Startup & CFO Finance · Practical guide
Ind AS 116: Lease Liability and Right-of-Use Asset
A lease liability is the present value of unpaid lease payments. The right-of-use asset also reflects eligible commencement adjustments. Build the payment calendar first: recording the same rent in both the liability and a prepayment overstates the opening entry.
Start with these three answers
- Does the entity report under Ind AS, and does the contract contain a lease?
- Which payments belong in the lease term, and which are already paid?
- What evidence supports the discount rate, commencement date and asset adjustments?
The worked case below produces a ₹29.8422 lakh opening liability and a ₹31.9422 lakh asset. Those amounts differ for a reason; neither equals the first bank payment.
1. Confirm the framework and contract before calculating
This guide addresses a lessee applying Ind AS 116. A company applying notified Accounting Standards uses the applicable AS framework, including AS 19, rather than importing this model simply because it rents an office. The reporting framework is a prerequisite, not an optional way to improve EBITDA.
Under Ind AS 116 paragraph 9, assess at inception whether the contract conveys control of an identified asset for a period in exchange for consideration. A service arrangement is not automatically a lease because the supplier uses equipment. Document the identified asset, relevant use decisions and economic benefits; complex substitution rights require the application guidance.
Paragraphs 5–8 permit elections for qualifying short-term and low-value leases. “Short-term” means a lease term of 12 months or less at commencement and excludes a lease containing a purchase option. Assess the underlying asset's value when new for the low-value guidance; a small monthly instalment alone is insufficient. Do not invent a universal rupee threshold. The short-term election is by class; the low-value election can be lease by lease.
2. Make a dated payment and assumption file
Commencement is when the underlying asset becomes available for use, which may differ from signing, invoicing or the first payment. The lease term includes the non-cancellable period and qualifying extension or termination-option periods under paragraphs 18–21. A renewal is not automatically included or excluded merely because it is labelled optional.
- Separate lease and service components unless a permitted paragraph 15 election applies.
- Identify fixed and in-substance fixed payments, index/rate-linked payments, relevant guarantees and option or termination amounts under paragraphs 26–28.
- Record payments made at or before commencement separately from unpaid future payments.
- Use the implicit rate if readily determinable; otherwise support the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. It reflects a similar term, security, asset value and economic environment, not a convenient generic website rate.
3. Worked case: three annual payments in arrears
Assume an identified equipment lease starts on 1 April 2026 and ends after three years. The entity makes ₹12 lakh payments on 31 March 2027, 2028 and 2029. There is no ownership transfer, purchase option, extension, restoration obligation, variable rent or impairment in this case. The implicit rate cannot readily be determined; a supportable annual incremental borrowing rate of 10% is assumed. Tax and service-component amounts are outside this arithmetic, not declared exempt.
At commencement the entity also pays ₹2 lakh of lease consideration and a ₹0.60 lakh success-only commission that qualifies as an incremental initial direct cost. It receives a ₹0.50 lakh lease incentive immediately. The asset's useful life is at least three years, and straight-line consumption is appropriate.
Scroll sideways for all columns. Use Tab to focus the table, then the arrow keys.
| Item | Liability effect | ROU cost effect |
|---|---|---|
| Unpaid three annual payments, present value | 29.8422 | 29.8422 |
| Already-paid lease consideration | 0.0000 | +2.0000 |
| Incentive already received | 0.0000 | −0.5000 |
| Eligible success-only commission | 0.0000 | +0.6000 |
| Opening recognised amount | 29.8422 | 31.9422 |
Liability = 12/1.10 + 12/1.10² + 12/1.10³ = ₹29.8422 lakh. The already-paid ₹2 lakh is not discounted a second time. ROU cost is ₹29.8422 + ₹2 − ₹0.50 + ₹0.60 = ₹31.9422 lakh. The net commencement cash outflow is ₹2.10 lakh. Ordinary legal or negotiation expenditure does not qualify merely because it relates to a lease: the incremental-cost definition must be met.
