Refund Adjustment Under Income-tax Act 2025: Notice Triggers, Response Strategy and Penalties
Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 26 September 2026
Corrected 26 September 2026: the earlier version described a "Section 245A" that does not exist — refund set-off is Section 438 of the Income-tax Act 2025 (old Section 245). It also cited wrong sections for rectification, appeal, interest, penalty and TDS default (Sections 287, 357, 411, 412 and 398), and presented the 30-day response window as a statutory period (it is CPC practice; Section 438 requires only a written intimation).
You filed your ITR, your Form 26AS confirms TDS, and you're expecting a refund of ₹45,000. Then the e-filing portal shows: "Your refund of ₹45,000 has been adjusted against outstanding demand of ₹38,000 for AY 2020-21. Net refund payable: ₹7,000." This scenario is playing out across thousands of taxpayer accounts in the ITR 2026 season. The Income-tax Act 2025 retains the refund adjustment power under Section 438 — but also retains your right to contest it. This guide walks you through the triggers, the 30-day window, and the step-by-step response strategy.
Section 438 of the Income-tax Act 2025 — The New Provision
Under the old Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 245 allowed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adjust any refund due to a taxpayer against any outstanding demand. The Income-tax Act 2025 carries this forward under Section 438, which requires a written intimation to the taxpayer before the adjustment. CPC's notice in practice allows a 30-day response window before making the adjustment.
| Aspect | Old Act (Section 245) | New Act (Section 438) |
|---|---|---|
| Provision name | Section 245 — Set-off of refunds against tax remaining payable | Section 438 — Set off and withholding of refunds in certain cases |
| Prior notice required | Yes — intimation before adjustment | Yes — written intimation mandatory (Section 438) |
| Response time for taxpayer | The section requires written intimation but fixes no period; CPC's notice typically allows 30 days | The section requires written intimation but fixes no response period; CPC's notice continues to allow about 30 days |
| Demands eligible for set-off | Any tax, interest, penalty outstanding | Any tax, interest, penalty, fee outstanding under new Act |
| Consequence of no response | Deemed consent; adjustment proceeds | Deemed consent; adjustment proceeds |
| Adjustment limit | Full refund can be adjusted | Full refund can be adjusted; excess demand stays alive |
What Triggers a Refund Adjustment Notice
Not every outstanding demand leads to a Section 438 notice. The AO (or CPC's automated system) checks the following before initiating adjustment:
- Confirmed outstanding demand: The demand must be confirmed — not merely raised. If you've filed a rectification or an appeal that is pending, the demand should technically be under dispute.
- Refund due in the current year: A refund must be crystallised and payable in the same PAN — refunds from one PAN cannot be adjusted against demand on another entity.
- No stay order in force: If CIT(A), ITAT, High Court, or Supreme Court has granted a stay on the demand, the adjustment cannot be made.
- No deposits exceeding demand: If you have deposited 20% of the demand as pre-deposit for an appeal, many AOs treat it as reduced demand — though this is not always automated at CPC level.
Common Trigger Scenarios
| Trigger | Demand Origin | What Typically Goes Wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Old TDS mismatch | AY 2018-19 to AY 2022-23 processing intimations | TDS not reflecting in 26AS; deductor didn't file TDS return correctly |
| Unverified AIS data | CPC automated processing under Section 143(1) | Interest income or dividend income added by AIS but not reported in ITR |
| Revised return not processed | Original ITR processed with errors before revised ITR | Both demands live simultaneously; CPC adjusts against older demand |
| Unreported capital gains | STT/SFT data in AIS shows capital gains not declared | Short-term gain on mutual fund sale via broker not included in ITR |
| Old penalty not paid | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) or old sections | Penalty from concluded scrutiny assessment years old, forgotten by taxpayer |
Step-by-Step Response Strategy — The 30-Day Window
How to Respond to a Section 438 Notice
Case Study: Rajesh's ₹55,000 Refund Swallowed by a 6-Year-Old TDS Demand
Rajesh, a senior IT consultant, filed his AY 2026-27 ITR in July 2026 expecting a ₹55,000 refund (excess TDS deducted by his employer). In August 2026, he received a Section 438 intimation: refund to be adjusted against ₹42,000 outstanding demand for AY 2020-21 (a processing intimation under old Section 143(1) that had flagged his savings bank interest).
Rajesh checked his AY 2020-21 record. He had declared the interest income in his ITR — but his bank had filed its SFT report late, and CPC had added the interest again from AIS, creating a ₹42,000 duplicate demand. He had never noticed the demand notification on the portal.
