If you have an open income tax assessment, a pending appeal before CIT(A) or ITAT, or an ongoing reassessment proceeding when the Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect on 1 April 2026, you may be wondering: does my case now fall under a different law entirely? The answer, based on the standard 'savings clause' approach used in major tax law transitions, is reassuring — here's what to expect.
When a tax statute is repealed and replaced, it's standard legislative practice to include a 'savings clause' (or transitional provisions) that preserves the validity of actions already taken under the old law and ensures pending proceedings continue without disruption. Major tax law transitions — including India's GST rollout, which replaced multiple indirect tax statutes — relied on such savings clauses to ensure pending assessments, refunds, and appeals under the old laws continued to be processed under the framework (and often the same authorities) that existed when the proceeding began. The Income-tax Act, 2025 is expected to follow this same approach for income tax proceedings.
| Situation as of 31 March 2026 | Expected Treatment |
|---|---|
| Assessment for FY2024-25 or earlier, not yet completed | Continues to be processed under the framework/procedure applicable when initiated, with section references understood as per the old Act for that period |
| Appeal pending before CIT(A)/ITAT | Continues before the same appellate authority; the substantive law applied is the law as it stood for the relevant assessment year (i.e., the old Act's provisions for pre-FY2026-27 years) |
| Refund due for FY2025-26 (AY 2026-27) or earlier | Processed under the existing refund framework, even if processed after 1 April 2026 |
| Reassessment/reopening notice for old years | Governed by the limitation periods and procedures applicable under the 1961 Act for that assessment year |
| Penalty proceedings initiated before 1 April 2026 | Continue under the provisions applicable when initiated |
Tax professionals handling a mix of old-year disputes and new-year compliance will, for some years, need to operate in both frameworks simultaneously — citing 1961 Act provisions for ongoing disputes about FY2025-26 and earlier, while citing 2025 Act provisions for FY2026-27 compliance. This dual-framework period is expected to last for several years, until all pending matters relating to pre-2026-27 years are resolved through the appellate hierarchy (which can take years for matters reaching ITAT, High Court, or Supreme Court).
For any specific pending matter, the determining factor is the assessment year/tax year to which the dispute relates, not the date on which a particular notice or order is issued. A notice issued in 2027 relating to FY2024-25 (AY2025-26) is governed by the 1961 Act framework for that year; a notice issued in 2027 relating to Tax Year 2026-27 is governed by the 2025 Act. When in doubt, consult a CA familiar with the specific transitional provisions as finally notified.