The Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S. Rolta Shares And Stocks Pvt. ...
ID: F2J-C-2604 Court: Bombay High Court Case number: INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2012 Decision date: 2018-11-29 DISMISSED
Finin2min decision brief
Bombay High Court ruling in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2012. Operative-order extract: 3 In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Why this ruling matters
This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.
Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked Check required and has not been inferred.
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]
Bombay High Court
The Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S. Rolta Shares And Stocks Pvt. ... on 29 November, 2018
Author: M.S.Sanklecha
Bench: Akil Kureshi, M.S.Sanklecha
itxa-1103-2012-group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-1 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Mahendra Kumar N. Purohit .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1225 OF 2012
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1242 OF 2012
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1243 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-I .. Appellant.
v/s.
Parmes Diamond Exports Pvt. Ltd., .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-11 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Shri Ashok C. Pratap .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 700 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-1 .. Appellant.
v/s.
M/s. Rolta Shares and Stocks Pvt. Ltd., .. Respondent.
S.R.JOSHI 1 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 30/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/12/2018 10:57:14 :::
itxa-1103-2012-group
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1356 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax -14 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Pravin P. Shah .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1357 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax -14 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Pravin Shah Trust (A.O.).) .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1358 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax -14 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Nalin P. Shah (HUF) .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1484 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax -14 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Shri Manan N. Shah .. Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1485 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax -14 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Shri Vimal P. Shah .. Respondent.
S.R.JOSHI 2 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 30/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/12/2018 10:57:14 :::
itxa-1103-2012-group
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax -11 .. Appellant.
v/s.
Shri Kuldeep Singh Nanda .. Respondent.
Mr. P. C. Chhotaray, for the Appellant in all the Appeals.
Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.1103 of 2012 and 700 of
2013.
Mr. S. J. Mehta, for the Respondent in ITXA Nos. 1225, 1242 and 1243 of
2012.
Mr. Ashok Boghani i/b. Ashok Boghani & Co., for Respondent in ITXA
Nos. 1356, 1357, 1358, 1484 and 1485 of 2013.
Mr. Dharan Gandhi, for Respondent in ITXA No. 47 of 2014.
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2018.
P.C:-
All these Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenge the order dated passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2 Mr. Chhotaray, learned Counsel for the Revenue states that he his instructed not to press all these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect involved in all these Appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs.50 lakhs provided under Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11 th July, 2018.
3 In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
S.R.JOSHI 3 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 30/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/12/2018 10:57:14 :::
itxa-1103-2012-group
4 Refund of Court fees, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)
S.R.JOSHI 4 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 30/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/12/2018 10:57:14 :::
Practitioner verification checklist
Confirm the assessment year and the statutory version considered.
Separate the binding ratio from fact-specific findings and procedural directions.
Check territorial jurisdiction, appealability and any later stay, review or reversal.
Reconcile cited sections and monetary thresholds with the law applicable to the user’s period.
Questions answered
What did the court decide?
Bombay High Court ruling in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2012. Operative-order extract: 3 In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Which case and court does this page cover?
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2012, decided by Bombay High Court on 2018-11-29.
Is the complete judgment available?
Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.
What should be checked before relying on this ruling?
Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.