4. Reconcile interest, payments and depreciation
Interest accretes on the outstanding liability; payment reduces it. The case's asset is depreciated over three years because there is no ownership transfer or reflected purchase option and its useful life is not shorter. Paragraph 32 requires a different period where those facts differ.
Scroll sideways for all columns. Use Tab to focus the table, then the arrow keys.
| Year end | Opening liability | Interest | Cash paid | Closing liability | ROU depreciation | Closing ROU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March 2027 | 29.8422 | 2.9842 | 12.0000 | 20.8264 | 10.6474 | 21.2948 |
| 31 March 2028 | 20.8264 | 2.0826 | 12.0000 | 10.9091 | 10.6474 | 10.6474 |
| 31 March 2029 | 10.9091 | 1.0909 | 12.0000 | 0.0000 | 10.6474 | 0.0000 |
Amounts are in ₹ lakh, shown to four decimals; calculations retain unrounded values. The liability finishes at zero. Total payments after commencement are ₹36 lakh, including ₹6.1578 lakh of interest. Total depreciation is ₹31.9422 lakh. Across all three years, interest plus depreciation is ₹38.10 lakh, equal to ₹36 lakh plus ₹2.10 lakh net commencement cash.
The first year's ₹13.6316 lakh combined expense exceeds its ₹12 lakh annual payment. This is the pattern of these assumptions, not evidence of an extra cash charge. The initial ROU/liability recognition is also not an operating cash receipt. Keep the bank calendar, liability schedule and asset schedule as three linked records.
5. Keep the model current after commencement
Do not overwrite the original schedule when rent or term changes. Keep the signed variation and evaluate reassessment or modification under paragraphs 39–46, including whether a revised rate is required. Assess impairment separately. A negotiated concession or extinguishment is not automatically a reduction of future interest.
The 2026 Ind AS amendment expressly brings lessee lease-liability derecognition within Ind AS 109 paragraphs 3.3.1 and 3.3.3, with annual-period and extinguishment transition rules. That scope does not replace this case's ordinary initial-measurement calculation. A termination, forgiveness or liability settlement needs its own current-rule assessment.
6. A practical closing file
- Keep the complete agreement, commencement evidence, option assessment, component allocation and rate memo.
- Reconcile opening liability + interest − actual payments ± reassessment to closing liability.
- Reconcile ROU additions, depreciation, impairment and adjustments to the asset ledger.
- Map balances, expense, maturity information and cash flows to the applicable presentation and disclosure requirements; paragraphs 47–60 address these.
- Check a lender covenant's own definitions before treating ROU recognition or a changed EBITDA figure as covenant headroom.
Common questions
Can I use the borrowing rate on an existing overdraft?
Only if the evidence supports the required comparable characteristics. An unsecured short-term facility rate is not automatically the incremental borrowing rate for a secured three-year lease.
Does a zero opening bank payment mean zero liability?
No. Unpaid future qualifying payments can create a liability at commencement. Conversely, prepaid consideration affects ROU cost without remaining in the unpaid-payment liability.
Does capitalization make the contract affordable?
No. Test actual rent dates and cash headroom separately. Recognition changes accounting presentation; it does not defer the contractual bank payment.
Sources and definitions
- ICAI Ind AS 116, 2025–26 edition: exemptions 5–8; identification 9; term 18–21; measurement 22–38, PDF 3–9; definitions PDF 27–30; disclosure 47–60
- G.S.R. 725(E), 12 August 2026: rule 2C and Ind AS 109 2.1(b)(ii), 7.1.14, 7.2.50; lease-liability derecognition scope and annual-period transition, PDF 20–22
The transaction amounts, dates, contract definitions, ratios and finance quotes in the examples are hypothetical inputs. Primary rules are used only within their stated scope and periods; no actual entity classification, borrowing availability or professional approval is certified.
Related tools and guidance
Educational business-finance guidance. Adapt the assumptions to actual contracts, cash dates and reporting requirements; obtain qualified advice for accounting, tax or legal decisions.