HC/SC Judgments · Batch 27
By topic: Income Tax (11) · Arbitration & Commercial Disputes (3) · Banking, SARFAESI & Debt Recovery (3) · Local taxes (1) · Customs, Excise & Service Tax (10) · GST (11) · PMLA & Enforcement (1) · Stamp Duty, Property & RERA (3) · Banking & Financial Regulation (3) · Black Money Act (1) · Companies Act & Governance (1) · Judgment hub · Search judgments
48 court rulings, each linked to its complete public judgment copy. Decisions dated 2026-09-10 to 2026-10-09. Also see: Batch 24 (45) · Batch 25 (39) · Batch 26 (49).
- Sanjay Nathalal Shah v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 5(2), Mumbai & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-10-05 · Writ Petition (L) No. 29400 of 2026 · limitation under section 153 ran from receipt of the digitally signed High Court order, so the second special audit order was time-barred. - Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai v. Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Ltd.
Madras High Court · 2026-10-05 · TCA.No.433 of 2013 · software licence renewals for 2008-09 were not royalty, so no section 40(a)(ia) disallowance; membership fees were spread over the period. - Farah Khurshed Titina v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(1)(6), Mumbai & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-10-05 · Writ Petition No. 4002 of 2026 · after the Finance Act, 2026 amendment, section 270AA allows a fresh waiver application even for misreporting penalty. - Small Farmers Agri Business Consortium v. Vanilla India Producer Company Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-10-09 · FAO (COMM) 133/2024 · an arbitral award was restored against the company but not its directors, who were not liable for its loan without a guarantee or fraud. - Abhay Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-30 · W.P.(C) 14527/2026 · in a PIL on the lack of a time limit for cancelling duplicate PANs, the petitioner may represent to the CBDT, which must decide in 8 weeks. - Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. Adani Infrastructure Services Pvt. Ltd.
Gujarat High Court · 2026-09-24 · R/Tax Appeal No. 144 of 2016 · no section 14A interest disallowance where interest income exceeded interest expense and borrowed funds were advanced back-to-back. - Indian Overseas Bank v. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax and Ors
Madras High Court · 2026-09-30 · WA No. 3585 of 2023 · the auction purchaser, not the bank, had to pay the known Central Excise encumbrance under Rule 9(7); the attachment was not removed. - State Bank of India v. Raju George and Ors
Kerala High Court · 2026-09-10 · OP(C) No. 2519 of 2026 · a civil court must lift an attachment made after a bank's mortgage; it is not effaced automatically by the SARFAESI sale notice. - Hiteshbhai Pravinchandra Kapashi v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Gujarat High Court · 2026-09-30 · R/Special Civil Application Nos. 12304 of 2019, 12305 of 2019, 863 of 2020 & 11528 of 2020 · Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation could not move shops above 35 sq m into a higher property tax category without State Government sanction. - Aala Shipping Services Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Customs
Madras High Court · 2026-09-25 · W.P. No. 21646 of 2024 with connected petitions · suspensions of customs broker licences under regulation 16(1) CBLR 2018 were set aside; the delay after the offence reports was unexplained. - Preeti Chadha v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 62(1), Delhi & Ors
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-29 · W.P.(C) 580/2024 · a section 153C notice for AY 2016-17 issued in July 2022 was time-barred; the six-year window ran back from the satisfaction note's year. - Shree Aggarsain North Ex Welfare Society v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-28, Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-30 · W.P.(C) 4168/2024 · a section 153C notice for AY 2010-11 issued in February 2024 was beyond the ten-year window and was quashed. - Zoom Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 25(1) & Anr.
