Skip to main contentSkip to content
Environment Esg · EPR module

Audit and verification

Reviewed by CA Divyanshu Sengar · Last reviewed 29 August 2026

How CPCB audits and verifies EPR compliance claims, and what its 2024 audits found.

EPR moduleCurrent source control

Finin2min Summary — in 2 Minutes

How CPCB audits and verifies EPR compliance claims, and what its 2024 audits found.

Official source and legal ownership

Legal ownerMoEFCC / CPCB / SPCB
Source statusOfficially sourced
Review date2026-08-29
Primary sourceAudit and verification

What this covers

CPCB conducts audits of registered producers, importers and recyclers to verify that reported baseline quantities, target computations, and generated/purchased certificates correspond to real, documented activity rather than self-reported figures taken at face value.

How verification works

Audits cross-check portal filings against independent records - sales/GST data for baseline quantities, weighbridge and processing records for recycler certificate generation - and can extend to physical site verification of a recycler's claimed processing capacity and actual throughput.

Why it matters

CPCB's own 2024 audit exercise found several lakh fraudulent EPR certificates across the system and levied compensation of approximately Rs 355 crore in response - concrete evidence that the audit function is not a formality, and that both producers relying on purchased certificates and recyclers generating them carry real exposure if the underlying activity does not hold up to verification.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Official starting point
www.icai.org

Evidence and verification checklist

Before relying on this page

This page is a structured implementation summary, not the operative legal text. Portal or process acceptance of a filing does not by itself establish legal compliance - the underlying classification, authority, evidence and timeline still have to be independently correct. Where the facts are contested, high-value, or time-barred if delayed, verify the current position with the official source and, where appropriate, a qualified professional before acting.