Skip to main content
Income Tax

Section 80C in FY 2026-27: Now Section 123

CA Nikhil Gupta·Aug 2026·6 min readIncome Tax

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 5 August 2026

The familiar ₹1.5 lakh 80C basket continues through section 123 for Tax Year 2026–27.

Most people know the ₹1.5 lakh number. Far fewer check two things before relying on it: whether their own regime choice still lets them claim it at all, and whether what they actually paid for is on the eligible list in the first place.

Legal or Computational Framework

The restriction most guides bury: this deduction is available only if you file under the old tax regime. If you choose the new tax regime (the default regime unless you actively opt out), none of the payments below reduce your taxable income, no matter how much you actually paid into EPF, PPF, life insurance or a home loan.

Section 123, read with Schedule XV of the Income-tax Act, 2025, consolidates what were separate Sections 80C, 80CCC and the 80CCD(1) component of NPS into one basket sharing the same ₹1,50,000 aggregate ceiling. Commonly claimed items include: EPF/VPF employee contribution, PPF, life insurance premium (subject to a sum-assured-linked cap for policies issued after specified dates), ELSS mutual funds, tuition fees for up to two children, principal repayment of a home loan, 5-year tax-saving bank fixed deposits, NSC, Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana, and the employee’s own NPS contribution under the 80CCD(1) component — the separate additional ₹50,000 NPS deduction under 80CCD(1B) sits outside this ₹1.5 lakh cap and is claimed independently.

Specified investments and payments share this one aggregate ceiling and each has product-level conditions, lock-ins and reversal rules — for example, an ELSS unit redeemed or a life policy surrendered within its lock-in can reverse the deduction already claimed in an earlier year. Employer amounts and home-loan interest (claimed separately, not under this section) are not automatically included.

Core working: First confirm you are on the old regime. Then test each eligible item, remove non-qualifying charges, aggregate, and cap at ₹1,50,000 and eligible gross total income.

Why the result is fact-sensitive

The same keyword can produce different answers because residence, age, employment terms, service period, contribution payer, deposit type, income composition, tax regime and documentation differ. Payroll terminology is not always statutory terminology. A calculator must therefore state the legal definition used for salary, wages, contribution, deposit, deduction or exemption.

Step-by-step method

  1. Identify the governing tax year and statute.
  2. Confirm taxpayer category, residence and regime.
  3. Classify every input under the correct current provision.
  4. Apply actual-amount, statutory and shared ceilings in order.
  5. Recompute tax, rebate, surcharge, marginal relief and cess.
  6. Reconcile official statements and retain an audit trail.

Worked example

EPF ₹78,000, PPF ₹60,000, tuition ₹45,000 and life premium ₹25,000 total ₹2.08 lakh, but the shared deduction remains ₹1.5 lakh.

The example is an audit model, not a substitute for the taxpayer's records. Change one input—such as residence, regime, payment date, disability band, contribution payer, state, service period or income type—and the answer may change.

Decision checks before claiming or calculating

  1. Correct period: confirm whether the question concerns AY 2026–27 or Tax Year 2026–27.
  2. Correct statute: cite the 2025 Act for income from 1 April 2026; use the Social Security Code for current gratuity entitlement.
  3. Correct person: establish who paid, earned, received or is legally eligible.
  4. Correct base: use statutory salary, wages, interest, contribution or adjusted income—not a convenient payroll label.
  5. Correct ceiling: apply actual-amount, shared, lifetime and gross-total-income ceilings in the right sequence.
  6. Correct evidence: reconcile the result to official statements, certificates, payroll and bank records.

What Generic Pages Miss

  • They risk adding advertised limits.
  • They risk ignoring shared caps.
  • They risk double-counting payments.
  • They risk ignoring rebate and regime.
  • They risk allowing deductions beyond gross total income.

They also frequently confuse a tax deduction with a tax credit, a labour entitlement with an income-tax exemption, or a monthly payroll deduction with final annual tax. Finin2min should show the accepted input, rejected input, legal reason and tax impact separately.

Practical Documentation Checklist

  • provision ledger
  • payment proofs
  • gross-total-income computation
  • regime comparison
  • payroll declaration
  • rejection audit trail
Related Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
Open Calculator →

See the broader Income-tax Act 2025 study guide hub for related rules and calculators on this topic.

Finin2min Summary

The short answer: the ₹1.5 lakh ceiling survives the renumbering to Section 123, but two things actually decide whether it helps you — your regime choice, and whether your specific payment is genuinely on the eligible list rather than just labelled “savings.”

Tax Year 2026–27 means income earned from 1 April 2026 under the Income-tax Act, 2025. It is different from AY 2026–27, which covers FY 2025–26 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Legacy section labels are retained only to match genuine search language.

The practical result should be traceable to documents and a visible computation. A statutory maximum is a ceiling, not an automatic entitlement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the direct rule for Section 80C deduction limit FY 2026-27?
The ₹1.5 lakh aggregate cap is unchanged, but it now sits in Section 123 read with Schedule XV rather than the old Section 80C — and critically, it only applies if you file under the old tax regime for that year. Choosing the new regime means none of these payments reduce your taxable income.
What calculation should be used?
Confirm your regime first — this section is irrelevant on the new regime. Then list every payment that actually falls on the eligible-item list, not just anything labelled “savings”, remove any that fail a product-specific condition such as an ELSS unit sold within its lock-in, add them up, and cap the total at ₹1,50,000.
Why can two taxpayers get different results?
Two taxpayers with identical total savings can get very different deductions because the products differ: one may have put money into eligible instruments (PPF, ELSS, home-loan principal) while another put the same amount into a non-qualifying deposit or a life policy that fails the sum-assured test. The aggregate ceiling is the same for both; what counts toward it is not.
What is the most important document?
Start with provision ledger and reconcile it with payment proofs; eligibility cannot be created by a calculator input alone.
What mistake most often overstates the result?
The most frequent error is adding advertised limits. The full working should display the rejected amount and reason.
Which law and period should be cited?
Cite Section 123 read with Schedule XV of the Income-tax Act, 2025 for any Tax Year 2026–27 computation (income from 1 April 2026 onward). A return for FY 2025–26 (AY 2026–27) still falls under the old Income-tax Act, 1961 and its Section 80C numbering — do not mix the two citation styles in the same computation.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Primary category
Income Tax
Official starting point
www.incometax.gov.in

Page source links