Delhi High Court · 2026-10-01 · W.P.(C) 13064/2026 · a challenge to a section 148A(3) order for AY 2020-21 on facts identical to the dismissed AY 2019-20 challenge failed on judicial discipline. - Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-30 · W.P.(C) 9868/2026 with connected petitions · as a special arrangement, over 100 pending Sahara group appeals were restored to the Delhi Bench of the ITAT although assessed at Lucknow. - R. K. Logistics v. Commissioner Of Customs
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-21 · CUSAA 119/2025 · a customs broker's licence already revoked cannot be revoked again in separate proceedings; the penalty issue was remanded to the Tribunal. - Principal Commissioner, CGST Delhi South Commissionerate v. Micromax Informatics Ltd.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-21 · SERTA 2/2026 · court-ordered deposits made during patent litigation were not royalty subject to service tax, and IGST was paid on the settlement royalty. - Devi Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST Delhi South & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-10-01 · W.P.(C) 15557/2024 · the Commissioner could withhold an export refund under section 54(11) CGST while an anti-evasion investigation was pending. - R. K. Logistics v. Commissioner Of Customs
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-21 · CUSAA 120/2025 · revocation of a customs broker's licence for a forged graduation degree was upheld; the regulation 18 penalty does not depend on revocation. - Denis Vanin v. Union of India & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-09-22 · Writ Petition No. 3619 of 2026 · an Indian-registered car shipped back in a container after an overland trip abroad is not a fresh import; a manual bill of entry is allowed. - Shashi Kant Singh v. The Union of India
Patna High Court · 2026-09-28 · Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3060 of 2025 · a duplicate service tax appeal pre-deposit made through ICEGATE must be refunded with 12% interest and costs; section 11B does not apply. - Principal Chief Commissioner of GST and Central Excise v. Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation
Madras High Court · 2026-09-28 · W.A.(MD) No. 2147 of 2021 · Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation is a governmental authority for the service tax Mega Exemption; paddy storage godowns qualify. - Siraj Ahmad v. Union of India and others
Allahabad High Court · 2026-09-25 · WRIT - C No. - 1000173 of 1998 · not registering or filing a complete Rule 174 declaration did not prove suppression, so extended limitation for excise duty could not apply. - JSW Steel Ltd. v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-30 · W.P. Nos. 9583 and 8943 of 2025 · JSW Steel's writ petitions against an Appellate Tribunal order refusing to remand its PMLA appeals were dismissed as not maintainable. - Devi Dayal Aggarwal v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, New Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-29 · W.P.(C) 1565/2011 · a locker held for over thirty years after the tax dispute ended is to be opened, itemised and its keys returned. - Hammad Ahmed v. Abdul Majeed & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-29 · EX.P. 66/2025 with connected applications · in the Hamdard family execution, a request for an independent auditor to file Form 10AB was left to the arbitral tribunal. - Kalpataru Gardens Limited & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-09-29 · Writ Petition No. 1962 of 2026 · time taken by the Collector of Stamps to adjudicate duty on a 999-year lease is excluded in testing timely presentation for registration. - Dhruv Medicos Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner, Central Gst Circle 5, Audit-I, Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-29 · W.P.(C) 10213/2025 · a section 74 GST notice issued after audit was left alone; objections go to the adjudicating authority, and the contempt notice was closed. - State Tax Officer v. Sree Amman Traders & connected matters
Madras High Court · 2026-09-24 · W.A. No. 687 of 2026 with connected writ appeals · following Armour Security, State and Central officers are cross-empowered by section 6 CGST without notification; 22 appeals were remanded. - Bhadramma v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-17 · Criminal Petition No. 2857 of 2025 · a cheque drawn on a bank that has merged into another does not become invalid, so a section 138 complaint on its dishonour was not quashed. - Solanki Tea Company Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-09-29 · Writ Petition No. 948 of 2021 · ₹29.75 lakh stamp duty on a cancelled assignment agreement was ordered refunded under section 47(c)(5); the document's label is not decisive. - Ganga Medical Stores v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit), DGSTO, Bidar & Anr.
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-18 · Writ Petition No. 202258 of 2026 (T-RES) · an ex parte GST order was set aside because the proprietor was pregnant, subject to a 10% deposit, with a fresh hearing from the reply stage. - Sanklecha Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Nitin Madhukar Shewale & Ors.
