Income Tax 1 Kolkata vs M/S Shivam Dhatu Udyog Ltd
ID: F2J-C-2531 Court: Calcutta High Court Case number: ITAT/205/2023 Decision date: 2024-03-22
Finin2min decision brief
Calcutta High Court ruling in ITAT/205/2023. Read the complete court text for the operative result and fact-specific directions.
Why this ruling matters
This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.
Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked Check required and has not been inferred.
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]
Calcutta High Court
Income Tax 1 Kolkata vs M/S Shivam Dhatu Udyog Ltd on 22 March, 2024
Author: Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Bench: T.S. Sivagnanam, Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
OD-1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/205/2023
IA NO: GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA
VS
M/S SHIVAM DHATU UDYOG LTD
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2024.
Appearance :
Ms. Smita Das De, Adv.
...for appellant
Mr. Samarjit Roychowdhury, Adv.
..for respondents.
The Court :- Preference may be made to the order dated 9th February, 2024.
In terms of the said order the Commissioner of Income Tax (Judicial), Calcutta has
filed a report dated 14th March, 2024. For better appreciation the entire report is
extracted hereunder :-
"To
The Registrar, Original side, Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta,
Sir,
Sub: Submission of report in compliance to order dated 19.02.2024 of
the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in the case of PCIT-1, Kolkata,
vs Shivam Dhatu Udyog Ltd [ITAT/205/2023; IA No GA/1/2023,
GA/2/2023]
May it please the Hon'ble Court
This report is submitted with approval of the Pr. CCIT West Bengal and Sikkim
in compliance to direction issued in the order issued by the Hon'ble Court on
19.2.2024 in the case of M/s Shivam Dhatu Udyog Ltd (IA No. GA/1/2023,
GA/2/2023).
2
The Hon'ble Court has been pleased to hear the matter of alleged delay in
payment of advocates bills and alleged inordinate pendency of bills of advocates on
panel of the Income Tax Department. Interim directions have been issued from time to
time to the departmental authorities to rationalize the processes of billing and
payment of counsels. In this matter, Dr Tarun Seem, CIT Judicial, Kolkata, the
Deputy Controller of Accounts, Kolkata and the ZAO, Kolkata have personally
appeared on different dates before the Hon'ble Court to reiterate the sincerity of the
department towards timely and rational handling of the billing issues.
Sir, it is humbly reiterated that all appropriate actions for rationalizing the
billing of counsels have already been taken by the IT Department and following facts
are submitted for kind attention of the court:
1. As on date, there is no inordinate pendency of outstanding bills with the
Income Tax department or the ZAO. No details of inordinate outstanding bills
have been brought on record by any counsel despite repeated requests by the
department calling for the same from each advocate on the panel.
2. There is no inordinate delay in processing of bills of the advocates on panel
by the Income Tax Department. No details of inordinate delay have been
brought on record by any counsel despite repeated requests by the department
to share the same.
3. The operations of the departmental panel of advocates are governed by
Instructions of the CBDT (instruction no 6/2016 and instruction no
7/2016both dated 7/9/2016). The new Instruction no 1/2024 dated 9/2/2024
supersedes instruction no 6/2016. Bills are processed as per these instructions
of CBDT.
a. In all these instructions (old as well as new) the PCIT concerned is the nodal
agency for processing of bills of the advocates.
b. The performance of departmental counsels is reviewed by the jurisdictional
PCIT/CIT as per para 4(x) of instruction no 1/2024 dated 9.2.2024 read with
para 4.1 of Instruction 7/2016 dated 7.11.2016. The report of PCIT/CIT in this
regard is compiled by the CIT, Judicial, for sharing with the CBDT as per para
4.2 of Instruction 7/2016.
3
c. The counsels are required to provide a record of their performance to
CIT, Judicial, Kolkata in Proforma E as per para 7.11 of Instruction 7/2016
dated 7.9.2016, by the 5th of every month.
It is humbly submitted that, in his affidavit, Mr. Smarajit has pointed out
pendency of some bills that relate to the Ministry of Law for the period prior to
19.4.2023. As such, no cases of inordinate delay or inordinate pendency of bills with
the Income Tax
Department has been brought on record before the CIT Judicial, Kolkata, nor
any specific case brought on record before the Hon'ble Court.
Vide order dated 19.02.2024, the Hon'ble Court has found merit in the
suggestion that a single window system should be put in place for the processing and
clearing of the advocates bills for the entire state of West Bengal.
The Pr. CCIT, WB & Sikkim Region, in utmost humility and in compliance to
the direction of the Hon'ble Court has developed the protocol for processing of bills of
advocates through a single window at office of CIT Judicial, Kolkata. This protocol
shall ensure compliance to the CBDT Instructions and ease/rationalize the processing
of bills submitted by the advocates. The protocol has been finalized and shall be put
into operation within the coming weeks.
It is most humbly prayed that the matter of bills of panel counsels may most
kindly be considered for closure and the issues in the tax matter in the appeal taken
up as deemed appropriate.
It is further requested that the counsels may be advised to submit their bills as
per the new procedure when it is introduced and approach the CIT Judicial for any
future grievance in the matter. The advocates on the panel may also be directed to
ensure compliance to the CBDT Instructions so that their bills may be processed in a
timely and accurate manner.
Sd/-14.3.2024
[Dr Tarun Seem]
Commissioner of Income-tax, Judicial, Kolkata"
We are satisfied with the action taken by the Income Tax Department for
streamlining the process of settlement of fee bills of its standing Counsel.
4
Therefore, the report is take on record and the same is accepted and the matter
concerning the settlement of fee bills for standing Counsel of the Income Tax
Department is closed for the present.
Let the department furnish a copy of the report to all the standing Counsel
appearing for the Income Tax Department.
The learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the Ministry of Law and
Justice has filed a report, a copy of which has been handed over to Mr. Samarjit
Roychowdhury. Let these copies also be handed over to the other Counsel appearing
for the Income Tax Department. The learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax
Department are at liberty to file their affidavit in response to the letter in the form of
an affidavit filed by Ministry of Law & Justice.
List the appeal on 19th April, 2024.
.
( T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA,J.) pkd/GH.
Practitioner verification checklist
Confirm the assessment year and the statutory version considered.
Separate the binding ratio from fact-specific findings and procedural directions.
Check territorial jurisdiction, appealability and any later stay, review or reversal.
Reconcile cited sections and monetary thresholds with the law applicable to the user’s period.
Questions answered
What did the court decide?
Calcutta High Court ruling in ITAT/205/2023. Read the complete court text for the operative result and fact-specific directions.
Which case and court does this page cover?
ITAT/205/2023, decided by Calcutta High Court on 2024-03-22.
Is the complete judgment available?
Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.
What should be checked before relying on this ruling?
Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.