identify the operative sub-section for “Carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases”, trace every amount to evidence, apply only verified Rule/Form links, and retain a computation that another reviewer can reproduce from the primary source.

Thresholds, periods and timing checkpoints

Judicial / interpretive bridge

No section-specific Supreme Court bridge is included for section 119 unless text-equivalence with the 2025 Act has been checked. Legacy cases should not be transplanted into section 119 merely because the subject is similar.

Related provisions

Current statutory text

119. (1) In case of change in constitution of a firm during a tax year, nothing in this Chapter shall entitle the firm to have carried forward and set off so much of the loss proportionate to the share of a retired or deceased partner as exceeds his share of profits, if any, in the firm in respect of the tax year. (2) If any person carrying on any business or profession has been succeeded in such capacity by another person, otherwise than by inheritance, nothing in this Chapter shall entitle any person other than the person incurring the loss to have it carried forward and set off against his income. (3) Irrespective of anything contained in this Chapter, in case of a change in shareholding during the tax year of a company (not being a company in which the public are substantially interested),— (a) no loss incurred in any year prior to the tax year shall be carried forward and set off against the income of the tax year unless on the last day of the tax year, the shares of the company carrying not less than 51% of the voting power were beneficially held by the persons who beneficially held shares of the company carrying not less than 51% of the voting power on the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred; and (b) regardless of the change in percentage of shareholding, where the company is an eligible start up referred to in section 140, the loss incurred in any year prior to the tax year shall be allowed to be carried forward and set off against the income of the tax year, if— (i) all the shareholders of such company who held shares carrying voting power on the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred, continue to hold those shares on the last day of such tax year; and (ii) such loss has been incurred during the period of ten years beginning from the year in which such company is incorporated. (4) The provisions of sub-section (3) shall not apply— (a) where a change in the voting power and shareholding takes place in the tax year referred to in that sub-section due to death of shareholder or transfer of shares by way of gift to any relative of the shareholder; or (b) where change in shareholding of Indian company, being a subsidiary of foreign company, takes place due to amalgamation or demerger of the foreign company and 51% of the shareholders of amalgamating or demerged foreign company are shareholders of amalgamated or resulting foreign company; or (c) where change in shareholding takes place in a tax year consequent to a resolution plan approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016) and a reasonable opportunity of being heard was afforded to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner; or (d) to a company, its subsidiary and subsidiary of such subsidiary, if— (i) the Board of Directors of such company were suspended by the Tribunal on an application moved by the Central Government under section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) and new directors were appointed by the Central Government under section 242 of the said Act; and (ii) the change in shareholding of such company and its subsidiary, and subsidiary of such subsidiary has taken place consequent to a resolution plan approved by the Tribunal under section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) and a reasonable opportunity of being heard was afforded to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner; or (e) to a company to the extent that a change in the shareholding has taken place during the tax year on account of relocation referred to in section 70(2) (Table: Sl. No. 5.C); or (f) to an erstwhile public sector company where ultimate holding company of such company, immediately after the completion of strategic disinvestment, continues to hold, directly or through its subsidiary or subsidiaries, at least 51% of the voting power of such company in aggregate. (5) Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (4), if the conditions specified in sub-section (4)(f) is not complied with in any tax year after the completion of strategic disinvestment, the provisions of sub-section (3) shall apply for such tax year and subsequent tax years. (6) For the purposes of this section,— (a) a company shall be a subsidiary of another company, if such other company holds more than half in nominal value of the equity share capital of the company; (b) the expression “erstwhile public sector company” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 116(3)(b); (c) “strategic disinvestment” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 116(3)(c)(i); (d) “Tribunal” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in section 2(90) of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013).

Primary-source trail

FAQs

What does section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 cover?

Section 119 covers carry forward and set off of losses not permissible in certain cases. The operative result depends on the exact statutory conditions shown on this page and applies from 1 April 2026, subject to transition/savings provisions.

Who should check section 119?

Businesses and successors involved in amalgamation, demerger, restructuring, ownership change, search/requisition or other special loss situations This applicability note is specific to section 119.

Are there specific Rules or Forms for section 119?

No provision-specific Rule/Form independently mapped in this tranche.

Related Finin2min guides