Skip to main content
FININ2MIN CUSTOMS · TARIFF GUIDE

Customs Tariff Chapter 81: Other base metals; cermets; articles thereof

Section XV - Base metals and articles of base metal

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Updated 5 October 2026

Finin2min Summary — in 2 Minutes

Chapter 81 covers other base metals; cermets; articles thereof. It is a classification chapter of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, not a static duty card. The recurring classification risk is metal-specific headings for tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum, magnesium, cobalt, bismuth, cadmium, titanium, zirconium, antimony, manganese and other critical metals, plus cermets.

A defensible declaration begins with the goods as imported, the Section and Chapter Notes and GRI 1. The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Customs (Import) v Welkin Foods, 2026 INSC 19, reaffirmed that heading terms and legal Notes come first and that later GRIs are sequential tools, not shortcuts.

2026 watch point. From 1 May 2026, rates previously carried through Notification 45/2025-Customs for cobalt powders and tungsten bars/rods are incorporated into the First Schedule with no change in the applicable rate. From 2 February 2026, the exemption for unwrought/waste/scrap/powders of specified gallium, germanium, indium, niobium and vanadium under tariff item 8112 92 00 is consolidated into Notification 45/2025-Customs and the earlier Notification 36/2024-Customs route is omitted. Finance Act 2026 also restructures tariff entries in Chapter 81, so pre-2026 8-digit masters should not be reused without verification.

Heading architecture of Chapter 81

Use this heading map only after reading the applicable legal Notes. Final classification must descend to the live Indian 8-digit tariff item in force on the bill-of-entry date.

Heading(s)Architecture
8101Tungsten (wolfram) and articles thereof
8102Molybdenum and articles thereof
8103Tantalum and articles thereof
8104Magnesium and articles thereof
8105Cobalt mattes and other intermediate products; cobalt and articles thereof
8106Bismuth and articles thereof
8107Cadmium and articles thereof
8108Titanium and articles thereof
8109Zirconium and articles thereof
8110Antimony and articles thereof
8111Manganese and articles thereof
8112Beryllium, chromium, germanium, vanadium, gallium, hafnium, indium, niobium, rhenium, thallium and articles thereof
8113Cermets and articles thereof

Do not fill gaps in the heading sequence with obsolete or deleted headings from old tariff masters. Indian 8-digit subdivisions can also change without altering the broad four-digit heading title.

Legal boundaries and exclusions

Chapter-specific focus: metal-specific headings for tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum, magnesium, cobalt, bismuth, cadmium, titanium, zirconium, antimony, manganese and other critical metals, plus cermets. A short contemporaneous classification memorandum should record the competing heading, the decisive Note or product fact, and why the alternative was rejected.

How to classify goods in this chapter

  1. Freeze the facts before the rate. Collect exact metal/element and purity, unwrought, powder, bar/rod, waste/scrap or article form, alloy/cermet composition, dimensions and manufacturing stage, whether the good is a chemical compound rather than base metal.
  2. Read Section and Chapter Notes. They can exclude goods even where a heading title appears commercially attractive.
  3. Apply GRI 1 first. Match objective goods to heading terms and Notes.
  4. Use GRI 2 only when its trigger exists. Incomplete/unfinished goods and mixtures require careful legal analysis.
  5. Move through GRI 3 and 4 only if earlier rules genuinely fail. Do not manufacture ambiguity to reach a preferred rate.
  6. Apply GRI 5 and GRI 6. Treat containers/cases where relevant and compare subheadings only at the same level.
  7. Lock the material date. Confirm Finance Act, exemption and DGFT code changes effective on the bill-of-entry date.
  8. Calculate duty only after classification. Then test BCD, SWS, import IGST/cess, tariff value, trade remedies, exemption and preference/origin.

2025–26 statutory and tariff update

From 1 May 2026, rates previously carried through Notification 45/2025-Customs for cobalt powders and tungsten bars/rods are incorporated into the First Schedule with no change in the applicable rate. From 2 February 2026, the exemption for unwrought/waste/scrap/powders of specified gallium, germanium, indium, niobium and vanadium under tariff item 8112 92 00 is consolidated into Notification 45/2025-Customs and the earlier Notification 36/2024-Customs route is omitted. Finance Act 2026 also restructures tariff entries in Chapter 81, so pre-2026 8-digit masters should not be reused without verification.

The 2026 review must be read together with the Finance Act, 2026, Notification 02/2026-Customs and the consolidated exemption structure that refers back to Notification 45/2025-Customs. A tariffisation can move an applied rate into the First Schedule without changing the percentage; a code split can alter declaration architecture even where the effective duty is unchanged.

