ID: F2J-C-2631 Court: Madras High Court Case number: T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014 Decision date: 2015-06-01 Outcome: DISMISSED
Finin2min decision brief
Madras High Court ruling in T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014. Operative-order extract: Recording the said endorsement dated 1.6.2015, this appeal is dismissed.
Why this ruling matters
This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.
Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked CHECK_REQUIRED and has not been inferred.
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]
Madras High Court
K.Parthasarathy vs The Income Tax Officer on 1 June, 2015
Bench: R.Sudhakar, K.B.K.Vasuki
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 01.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI
T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014
K.Parthasarathy .. Appellant
- Vs -
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1)
31, Krishnaswamy Road
Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam. .. Respondent
Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the order dated 05.06.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, Chennai, made in ITA No.1068/Mds/2011.
For Appellant : Mr. R.Sivaraman
JUDGMENT
(DELIVERED BY R.SUDHAKAR, J.) When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the impugned order has been recalled by the appellate Tribunal in M.P. No.21/2015 and, therefore, this appeal has become infructuous and, accordingly, the same may be dismissed. An endorsement has been made to the said effect on the bundle. Recording the said endorsement dated 1.6.2015, this appeal is dismissed.
(R.S.J.) (K.B.K.V.J.)
01.06.2015
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
GLN
To
1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1) 31, Krishnaswamy Road Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam.
2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Bench Chennai.
R.SUDHAKAR, J.
AND K.B.K.VASUKI, J.
GLN T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014 01.06.2015
Practitioner verification checklist
Confirm the assessment year and the statutory version considered.
Separate the binding ratio from fact-specific findings and procedural directions.
Check territorial jurisdiction, appealability and any later stay, review or reversal.
Reconcile cited sections and monetary thresholds with the law applicable to the user’s period.
Questions answered
What did the court decide?
Madras High Court ruling in T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014. Operative-order extract: Recording the said endorsement dated 1.6.2015, this appeal is dismissed.
Which case and court does this page cover?
T.C.A. NO. 1013 OF 2014, decided by Madras High Court on 2015-06-01.
Is the complete judgment available?
Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.
What should be checked before relying on this ruling?
Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.