Ram Pratap Singh v. Union Of India And 7 Others

Case snapshot

Sections / provisions: Provisions recorded in the judgment

Questions before the Court / Tribunal

• Issue and context: Challenge has been raised to the order dated 27.9.2023 passed by the respondent no. 9, rejecting the petitioner's claim for exemption from GST on motor vehicle purchased by him being a private car. Operative disposition: Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in its present form, leaving it open for the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so
• Which factual, statutory and procedural conditions controlled the requested relief?
• How did the forum apply the governing provisions to the evidence and procedural history recorded in this case?

Material facts and procedural background

9. No challenge has been made to the legislative entry, referred to above. In the prevailing level of technology and in the background of road safety concerns, certain motor vehicles have been adopted for convenient and safe use by persons with orthopedic physical disability.

12. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in its present form, leaving it open for the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so advised.

Appellant / petitioner / assessee submissions

1. Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Naveen Chandra Gupta, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2,3 and 9 and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 to 8.

4. The argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is attractive. A person with disability whether ocular or hearing or locomotor or other disability deserves accommodation to be provided by the society at large and by the State institutions, in particular. It is a self apparent truth that a person born with disability or a person who suffers disability, though remains equal

Revenue / respondent submissions

The judgment does not separately label the respondent’s submissions in an independently extractable passage. No contention is inferred; read the full record.

Court / Tribunal analysis and reasoning

The concise order integrates its reasoning with the operative directions. The complete packaged record controls.

Operative decision and relief

The operative relief must be read from the final paragraphs of the complete packaged judgment.

Ratio and legal principle

The narrow proposition associated with Ram Pratap Singh v. Union Of India And 7 Others concerns issue and context: challenge has been raised to the order dated 27.9.2023 passed by the respondent no. 9, rejecting the petitioner's claim for exemption from gst on motor vehicle purchased by him being a private car. operative disposition: accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in its present form, leaving it open for the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so The proposition cannot be separated from the judgment’s facts, the governing statutory version, the forum’s jurisdiction, and the exact relief recorded in WRIT TAX No. 1213 of 2023.

For working-paper purposes, the decision should be cited only after matching the material facts and reading the passages under the judgment-grounded record above. The editorial outcome label “Dismissed” is a navigation aid; it does not replace the operative order or explain every issue in a multi-issue case.

Why this judgment matters

This decision is relevant when a file raises the same central question identified in the source headnote: Issue and context: Challenge has been raised to the order dated 27.9.2023 passed by the respondent no. 9, rejecting the petitioner's claim for exemption from GST on motor vehicle purchased by him being a private car. Operative disposition: Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in its present form, leaving it open for the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so Its practical value lies in the way the Allahabad High Court connected the governing provisions—Provisions recorded in the judgment—to the procedural posture and evidence before it.

The authority level is High Court. That affects persuasive or binding weight, but authority level alone is never enough. Territorial jurisdiction, statutory period, the identity of the challenged order, and later appellate treatment must all be checked before the case is used in advice, a submission, or litigation strategy.

Practitioner action points

• Begin with the complete judgment and mark the paragraphs supporting the exact proposition relied upon.
• Match the statutory version of Provisions recorded in the judgment and the decision date 2024-01-25; do not assume the current text is identical.
• Compare the notice, assessment, appeal or other procedural sequence with the chronology recorded in this case.
• Verify the stated later-history status and any review, appeal, SLP, curative or rectification proceedings before citation.
• Record why the client’s evidence is materially similar, and also record any fact capable of distinguishing the result.

Does this case match your facts?

Detailed reliance and distinction analysis

Identity check. Confirm that the cited cause title is Ram Pratap Singh v. Union Of India And 7 Others, the proceeding is WRIT TAX No. 1213 of 2023, and the decision is dated 2024-01-25. These fields are taken from the judgment record and should appear exactly in the citation note.

Bench check. The judgment identifies the coram as Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.; Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.. A later order by another bench, a larger bench, or a higher forum may alter the weight or interpretation of the proposition.

Provision check. The source associates the dispute with Provisions recorded in the judgment. The practitioner should place the historical statutory text next to the current text and identify every amendment, proviso, explanation, rule or notification that could change the analysis.

Fact check. The source issue is not a free-standing abstract rule. It arises from the concrete record summarized above. A reliable application note should list the common facts, the different facts, and whether each difference affects jurisdiction, admissibility, limitation, burden, computation or relief.

Remedy check. The recorded result is Dismissed. Where a matter is remanded, set aside, partly allowed, or disposed with directions, the exact operative language is more important than a binary winner/loser label.

History check. The current closure state is REVIEW_APPEAL_SLP_SUBSEQUENT_TREATMENT_CHECK_PENDING. If that state is pending, the page does not assert that no later case exists. It means the check remains open and must be completed at the point of professional reliance.

Section / provision impact

• Provisions in judgment — apply the exact version considered in the judgment.

Case network

• M/S PATANJALI AYURVED LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Allahabad High Court · Dismissed
• Trimurti Fragrances And Flavours Pvt. Ltd. And 6 Others v. Director General Of Goods And Services Tax 2 Others — Allahabad High Court · Dismissed
• Trimurti Fragrances Pvt Ltd. And And 4 Others v. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax And 2 Others — Allahabad High Court · Dismissed
• M/S Universal Enterprises v. Union Of India And Another — Allahabad High Court · Dismissed

Related Finin2min resources

• Case Law Hub
• Search all 792 judgments
• Explore Search, Summons & Arrest

Full judgment and source control

Read / download packaged judgment record

Source class: OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_TEXT_SANITIZED_RENDITION · Repository status: PUBLISH_READY