The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - ... vs M/S. J. M. Baxi And Co
ID: F2J-C-2586 Court: Bombay High Court Case number: INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2013 Decision date: 2019-01-22 DISMISSED
Finin2min decision brief
Bombay High Court ruling in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2013. Operative-order extract: 3 Therefore, this all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed.
Why this ruling matters
This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.
Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked Check required and has not been inferred.
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]
Bombay High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - ... vs M/S. J. M. Baxi And Co on 22 January, 2019
Author: M.S.Sanklecha
Bench: Akil Kureshi, M.S.Sanklecha
itxa-1938-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2013
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1940 OF 2013
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1951 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-III .. Appellant.
v/s.
M/s. J. M. Baxi & Co., .. Respondent.
Mr. P. A. Narayanan, for the Appellant in all the appeals.
Ms. Usha Dalal, for the Respondent in all the appeals.
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2019.
P.C:-
All these Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenge the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2 The learned Counsel for the Revenue, states that he has been instructed not to press all these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect in these appeals are less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018.
3 Therefore, this all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed.
S.R.JOSHI 1 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/01/2019 23:22:28 :::
itxa-1938-2013
4 Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)
S.R.JOSHI 2 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/01/2019 23:22:28 :::
Practitioner verification checklist
Confirm the assessment year and the statutory version considered.
Separate the binding ratio from fact-specific findings and procedural directions.
Check territorial jurisdiction, appealability and any later stay, review or reversal.
Reconcile cited sections and monetary thresholds with the law applicable to the user’s period.
Questions answered
What did the court decide?
Bombay High Court ruling in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2013. Operative-order extract: 3 Therefore, this all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed.
Which case and court does this page cover?
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2013, decided by Bombay High Court on 2019-01-22.
Is the complete judgment available?
Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.
What should be checked before relying on this ruling?
Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.