Skip to main content
Income-tax Act, 2025 | Section 98

Section 98 - "Transfer" and "revocable transfer" defined

The definition is deliberately wider than a registered sale or gift. Any settlement, trust, covenant, agreement or arrangement can qualify. Revocability includes indirect re-transfer and any right to re-assume power over even part of the income or asset.

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Updated 9 October 2026

Section 98: operativeEffective 1 April 2026Tax Year 2026-27 onwardReviewed 8 October 2026
Current-law control

Section 98 is presented using the consolidated Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. The general commencement date is 1 April 2026. Earlier years and saved proceedings may remain governed by the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the repeal/savings framework.

2-minute professional decode

The definition is deliberately wider than a registered sale or gift. Any settlement, trust, covenant, agreement or arrangement can qualify. Revocability includes indirect re-transfer and any right to re-assume power over even part of the income or asset.

Professional checkpoint: Test substance, not labels. Governance rights, vetoes, substitution powers, loan-back mechanisms and related-party arrangements can reveal indirect re-assumption of power.

Who should test this section?

Section 98 is relevant to individuals and family structures when “transfer” and “revocable transfer” defined; advisers should trace the relationship, transfer and beneficiary mechanics instead of relying on ownership labels alone.

Evidence to retain

For section 98, retain relationship records, transfer instruments, consideration evidence, investment/capital-account workings and the attribution calculation connected with “transfer” and “revocable transfer” defined.

1961 Act bridge

Legacy provisionLegacy headingMapping
63"Transfer" and "revocable transfer" defined.Renumbered / mapped

The bridge is a research aid. Legacy case law carries over only after the current wording and transition rules are matched.

Rules and forms linked to this section

No provision-specific Rule was independently mapped from the current Rules register for this section. That does not mean the wider Rules are irrelevant.

Worked application

A deed transfers an investment portfolio to another person, but a side agreement allows the transferor to replace the trustee and direct that 30% of the portfolio be returned. The arrangement can be treated as revocable even though the main deed does not use the word “revocable”.

Common mistake

Under section 98, relationship by itself is neither enough nor irrelevant: clubbing must follow the precise statutory transfer, benefit and attribution conditions for “transfer” and “revocable transfer” defined.

Compliance approach

Identify the statutory trigger for section 98, lock the relevant tax year, reconcile the facts to the operative sub-section, preserve the evidence trail and separately test every linked Rule, Form, Schedule and exception before finalising the return position.

Numeric / timing checkpoints in the operative text

Related provisions

Current statutory text

98. For the purposes of sections 96 and 97, and this section,— (a) “transfer” includes any settlement, trust, covenant, agreement or arrangement; (b) a transfer shall be deemed to be revocable, if— (i) it contains any provision for the direct or indirect re-transfer of the whole or any part of the income or assets to the transferor; or (ii) it, in any way, gives the transferor a right to re-assume power directly or indirectly over the whole or any part of the income or assets.

Primary-source trail

Source status: full Section 98 statutory text in the local source corpus; reconciled to the current consolidated Act control on 8 October 2026.

Related Finin2min guides