DGFT Notification 24/2026-27 dated 22 July 2026 synchronised ITC(HS) 2022 Schedule-I with Finance Act 2026 changes. For an affected tariff line, check customs classification and import-policy code together rather than copying a pre-July 2026 master.

Duty, exemption, origin and trade-remedy layer

After the 8-digit CTI is fixed, calculate import incidence independently. Verify the First Schedule BCD, the operative general or specific exemption notification, SWS treatment, import IGST/cess, any tariff value, and anti-dumping, countervailing or safeguard duty that applies to the product, origin and exporter.

A preferential FTA rate is not a classification concession. The correct CTI must first be selected, and the origin claim must independently satisfy the applicable Rules of Origin and CAROTAR evidence requirements. Likewise, do not reverse-engineer a tariff heading from the exemption that produces the lowest duty.

Where a concession is conditional on end use, certification, manufacturing use, importer status or bond procedure, preserve evidence for every condition. An eligible description without evidence of the notification conditions does not establish entitlement.

Import-policy and allied-law controls

For Chapter 81, separately check:

Correct customs classification does not itself establish importability. Restricted/prohibited goods, items requiring licence or NOC, QCO-controlled products, hazardous/waste goods, wildlife-linked products or regulated consumer goods can remain non-clearable despite a technically correct tariff code.

Case law and classification doctrine

AuthorityPrincipleSource
Commissioner of Customs (Import) v Welkin Foods, 2026 INSC 19Start with GRI 1, heading terms and Section/Chapter Notes. Later GRIs are sequential. HSN explanatory material is an important interpretive aid.Supreme Court
Dunlop India Ltd. v Union of India, Supreme Court (1975)Classify the imported article by the tariff language and its objective identity; end use is not decisive unless the entry makes it relevant.Judgment text
Chapter-specific research positionItem-level rulings must be checked against the exact tariff text and material date. No judgment should be used as a substitute for current Section/Chapter Notes.Research cut-off: 5 Oct 2026

Material-date rule: older decisions can retain a useful classification principle while producing a different current result after an HS amendment, Note change or Indian 8-digit restructuring.

Worked example

A shipment described as “critical metal powder” cannot be coded from end use. Identify the element, purity and physical form. For cobalt powder or tungsten bars/rods imported after 1 May 2026, confirm the live First Schedule rate source; for specified 8112 materials, confirm the consolidated exemption conditions effective from 2 February.

A Finin2min-grade working paper should then record: product facts; candidate headings; decisive Note/GRI; selected 8-digit CTI; 2026 effective-date check; exemption/preference tested; DGFT status; allied licences/NOCs/QCO evidence; and the primary-source extracts relied upon.

For repeated high-value imports, keep a controlled product master with revision dates. If the physical specification changes, the classification conclusion must be re-tested rather than mechanically reused.

Evidence and compliance checklist

Common mistakes

Critical metals demand exact elemental and form evidence

Chapter 81 groups many scarce metals that have very different tariff families. A generic “rare metal” or “critical mineral” description is not legally sufficient. The declaration file should hold assay/certificate of analysis, form, particle specification or dimensions, and a manufacturing-stage description.

The 2026 changes are particularly sensitive to master-data lag because both tariffisation and consolidation of exemptions occurred. Where an old ERP points to a repealed exemption notification or old 8-digit split, reconcile it to the Finance Act 2026 schedule and current DGFT ITC(HS) code before filing.

Where the answer depends on a threshold, measurement or constituent material, preserve the underlying test result in the customs file. A conclusion unsupported by the measurable fact is difficult to defend in reassessment, audit or litigation.

Finin2min Q&A

Does this chapter page provide the final customs duty?

No. It provides the legal classification route and highlights current changes. Final incidence depends on the live 8-digit tariff item, exemption, SWS, IGST/cess, trade remedies and preference/origin on the material date.

Can a past bill of entry determine classification?

No. Past clearance can be evidence of practice, but every declaration must remain legally correct for its own product facts and date. A repeated historical error does not become the tariff law.

When should technical testing be obtained?

Before filing when composition, dimensions, species, manufacturing stage, construction, coating or another measurable property controls the heading. Contemporaneous testing is stronger than reconstructing facts after clearance.

When is an advance ruling worth considering?

For repeated or high-value imports with stable specifications where genuine classification uncertainty remains after Notes/GRI analysis, a Customs advance ruling can be considered. The factual description must match the goods actually imported.

Primary sources and current-law trail

Source hierarchy: Gazette/Customs Tariff Act and operative notifications control. DGFT controls import policy. Judicial authorities interpret legal text. Commercial databases and old bills of entry are research aids only.

Professional disclaimer. Educational and professional reference only. Verify the exact Customs Tariff item, effective Finance Act amendment, exemption notification, trade-remedy measure, DGFT policy and product-specific regulatory requirement for the bill-of-entry date before reliance.