Skip to main content
Companies Act & MCA

Related Party Transaction Schedule: AS 18 Evidence File

Related Party Transaction Schedule: AS 18 Evidence File
Finin2min Controllership Desk·June 2026·9 min readRPTValidated: 17 June 2026

✓ Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 20 June 2026

Related-party schedules should not be prepared from memory at audit time. Finance needs a live register of parties, transactions, balances, approvals and disclosures.

In short: Maintain a continuously updated related-party register, not a year-end reconstruction. Confirm whether your company discloses under AS 18 or Ind AS 24 — they are not interchangeable and have different disclosure triggers — and route every related-party transaction through the Section 188 approval chain before it happens, not after.

Detailed analysis

Why this matters
AS 18 establishes disclosure requirements for related-party relationships and transactions. The finance risk is missing entities controlled by founders/directors, unrecorded balances, or transactions not supported by contracts/approvals.
Related Calculator
Companies Act Related-Party Transaction Approval Checker
Open Calculator →

Which standard actually applies: AS 18 or Ind AS 24?

This is not optional to get right. AS 18 applies to companies that are not required to follow Ind AS — broadly, smaller and non-listed companies reporting under the notified (non-Ind-AS) Accounting Standards. Companies that are required to follow Ind AS, under MCA’s phased roadmap (broadly listed companies and larger unlisted companies above the applicable net-worth or turnover thresholds), must apply Ind AS 24 instead — the two are not interchangeable. The practical difference that catches finance teams out: AS 18 requires disclosure only where a transaction actually occurred in the period, while Ind AS 24 requires disclosing the related-party relationship itself even where no transaction took place — an Ind-AS company can have a genuine disclosure gap in a year with zero dealings with a related party.

Practical example

Example
Founder-owned company provides marketing support worth ₹6 lakh. Finance checks related-party status, agreement, invoice, board/approval requirement, arm’s-length support and disclosure in financial statements.

Evidence and control checklist

AreaWhat to checkEvidence to save
Related party masterDirectors, KMP, relatives, group entities and control relationships.Declaration forms and entity chart.
Transaction captureSales, purchases, loans, reimbursements and guarantees.Ledger extract and contract/invoice support.
Approval trailBoard/shareholder/audit committee as applicable.Minutes, resolutions and approval notes.
Balance confirmationReceivable/payable/loan balances.Confirmations and ageing.
DisclosureAS 18/Schedule III disclosure support.Disclosure schedule and management representation.

Common mistakes

Avoid these mistakes
  • Relying only on vendor/customer name search.
  • Missing founder-controlled entities.
  • No balance confirmations.
  • Transactions without agreement or approval.
  • Disclosure prepared after audit queries only.

Official reference framework

Checked on 17 June 2026
Based only on official India Code, MCA and ICAI source pages listed below. Check the latest Companies Act, Schedule III, accounting standards, Ind AS/AS applicability and auditor guidance before closing or filing.
📊
Build your controllership close folderSave reconciliations, schedules, approvals, audit PBC, statutory tie-outs and board MIS support month-wise.
Explore Finance Guides →

Official sources used

This article is intentionally source-limited to official India Code, MCA and ICAI material. Source validation date: 17 June 2026. Verify final positions with latest Companies Act, Schedule III, accounting standards, Ind AS/AS applicability and auditor guidance before closing or filing.

FAQs

Does AS 18 or Ind AS 24 apply to my company? â–¾

AS 18 applies if your company is not required to follow Ind AS. Ind AS 24 applies instead if your company falls under MCA’s Ind AS roadmap — broadly listed companies and larger unlisted companies above the applicable net-worth or turnover thresholds. Check your company’s current Ind AS applicability status before choosing which standard to disclose under.

Who should declare related parties? â–¾

Directors, key managerial personnel, their relatives, and entities they control or significantly influence should all provide written declarations at the start of each financial year and whenever their related-party status changes — a one-time declaration at incorporation is not sufficient.

Should balances be confirmed? â–¾

Yes — material related-party receivable, payable and loan balances should be independently confirmed and aged, not just carried forward from the prior year’s ledger. Missing confirmations are a common reason related-party balances draw an audit qualification.

Do approvals matter? â–¾

Yes. Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires board approval for related-party contracts and arrangements, with audit-committee approval and, above prescribed thresholds, shareholder approval by ordinary resolution — with the related party abstaining from voting. The exact threshold and approval level depend on the transaction’s nature and value.

What evidence should be saved? â–¾

Related-party declarations, the underlying contract or agreement, board/audit-committee/shareholder approval minutes, invoices or transaction support, balance confirmations, and the final AS 18/Ind AS 24 disclosure schedule reconciled to the financial statements — saved together, not reconstructed at audit time.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.

Primary category
Companies Act & MCA
Official starting point
www.mca.gov.in

Page source links

Calculate this

Work the numbers for this topic with a Finin2min tool.