₹5 Crore Securities-Market-Asset Test for Individual Accredited Investors: SEBI Consultation Guide
By Ravi Sisodia · Reviewed by CA Divyanshu Sengar · Updated 5 October 2026
The consultation proposes a ₹5 crore securities-market-asset route for individual accredited investors. It is not yet an operative threshold; managers should use it only for impact modelling until SEBI finalises the framework.
Finin2min 2-Minute Summary
- ₹5 crore is a proposed individual securities-market-asset threshold in the consultation, not a current automatic entitlement.
- The calculation needs the final SEBI definition of qualifying securities-market assets.
- Evidence should establish ownership, date, value and any exclusions or encumbrances.
- Near-threshold cases deserve enhanced review because small valuation movements can change the result.
- Accreditation should remain distinct from product suitability, KYC and risk capacity.
Do not market the ₹5 crore route as live
Website calculators, investor decks and relationship-manager scripts should say 'proposed' until an operative circular/regulation is issued. An investor with ₹5 crore in a broad wealth statement should not be told that accreditation is already guaranteed.
Monitor final SEBI wording for whether the amount, asset perimeter or conditions change.
Build a transparent calculation sheet
List each qualifying account/holding, owner, value date, source and eligible amount. Excluded or disputed assets should remain visible as zero/adjusted lines rather than being deleted from the file.
Use a reviewer to confirm arithmetic and policy interpretation.
Manage valuation volatility around the threshold
For market-linked holdings, a portfolio can move across ₹5 crore quickly. The final framework may specify a determination date and validity. Until then, design the system to preserve the actual decision-date valuation rather than retroactively rewriting it.
Near-threshold cases should never be 'topped up' through unsupported valuations.
₹5 crore proposal case: market moves below the line after verification
Suppose an individual's qualifying portfolio is ₹5.15 crore on the determination date and falls to ₹4.70 crore during a market correction soon afterwards. The consultation's final adopted validity rules - not day-to-day price movements chosen ad hoc by the manager - should determine whether status remains valid.
That is why the evidence file needs a precise valuation date, source and decision timestamp. Recalculating historical status with today's market value would make the audit trail unstable.
At the same time, relationship teams should avoid telling the investor that the ₹5 crore proposal guarantees long-duration status. Validity and revalidation are separate elements that SEBI must finalise.
- Freeze decision-date valuation evidence.
- Keep market movement separate from later legal revalidation triggers.
- Avoid informal 'buffer' or rounding practices near the threshold.
- Recheck final threshold and validity wording before rollout.
Evidence quality at the threshold
Near the proposed threshold, evidence quality matters more than decimal precision. A ₹5.02 crore result built partly from stale screenshots is weaker than a lower but fully verified portfolio. The reviewer should reject unsupported lines rather than applying optimistic rounding to reach the proposed level.
- Do not round unsupported assets upward.
- Require stronger review for near-threshold cases.
Individual-test checklist
- ₹5 crore clearly labelled proposal.
- Qualifying-asset definition tracked.
- Decision-date portfolio evidence.
- Ownership/encumbrance review.
- Near-threshold quality check.
- Maker-checker approval.
- Suitability/KYC kept separate.
Questions readers commonly ask
Is ₹5 crore a live SEBI rule today?
No. It is part of the 13 August consultation proposal.
Can house property be added to reach ₹5 crore?
Use only assets within the final securities-market-asset definition; do not assume property qualifies.
What date should values use?
The final instrument must be followed; readiness systems should at least preserve a clear decision-date valuation.
Does crossing the threshold make every AIF/product suitable?
No. Accreditation is not the same as suitability.
Official / primary sources
- SEBI - Consultation Paper on Review of Accredited Investor Framework - 13 August 2026 consultation - proposal, not operative final framework
- SEBI - Current Reports Listings - Source check shows consultation status
- SEBI - Angel Fund Accredited-Investor Timeline Circular - 7 September 2026 separate operative timeline circular; does not by itself adopt the consultation proposals
Disclaimer
Important: General educational and professional-reference material. Verify the current operative instrument, effective date and exact facts before acting. Consultation papers are not final law unless SEBI subsequently adopts them. Educational and professional reference only; confirm the current law, rates and the facts of your case before relying on this page.