JPMorgan earns from banking, markets and asset management under heavy regulation. Berkshire combines insurance float, operating subsidiaries and long-term investments. Their earnings are not directly interchangeable.
JPMorgan Chase and Berkshire Hathaway are both enormous capital allocators, but they use fundamentally different balance sheets. JPMorgan takes deposits, extends credit, intermediates markets and operates under bank capital and liquidity rules. Berkshire owns insurance businesses, industrial companies, utilities and a large investment portfolio.
JPMorgan reported 2025 net revenue of roughly $182.4 billion and net income near $57.0 billion. Berkshire reported 2025 net earnings of about $67.0 billion, while operating earnings were lower because GAAP net earnings include market-value changes in investments.
Comparing headline earnings without adjusting for these architectures creates false precision. Bank investors focus on net interest income, credit costs, capital and return on tangible equity. Berkshire investors focus on operating earnings, insurance underwriting, float, subsidiary cash generation and capital deployment.
Calendar 2025 / Calendar 2025
Net income about $57.0 billion / Net earnings about $67.0 billion
Deposits, loans and markets / Insurance float, businesses and investments
Bank capital and liquidity / Capital allocation and insurance risk
| Measure | JPMorgan Chase | Berkshire Hathaway | Reading note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting period | Calendar 2025 | Calendar 2025 | Broadly aligned. |
| Headline earnings | Net income about $57.0 billion | Net earnings about $67.0 billion | Berkshire includes investment-value volatility. |
| Balance-sheet engine | Deposits, loans and markets | Insurance float, businesses and investments | Risks differ materially. |
| Key constraint | Bank capital and liquidity | Capital allocation and insurance risk | Not directly comparable. |
JPMorgan monetises a regulated banking franchise across consumer banking, commercial banking, investment banking, trading, payments and asset management. Deposits are both a funding advantage and a fiduciary obligation.
Berkshire uses insurance float and retained earnings to own businesses and securities for long periods. It can move capital across subsidiaries with less dependence on external funding, but catastrophe exposure and investment concentration matter.
The stronger company can change by battleground. Distribution may favour one side, while capital efficiency, regulation or technology transition favours the other. The analysis should therefore avoid declaring a universal winner from one quarter or one headline metric.
The right comparison is capital allocation quality under different constraints. JPMorgan must preserve liquidity and regulatory ratios while earning an adequate spread and fee return. Berkshire can tolerate long holding periods but faces the challenge of finding investments large enough to matter.
A sensible investor or strategy team should separate operating quality from market price. An excellent business can be a poor purchase at an excessive valuation, while a weaker business can appear cheap because the market is correctly pricing structural risk. The comparison therefore stops at business analysis and does not create a buy or sell recommendation.
A comparison should be reproducible. Keep the original annual report or results release, the reporting date, the metric definition, the currency and any segment reconciliation used. For JPMorgan Chase and Berkshire Hathaway, record whether the figure is consolidated, standalone, segmental, adjusted or reported under GAAP or another accounting framework.
When management uses an operating measure such as bookings, order value, active clients, subscribers or ARPU, retain its definition and avoid replacing it with a similar term from the other company. That evidence prevents a visually neat table from becoming an economically false comparison.