GST on Cloud-Kitchen Franchise Fee, Platform Commission and Brand Royalty: Invoice/ITC Map
By Ravi Sisodia · Reviewed by CA Divyanshu Sengar · Updated 5 October 2026
2-minute summary
- Brand/franchise rights and platform/intermediation or technology services may have different contractual scopes even if invoiced monthly.
- If one party is an e-commerce operator for restaurant supplies, section 9(5) obligations and platform fee treatment must not be confused.
- Royalties/fees paid between related group entities require normal valuation/related-party analysis where applicable.
- ITC should be tested by the recipient on each inward service and any blocked-credit issue, especially where premises fit-out or personal consumption elements exist.
Current position
Control and evidence map
| # | Control | What the file should show |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create a payment-stream map from the franchise and platform agreements. | |
| 2 | Identify supplier GSTIN and recipient GSTIN for each fee. | |
| 3 | Separate restaurant-supply tax collection mechanics from the platform/franchise service invoice. | |
| 4 | Reconcile royalty base - gross sales, net sales, or another metric - to POS/order data. | |
| 5 | Tie ITC to invoices, business use and section 17 restrictions. | |
Worked example
A kitchen pays 6% brand royalty to the franchisor and 18% marketplace commission to a delivery platform. Even though both are calculated from sales, they arise under different contracts and should not be netted. The restaurant-supply tax mechanism, the platform service invoice and the brand-licence invoice must each reconcile to the correct GSTIN and turnover base.
Common mistakes
- Netting royalties and platform fees against customer collections without tax documents.
- Confusing tax on restaurant supplies with GST on services supplied by the platform/franchisor.
- Using one SAC for every fee without reading the contract.
- Claiming ITC on blocked or non-business components without review.
Frequently asked questions
Is franchise royalty the same as platform commission?
No. They arise from different supplies and should be documented separately.
Does section 9(5) settle the platform’s own fee GST?
No. The e-commerce operator rule for specified underlying supplies is distinct from GST on services the platform itself supplies.
Can royalty be based on sales?
Yes contractually, but the royalty invoice and turnover base should reconcile.
What is the main finance control?
Separate supplier/recipient, contract, tax invoice, turnover base and ITC for each payment stream.
Official sources
- Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (current consolidated law)
- Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs - CGST Valuation Rules (current rules)
Disclaimer
Educational and professional reference only; confirm the current law, rates and the facts of your case before relying on this page.