SEBI v. Kishore R. Ajmera
Provision-linked case and enforcement control page.
PFUTP / circumstantial evidencePinpoint-source controlled
Finin2min Summary — in 2 Minutes
Trade pattern, connection and inference require holistic evidence; verify official judgment and later treatment.
Official source and legal ownership
Paragraph-wise Finin2min interpretation
Provision/forum
PFUTP / circumstantial evidence
Principle/control
Trade pattern, connection and inference require holistic evidence; verify official judgment and later treatment.
Pinpoint gate
Do not quote or rely on the proposition until the official order/judgment PDF and paragraph numbers are captured.
Later treatment
Check amendment survival, review/appeal and later judicial treatment.
Practical example
Counsel/compliance builds a chronology, identifies the operative regulation at the event date, links each fact to documentary/trade/system evidence, and records the forum, limitation and later treatment.
Implementation and evidence controls
- Freeze the applicable entity class, product, transaction date and official instrument version.
- Map every control to its legal owner, enabling provision, responsible function, evidence and escalation route.
- Retain Board/committee approval, policy version, system configuration, maker-checker evidence, exception approval and regulatory filing acknowledgement.
- Re-test the control after an amendment, product change, outsourcing change, merger, customer-risk reclassification or supervisory observation.
Practical Q&A
Can a case summary replace the official decision?
No. Capture the official PDF, exact paragraphs and later treatment.
What is the amendment-survival test?
Ask whether the proposition depended on wording since amended or replaced.
How should SAT and Supreme Court cases be linked?
By provision, issue, facts, holding, paragraph pinpoints, appeal status and practical control.