Crypto and VDA taxation is intentionally ring-fenced. The most expensive mistake is assuming that a loss on one VDA trade can be adjusted against salary, business income, capital gains or even another kind of income in the normal way.
Official Section 115BBH material deals with tax on income from transfer of virtual digital assets. It also restricts deductions other than cost of acquisition and restricts set-off of loss from transfer of VDA against income under any other provision.
| Loss / cost item | Risk control |
|---|---|
| Loss from transfer of VDA | Do not set off against salary, house property, business income or normal capital gains. |
| Mining/staking/platform expenses | Do not deduct unless specifically permitted; official rule focuses on cost of acquisition only. |
| Exchange fees and funding costs | Check whether they form part of acquisition facts; do not take aggressive deductions without support. |
| Loss carry-forward | VDA loss set-off/carry-forward is restricted; preserve exchange reports for disclosure. |
This article is intentionally source-limited to official Income Tax Department / e-Filing material. Verify final filing positions with the latest Act, Rules, circulars and portal utilities before publishing.
No. Section 115BBH restricts set-off of loss from transfer of VDA against income under any other provision.
The official Section 115BBH rule restricts deductions other than cost of acquisition.
Yes. Keep transaction-level reports because AIS/TDS and exchange dashboards may not by themselves explain the full computation.
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.