Section 33 - Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is cancelled or is successfully resisted as being void or voidable. DECLARATORY DECREES
Current statutory text
33. Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is
cancelled or is successfully resisted as being void or voidable.—(1) On adjudging the cancellation of an
instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted, to restore, so far as may be any
benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make any compensation to him which
justice may require.
(2) Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground—
(a) that the instrument sought to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if
the defendant has received any benefit under the instrument from the other party, require him to restore,
so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation for it;
(b) that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his not
having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), the
court may, if the defendant has received any benefit under the agreement from the other party, require
him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has
benefited thereby.
CHAPTER VI
DECLARATORY DECREES
Finin2min clause-by-clause decode
| Clause | Statutory requirement | Finin2min meaning | Evidence/control |
|---|
| Main rule | 33. Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is cancelled or is successfully resisted as being void or voidable.— | Test this main limb within the validity and consent framework. Operational focus: 33. power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is cancelled or. | Contract/deed, authority, chronology, notices, performance and payment records tied to this limb. |
| (1) | On adjudging the cancellation of an instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted, to restore, so far as may be any benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make any compensation to him which justice may require. | Test this (1) within the validity and consent framework. Operational focus: on adjudging the cancellation of an instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is. | Contract/deed, authority, chronology, notices, performance and payment records tied to this limb. |
| (2) | Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground— | Test this (2) within the validity and consent framework. Operational focus: where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground—. | Contract/deed, authority, chronology, notices, performance and payment records tied to this limb. |
| (a) | that the instrument sought to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if the defendant has received any benefit under the instrument from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation for it | Test this (a) within the validity and consent framework. Operational focus: that the instrument sought to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if. | Contract/deed, authority, chronology, notices, performance and payment records tied to this limb. |
| (b) | that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his not having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), the court may, if the defendant has received any benefit under the agreement from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has benefited thereby. CHAPTER VI DECLARATORY DECREES | Test this (b) within the validity and consent framework. Operational focus: that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his. | Contract/deed, authority, chronology, notices, performance and payment records tied to this limb. |
Finin2min implementation explanation
Section 33 is a validity and consent provision dealing with power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is cancelled or is successfully resisted as being void or voidable. declaratory decrees. Identify the actor, trigger, cumulative or alternative conditions, provisos, exceptions and legal consequence before reaching a conclusion.
Implementation control: Preserve negotiations, disclosures and approvals. Test capacity, free consent, lawful object, severability, restitution and ratification as separate questions.
Section-level practical application
Transaction test
Apply this provision to the event-date facts and record every satisfied, disputed or inapplicable limb.
Consequence and remedy
Identify how it changes validity, title, authority, liability, payment, rejection, recovery, registration, evidence or relief.