EHTP Automated Statutory Services: Digital Approval, Intimation and Compliance Evidence
By Ravi Sisodia · Reviewed by CA Divyanshu Sengar · Updated 5 October 2026
2-minute summary
- The August 2026 official release says STPI has automated EHTP statutory services through a digital platform, including approval and final intimation. That improves turnaround and traceability, but a digital approval is only as reliable as the application data and attached evidence.
- A finance/compliance team should preserve the submitted form, attachment set, acknowledgement, query/response history, approval/final intimation and the internal transaction that depended on that approval. This creates an auditable chain if portal data later changes.
- Automation also changes control design: maker-checker review, access rights, document versioning and a portal-to-register reconciliation become more important because a wrong electronic submission can be processed quickly.
Current position
Control and evidence map
| # | Control / evidence requirement | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maintain a statutory-service register with request type, unit, filing date, portal reference, owner, current status and linked transaction. | |
| 2 | Apply maker-checker review to key fields, attachments and declarations before electronic submission. | |
| 3 | Archive a PDF/screenshot of the filed version and each authority query/response, not just the final approval. | |
| 4 | Reconcile final approval/intimation conditions to procurement, import, asset movement or other operational execution before release. | |
| 5 | Periodically review user access, dormant IDs and whether open portal requests still match the internal compliance calendar. | |
Worked example
An EHTP unit seeks an online approval for movement of capital goods. The maker selects the wrong asset list but the request is approved. If the team retains only the approval PDF, it may miss that the approval was obtained on inaccurate data. A stronger control archives the submitted schedule, applies a checker before filing and ties the final intimation back to the exact asset movement.
Common mistakes
- Assuming a portal-generated approval proves the underlying facts were correct.
- Letting one user prepare, submit and close high-impact statutory requests without review.
- Saving only the final approval and losing the filed application/version history.
- Failing to communicate approval conditions to procurement, logistics, finance and plant teams.
Frequently asked questions
What did the Government say was automated?
The official release refers to statutory services through the digital platform, including approval and final intimation.
Does portal automation remove the need for evidence?
No. It increases the importance of retaining what was filed and how the approval was used.
Should screenshots be the only archive?
Prefer downloadable filing/approval documents where available, with screenshots as supporting evidence.
What is the best internal control?
A filing register plus maker-checker review and transaction-level reconciliation to the approval condition.
Official sources
- Press Information Bureau / Ministry of Electronics & IT - Electronics Hardware Technology Parks Strengthen India’s Export Oriented Electronics Manufacturing Ecosystem (PIB PRID 2299340; 2026-08-14)
- Software Technology Parks of India / MeitY - Statutory Services - STP and EHTP Schemes (Current official page; current)
- Directorate General of Foreign Trade - Handbook of Procedures 2023 - Chapter 6: EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP (HBP 2023 Chapter 6; current consolidation)
Disclaimer
Educational and professional reference only; confirm the current law, rates and the facts of your case before relying on this page.