Skip to main contentSkip to content

Companies Act · source-checked form guide

ADT-4: auditor report of fraud to Central Government

Sources checked 21 October 2026 · Original author: CA Nikhil Gupta

The auditor reports a qualifying suspected fraud through the prescribed electronic route; the report must identify the basis, people, amount, records and Board/Audit Committee response.

Which version and who acts?

2025 substituted form and electronic filing requirement effective 14 July 2025.

Auditor under section 143(12), including applicable cost/secretarial-audit provisions; no actual allegation is made here.

G.S.R.359(E), physical PDF p18, Rule 13(2)(d) substitution and omission of (e)/(f); ADT-4 pp27–30.

Completed field illustration

Fictional example — not for filing. Wholly fictional: on 1 August 2026 an auditor identifies a suspected ₹1.20 crore diversion through duplicate vendor invoices. It is reported to the Board on 2 August, the response arrives on 1 September and the draft Government report is dated 10 September.

Prescribed field / blockCompleted fictional entry
Company detailsSYNTHETIC-CIN-01; deliberately not a valid CIN; Aurelia Demonstration Private Limited (fictional)
Auditor particularsExample Learning & Co (fictional firm); no real FRN, PAN or membership asserted
Fraud particularsSuspected duplicate vendor invoices and diversion: ₹1,20,00,000; accounts-payable process, Delhi office.
Period / discoveryTransactions assumed April–July 2026; knowledge obtained 01/08/2026.
Persons involvedFictional employee A and vendor B; no real person or entity accused.
Basis / evidenceInvoice comparison, bank-payment reconciliation and purchase-order exceptions; not an adjudicated finding.
Board/Audit Committee report and responseReport 02/08/2026; response received 01/09/2026 disputing authorisation and proposing independent investigation.
Auditor observationsResponse does not resolve duplicate payment evidence; investigation remains open.
Attachments and verificationRetain initial report, response and supporting papers specified by the source. Not signed. No DSC, certification, SRN, filing or approval has occurred.

The named fields illustrate this scenario. The official reference contains the additional applicable fields, schedules, attachments and declarations. Synthetic identifiers are not valid input for a live filing. No signature, certification, authority action or successful filing is represented.

Check the dates, amounts and legal branch

Prepare, submit and retain the evidence

  1. Apply the individually-qualifying amount test and report to Board/Audit Committee immediately, within two days, seeking response within 45 days.
  2. On response, forward the report and comments within 15 days; if no response within 45 days, forward with the prescribed no-response note.
  3. Use electronic ADT-4 and actual evidence. For below-threshold cases follow the separate Board/Audit Committee reporting and Board-report disclosure rules.

Download the right reference and sample

Official prescribed referenceFilled sample: fictional field illustration

The reference preserves the complete official source document. Use the physical PDF page locators above to find this form; adjacent forms and amendment provisions may share a page. The sample is a static educational model, not an MCA utility, statutory approval or executed filing.

Primary authorities and exact locators

Questions readers ask

What does this PDF complete?

It illustrates the named prescribed fields with fictional facts. The real statutory document must include every applicable field and annexure, supported by actual records and authorised verification.

Does downloading the sample create a filing or approval?

No. Follow the specific preparation and submission steps above. The actual portal acknowledgement, authority decision or signed professional report is separate evidence.

Continue to related material