Customs Act Section 63: Rent and warehouse charges
Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 30 August 2026

Rent and warehouse charges
At a Glance
Section 63 - Rent and warehouse charges.
For Section 63, Retains the former provision on Rent and warehouse charges for historical-period concordance, savings analysis and pending-proceeding research; it is not presented as operative current law.
Key professional control: For Section 63 — Rent and warehouse charges, 2016 amendment concordance.
Historical Status
Section 63 — Rent and warehouse charges is retained only for date-specific concordance and savings analysis. It must not be applied as operative current law without the historical Gazette and the version governing the proceeding.
Finin2min Decode
Section 63 addresses “Rent and warehouse charges”. It is retained for historical concordance. Its effect depends on the law applicable to the relevant period.
Read Section 63 with the delegated law and instruments that govern historical matters, including the version effective on the transaction date.
Decision question: Does the proposed treatment under Section 63 satisfy the provision-specific conditions for “Rent and warehouse charges”, the connected instrument and the available evidence?
Practical Example
A legacy file cites section 63. The reviewer first fixes the transaction date and then uses the version of the Customs Act then in force, rather than treating the omitted provision as current law.
Professional Alert
For Section 63 — Rent and warehouse charges, 2016 amendment concordance.
This page explains Section 63; it does not reproduce the official provision. Quote only the Customs Act and the exact Rule, Regulation, notification or judgment applicable to “Rent and warehouse charges” for the relevant date.
Decision Steps
- Freeze the relevant date, customs station, goods, person and procedural route.
- Read the current section with definitions, explanations, provisos and cross-references.
- Map delegated legislation, notifications and allied DGFT or partner-agency requirements.
- Test jurisdiction, limitation, conditions, evidence and any burden-of-proof rule.
- Preserve the portal trail but verify the substantive legal entitlement separately.
- Record later amendments, judgments and local procedure before publication or transaction reliance.
Evidence Checklist
- Transaction and proceeding date
- Historical Gazette/amendment record
- Saving or transition provision
- Current successor provision, if any
Common Errors
- Citing an omitted provision as current law
- Ignoring savings and pending proceedings
- Using a present-day portal workflow for an old-period matter
Finin2min Q&A
Section 63 concerns “Rent and warehouse charges”. It is retained for historical concordance. Its effect depends on the law applicable to the relevant period.
For Section 63 — Rent and warehouse charges, 2016 amendment concordance.
No. For Section 63 — Rent and warehouse charges, use this guide to organise the analysis, then rely on the official Customs Act and the connected instrument or binding decision in force for the matter.
Official sources and scope
This page is an analytical or operational guide. The controlling wording, tariff item, notification conditions, portal version and judicial status must be checked in the official source applicable to the transaction date.
- Official record for this item
- India Code - Customs Act PDF
- India Code - Customs Act register
- CBIC Tax Information - Customs
Source review date: 2026-07-28. Historical matters require the law and instrument version applicable to the relevant date.