Skip to main contentSkip to content

Secretarial compliance calendar

CRA-2: appointment of cost auditor — workflow

Sources checked 21 October 2026 · Original author: CA Nikhil Gupta

Company appoints the eligible cost auditor and files the intimation; shareholder ratification of remuneration is a separate governance step.

Define the obligation before assigning the task

The company intimates the appointment and exact audit scope. Cost-record maintenance, cost-audit applicability and auditor appointment are separate questions.

Substituted form effective 14 July 2025; original appointment for FY2026–27.

Related guide: Form reference and completed fields

Walk the event through the calendar

An assumed covered engineering company makes an original appointment on 15 April 2026 for FY2026–27. Applicability is assumed to have been established from the actual product classification and preceding-year turnover; no threshold is invented by the example.

1. Establish the event and evidence

Test cost-record and cost-audit applicability using actual sector, product and turnover evidence; document any exemption.

2. Prepare the correct document

Obtain consent/eligibility certificate and Board appointment, with precise product and audit scope.

3. Submit and follow through

Use the correct CRA-2 purpose, attach Board resolution, file within the earlier Rule 6(2) limit and retain actual acknowledgement.

Record the controls and reconcile the outcome

Control to recordWorked scenario
4(l) Audit scopeCovered engineering-product cost records for FY2026–27, including allocation and reconciliation schedules.
4(m) Consent and Rule 6(1A) certificateAssumed received before appointment; no real certificate issued.
5 Previous auditorsNo previous-year appointment in this assumed first covered year; not applicable.
Attachment / declarationBoard resolution dated 15/04/2026. Not signed. No DSC, certification, SRN, filing or approval has occurred.

Keep the source and example with the working papers

Official prescribed referenceWorked field example — fictional

This is the same form, version and scenario as the linked detailed reference. The full field table is maintained there; this page concentrates on responsibilities, sequencing and evidence. No sample creates a DSC, professional certification, approval or acknowledgement. It is a static educational illustration with deliberately invalid synthetic identifiers.

Primary authorities and exact locators

Close the task using the actual result

A source kit or e-form does not itself prove the product/turnover applicability test.

Retain the actual submitted or issued version together with the source records described above. If the authority requests a correction or a required approval has not arrived, preserve that status and the response trail; a saved draft is not evidence of completion.