- He logged into e-Proceedings and found the original AY 2020-21 intimation with the demand
- He obtained a letter from his bank confirming the SFT correction filed in January 2023
- He responded within 15 days with the bank letter and ITR extract showing the interest already declared
- CPC reviewed and dropped the demand within 3 weeks; full ₹55,000 refund credited
When the Adjustment Has Already Happened — Recovery Path
If you missed the notice and the refund was already adjusted, your options depend on whether the underlying demand is correct:
If the Demand Is Correct (But You Disagree With Quantum)
- File a rectification application under Section 287 (Income-tax Act 2025; old Section 154) for any arithmetic or factual errors in the original assessment order.
- File an appeal under Section 357 (new Act) before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) within 30 days of the order.
- Pay 20% of the confirmed disputed demand as pre-deposit if you wish to stay the remaining demand while appeal is pending.
If the Demand Is Completely Wrong (Data Error / Duplicate)
- File a Grievance on the e-filing portal under "Refund / Demand" category with documentary evidence.
- For demands arising from old 143(1) intimations based on AIS data errors, approach the deductor/SFT filer for a correction certificate.
- If CPC is unresponsive, escalate to your jurisdictional AO via a written representation, citing the incorrect data and requesting rectification or withdrawal of the demand under Section 287 of the Income-tax Act 2025.
Penalties and Interest on Unaddressed Demands
Beyond refund adjustments, unresolved demands carry continuing costs under the Income-tax Act 2025:
| Consequence | Applicable Section (New Act) | Rate / Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Simple interest on unpaid demand | Section 220(2) → Section 411 of the new Act | 1% per month from demand date until payment |
| Penalty for failure to pay demand | Section 221 → Section 412 of the new Act | Up to 100% of tax in arrears; AO discretion |
| Recovery proceedings | Section 226 → Sections 413 to 422 of the new Act (recovery) | Attachment of bank accounts, property; can be initiated after 30 days of demand |
| TDS default interest on short deduction | Section 201(1A) → Section 398 of the new Act | 1% per month (short deduction); 1.5% per month (non-remittance) |
The AIS Mismatch — Root Cause of Most 2026 Adjustments
A significant portion of adjustment notices in the 2026 ITR season stem from Annual Information Statement (AIS) data discrepancies. The AIS aggregates data from multiple sources — banks, mutual funds, brokers, property registrars, and foreign remittance banks. When the AIS data differs from your ITR declaration, CPC raises a demand under the processing intimation.
Common AIS vs ITR Mismatches Causing Demands
- Savings account interest: Multiple banks report interest; taxpayer declares net but misses one account
- Dividend income: Dividend from old physical folio shares not in demat — not auto-populated in ITR portal pre-fill
- Mutual fund redemptions: Switch transactions (Growth to IDCW) reported as "sale" in AIS but no gain since same folio
- Employer stock options: ESOP perquisite reported twice — by employer in 26AS and by depository in AIS
- NRI property sale: Property registrar reports full sale value; taxpayer correctly claims indexed cost — AIS shows gross proceeds as "income"
Refund Season 2026 — Pre-Filing Checklist
- Log in to e-filing portal and check "Response to Outstanding Demand" for all assessment years
- Download AIS and TIS from portal; reconcile with your actual income records
- File AIS feedback for any incorrect data (option: "Income is not pertaining to me" or "Duplicate entry")
- Verify Form 26AS for all TDS credits; cross-check with employer Form 16 and bank TDS certificates
- For any demand under appeal, upload appeal order / stay order in e-Proceedings section
- For demands already paid, upload challan details in "Demand Response" against each open demand
- If deductor has filed a correction TDS return, obtain revised Form 16A before filing ITR
- Screenshot every response submission with portal-generated acknowledgment number
Frequently Asked Questions
Source and review trail
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.
- Primary category
- Income Tax
- Official starting point
- www.incometax.gov.in
Page source links
The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added when available.
Primary sources & related provisions
Statutory provisions referenced in this guide:
- Form 130 (Certificate under section 395 for tax deducted; earlier Form 16) - Income-tax Forms, 2026
- Section 438 (Set off and withholding of refunds in certain cases; earlier Section 245) - Income-tax Act
- Section 439 (Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income; earlier Section 271) - Income-tax Act
- Section 356 (Appealable orders before Joint Commissioner (Appeals)) - Income-tax Act