Lending or borrowing money from a friend or relative in cash? Repaying a loan in cash because the lender prefers it? These everyday situations can attract a penalty equal to 100% of the amount involved under the Income Tax Act - not because the transaction itself is illegal, but because it was done in cash above a prescribed limit. Sections 269SS, 269T, and 269ST exist precisely to discourage this.
Sections 269SS, 269T, and 269ST are anti-cash-economy provisions designed to push high-value transactions through traceable banking channels (cheque, bank transfer, demand draft, or other prescribed electronic modes) rather than cash. The penalties attached to violations are deliberately severe - often equal to the entire amount of the transaction - to make cash dealings above the limits commercially unviable.
Section 269SS prohibits any person from accepting a loan, deposit, or any "specified sum" (including advance money received in relation to transfer of immovable property, whether or not the transfer eventually takes place) of ₹20,000 or more in cash from any other person.
Section 269T is the mirror-image provision for repayment. It prohibits any branch of a banking company, co-operative bank, or any other company/firm/person from repaying any loan or deposit (including interest), where the amount of the loan/deposit together with interest is ₹20,000 or more, in cash.
Section 269ST is much wider in scope than 269SS/269T. It prohibits any person from receiving an amount of ₹2,00,000 or more in cash, in aggregate, from another person:
This applies broadly - to sale of goods, services, gifts, and virtually any receipt of money - not just loans and deposits. There are limited exceptions (e.g., receipts by government, banking companies, post office savings bank, co-operative banks, and certain transactions covered under Section 269SS).
| Section | What It Restricts | Threshold | Penalty Section | Who Is Penalized |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 269SS | Accepting loans/deposits/specified sums in cash | ₹20,000 or more (aggregate) | 271D | Person accepting the cash (borrower/depositee) |
| 269T | Repaying loans/deposits (with interest) in cash | ₹20,000 or more | 271E | Person repaying the cash (lender/depositor's repayer) |
| 269ST | Receiving any sum in cash (single transaction/event/day) | ₹2,00,000 or more | 271DA | Person receiving the cash |
| Scenario | Issue |
|---|---|
| You lend ₹50,000 in cash to your brother for an emergency | Your brother (the recipient/borrower) violates Section 269SS - penalty of ₹50,000 can be levied on him |
| A friend repays a ₹25,000 loan to you in cash | Your friend (repaying in cash) violates Section 269T - penalty of ₹25,000 can be levied on your friend |
| A jeweller receives ₹2,50,000 in cash for a single piece of jewellery from one customer | The jeweller (recipient) violates Section 269ST - penalty of ₹2,50,000 can be levied on the jeweller |
| A caterer receives ₹80,000 cash on day 1 and ₹1,50,000 cash on day 2 from the same client for one wedding event | Aggregated for the event, total is ₹2,30,000 - this can violate Section 269ST even though no single day's receipt crosses ₹2 lakh individually |
Section 273B provides that no penalty under 271D, 271E, or 271DA shall be imposed if the person proves there was a "good and sufficient reason" for the cash transaction. However, this is assessed case-by-case by the tax authorities, and relying on it is risky - it's far safer to simply avoid cash transactions above these limits altogether by using banking channels.
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. This panel separates the category authority from page-specific references.
The prior page did not embed a page-specific external source. The category authority above is the minimum verification starting point; a specific instrument should be added during the next substantive editorial review.