Bombay High Court · 2026-09-28 · Second Appeal (Stamp) No. 8825 of 2025 with Interim Application No. 7869 of 2025 · a homebuyer's RERA section 18 right to a refund with interest on demand is absolute and cannot wait for the occupation certificate. - Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru North v. Spoton Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-24 · CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2026 · whether a logistics company provides Goods Transport Agency service is a Revenue appeal for the Supreme Court under 35L, not the High Court. - LICHFL Care Homes Limited v. Director General Of Anti-Profiteering, Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-28 · W.P.(C) 13665/2026 · a ₹2.31 crore anti-profiteering order on a Bhubaneswar project was upheld; the remand method differed from that in Reckitt Benckiser. - Fiverose Abdul Majeed Bathurudeen & Anr. v. Commissioner of Customs
Madras High Court · 2026-09-25 · W.P.(MD) Nos. 27107 and 27108 of 2026 · a mother and minor child whose gold was detained at Trichy airport may apply to Customs for its return, with a minor deterrent penalty. - Joydeb Karmakar @ Jaydeb Karmakar v. The Union of India & Ors
Calcutta High Court · 2026-09-24 · WPA 10299 of 2026 · GST registration cancelled for not disclosing bank details under Rule 10A may be restored on proof of bona fides and payment of dues. - Hind Sennoun v. Union of India
Karnataka High Court · 2026-09-16 · Writ Petition No. 16540 of 2021 (T-IT) · Black Money Act: undeclared pre-Act assets are deemed acquired in the year of the first section 10 notice, so a 2018-19 assessment failed. - GFK Mode Private Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
Calcutta High Court · 2026-09-24 · WPA 17247 of 2026 · DRP objections filed on the Monday after a Sunday deadline were timely; an assessment passed without the DRP's directions was set aside. - Ambica Beri v. Forum Atmosphere Flat Owner’s Association
Calcutta High Court · 2026-09-28 · FMAT No. 342 of 2026 · an arbitration clause in a company's articles is an arbitration agreement; a section 9 injunction protected a flat owner's membership. - Indian Bank v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-25 · ARB.P. 1191/2026; CNR No. DLHC010318142026 · SARFAESI section 11 gives statutory arbitration for inter-bank disputes; a sole arbitrator was appointed without the other bank's consent. - Kuldeep Goyal v. Union of India and Others
Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-09-25 · CWP-31964-2026 (O&M) · arresting a taxpayer the morning after an appearance on the Court's own direction was prima facie an overreach and a breach of Article 21. - Jaiwanti v. UoI
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-25 · W.P.(C) 7254/2025 · section 93 of the CGST Act lets penalty be determined against a legal representative after death; the Article 14 challenge failed. - Vertilink Media Solutions Private Limited v. Anti Evasion Branch & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-09-25 · W.P.(C) 13077/2026 · a ₹10.58 crore section 73 demand was not barred by earlier DGGI proceedings, as section 6(2)(b) needs the same subject matter. - G. Sanil Kumar v. Sujith & Anr.
Kerala High Court · 2026-10-08 · Crl. A No. 2002 of 2024 · a cheque given for a time-barred debt revives the liability, so the section 138 acquittal was reversed and a ₹14 lakh fine imposed. - V.P. Sugathan v. Travancore Devaswom Board
Kerala High Court · 2026-10-08 · WP(C) NO. 42585 OF 2024 · a fee-collection contractor who paid GST on the bid could not add GST to the ₹50 fee fixed in the tender or claim it from the Devaswom Board. - The Alleppey Company Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner & Anr.
Kerala High Court · 2026-09-30 · WP(C) No. 30354 of 2024 · a GST show cause notice based on an audit note that only sought explanations, before findings under Rule 101(4), was quashed. - S.S. Enterprises v. UCO Bank & Ors.
Delhi High Court · 2026-10-06 · W.P.(C) 12806/2026 & CM APPL. 59373/2026 · a bank could not freeze a current account for crossing an internal turnover threshold; the RBI KYC Directions give no power to freeze. - Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Best Hawk Infosystems Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay High Court · 2026-10-09 · COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.23653 of 2026 · audited losses, negative reserves and a pending insolvency application justified section 9 security of ₹32.60 crore for a supplier's claim.