Skip to main content
Finin2minCurrent Action Brief · 13 Aug 2026
GST & Indirect TaxUpdated 5 October 2026

GST on Pure Reimbursements Between Group Companies: Pure-Agent and Cross-Charge Test

By Ravi Sisodia · Reviewed by CA Divyanshu Sengar · Updated 5 October 2026

2-minute summary

Current position

A reimbursement between group companies is excluded from taxable value only if the payer qualifies as a pure agent under Rule 33. Related-party status does not relax the conditions. If the recharging company procured the service on its own account or bundled it into a broader management service, the recovery normally remains part of value.

Control and evidence map

#ControlWhat the file should show
1Identify the third-party contract and legal recipient of the external service.
2Check written authorisation for payment on behalf of the recipient.
3Separate exact pass-through from the supplier’s own service fee in the invoice.
4For non-pure-agent cost sharing, apply related/distinct-person valuation and place-of-supply rules.
5Reconcile external invoice, intercompany allocation key, GST invoice and ITC utilisation.

Worked example

GroupCo A pays a statutory filing fee that GroupCo B is legally required to pay, under B’s written authorisation, and recovers the exact amount separately. This can be tested against Rule 33. By contrast, if A contracts an external consultant for a group project and allocates the consulting fee across subsidiaries, the fact that A earns no markup does not by itself make the recharge a pure-agent payment.

Common mistakes

  1. Equating “no markup” with pure agent.
  2. Ignoring the legal recipient named in the third-party contract.
  3. Combining reimbursable and service-fee amounts without separate disclosure.
  4. Using a management recharge journal instead of a GST document where a taxable supply exists.

Frequently asked questions

Is cost-to-cost recharge automatically outside GST?

No. Rule 33 conditions must be met for pure-agent exclusion.

Does related-party status change the pure-agent test?

No.

What if the recipient has full ITC?

That may affect Rule 28 valuation, but supply character and invoicing still need to be addressed.

What is the strongest evidence?

Third-party contract, recipient liability, written authorisation, separate invoice disclosure and exact payment/recovery trail.

Official sources

Disclaimer: Educational and informational content only. Apply the current law, instrument, contract and facts before acting; obtain professional advice for material or disputed matters.

Disclaimer

Educational and professional reference only; confirm the current law, rates and the facts of your case before relying on this page.

Calculate this

Work the numbers for this topic with a Finin2min tool.

Educational and professional reference only — not financial, tax or legal advice. Verify the current official position from the primary source before relying on any figure, rate, provision or deadline.