Skip to main content
FININ2MIN
Customs Act, 1962

Customs Act Section 114AB: Fraudulent instrument

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 30 August 2026

Customs Section 114AB Explained

Fraudulent instrument

XIV - Confiscation and penaltiesCURRENTCA Nikhil GuptaPublished 2026-05-30
Published analytical guide - official law remains controlling.

At a Glance

Section 114AB - Fraudulent instrument.

For Section 114AB, Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

Key professional control: For Section 114AB — Fraudulent instrument, Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

Finin2min Decode

Section 114AB addresses “Fraudulent instrument”. Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

Read Section 114AB with the delegated law and instruments that govern general matters, including the version effective on the transaction date.

Decision question: Does the proposed treatment under Section 114AB satisfy the provision-specific conditions for “Fraudulent instrument”, the connected instrument and the available evidence?

Practical Example

A Customs matter invokes section 114AB on “Fraudulent instrument”. The working paper identifies the exact transaction, person, goods, customs station and date, then tests the section with connected Rules, Regulations, notifications, circulars and evidence.

Professional Alert

For Section 114AB — Fraudulent instrument, Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

This page explains Section 114AB; it does not reproduce the official provision. Quote only the Customs Act and the exact Rule, Regulation, notification or judgment applicable to “Fraudulent instrument” for the relevant date.

Decision Steps

  1. Freeze the relevant date, customs station, goods, person and procedural route.
  2. Read the current section with definitions, explanations, provisos and cross-references.
  3. Map delegated legislation, notifications and allied DGFT or partner-agency requirements.
  4. Test jurisdiction, limitation, conditions, evidence and any burden-of-proof rule.
  5. Preserve the portal trail but verify the substantive legal entitlement separately.
  6. Record later amendments, judgments and local procedure before publication or transaction reliance.

Evidence Checklist

Common Errors

Related Sections

Finin2min Q&A

What does section 114AB address?

Section 114AB concerns “Fraudulent instrument”. Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

What should be verified first for section 114AB?

For Section 114AB — Fraudulent instrument, Evidence, jurisdiction, safeguards and later proceedings must be documented.

Can this page replace the official wording of section 114AB?

No. For Section 114AB — Fraudulent instrument, use this guide to organise the analysis, then rely on the official Customs Act and the connected instrument or binding decision in force for the matter.

Official sources and scope

This page is an analytical or operational guide. The controlling wording, tariff item, notification conditions, portal version and judicial status must be checked in the official source applicable to the transaction date.

Source review date: 2026-07-28. Historical matters require the law and instrument version applicable to the relevant date.